Quote from PsyrenXY >>

Quote from InfamousArchmage >> 

There was no need for you however to plant in your post such a dismissive attitude towards its critics.

I'm curious as to what exactly you're looking for here? Nobody on a D&D forum is going to be able to solve all the ethical issues with the technology; our ability to even discuss them here is limited to where they intersect one game.

Your ability or inability to solve the problem is beside the point. I did not suggest you had any sort of obligation to do so. You have a tendency to do this: make up for yourself what I am saying so you can argue against something I have not and have never said. I did not bring up what I brought up for the reasons you have made up for yourself: someone was acting as if there is nothing to be worried about and just dismissing AI's critics as being "hyperbolic." That is is being divisive. And is uncalled for.

Is it just not possible for you to engage in a conversation about whether or not AI could be or should be used for D&D without seeking to undermine others with a different perspective on the technology external to D&D?

Why was that brought up? People's attitudes towards AI external to D&D? If it's now so wrong for me to talk about it in a context external to D&D? It's okay for someone else to do this just to subtly insult others. But when called out for this and reminded of how many criticisms leveled against the technology are valid you want to then get defensive and change the rules. That is not how it works.