Level
2nd
Casting Time
1 Action
Range/Area
Touch
Components
V, S, M *
Duration
Concentration
1 Hour
School
Illusion
Attack/Save
None
Damage/Effect
Invisible
A creature you touch becomes invisible until the spell ends. Anything the target is wearing or carrying is invisible as long as it is on the target's person. The spell ends for a target that attacks or casts a spell.
At Higher Levels. When you cast this spell using a spell slot of 3rd level or higher, you can target one additional creature for each slot level above 2nd.
* - (an eyelash encased in gum arabic)
If a medium creature is invisible and is carrying a small creature and the medium creature goes invisible is the smaller one invisible or is it floating
If your on a horse and turn the horse invisible, are you also invisible or does it look like your floating
Ah, invisibility. A tried and true spell, useful at all levels of play on any character you make. Just be sure not to attack anything or cast spells and you’ll do just fine sneaking past the gnoll guards.
Arcane tricksters focus mainly on enchantment and illusion wizard spells that have to be 4th level or lower.
Is it enchantment or illusion: Yes
Is it a wizard spell: Yes
Is it fourth level or lower: Yes
They are all true, so this spell is available for Arcane Tricksters.
I feel like Brennan Lee Mulligan read this, and kept it in his back pocket until that thing happened in EXU: Calamity...
The spells says: “A creature you touch becomes invisible until the spell ends”
If you meet these requirements you can use this on yourself.
if i were to throw (pocket)sand at an invisible creature, would the creature be "wearing" the sand? or would the sand make an outline of the creature?
Considering the following sentence within the spell description...
How does this interact with items that were not in the possession of the target at the time the spell was cast (e.g. an invisible rogue steals a ring of keys from a distracted guard)? I can see the wording interpreted two different ways...
"A creature you touch becomes invisible until the spell ends. Anything the target is wearing or carrying is invisible as long as it is on the target's person. The spell ends for a target that attacks or casts a spell."
As a DM, I think that if a creature is hit with arrows or flour, those things also become Invisible. Yet the creature can be tracked from blood drops if it's bloodied or the flaking of flour as it moves suddenly appearing as it moves.
My reasoning is that because the clause of wearing/carrying is completely separate from the creature becoming Invisible, it's intended for anything that is stolen or picked up while Invisible also becomes Invisible as well.
Otherwise I'd think that the spell would be worded this way, if it was intended for new things to not become Invisible:
"A creature you touch and anything it's wearing or carrying becomes Invisible until the spell ends. The spell ends for a target that attacks or casts a spell."
I got curious, would a race that has the innate ability to cast this spell still be required to use material components? I can definitely see the verbal and somatic components still being required since it could be a bit much to say my character (a Glasya Tiefling, for reference) could cast Invisibility completely silently or even while his hands are tied together. And since this ability comes from his infernal ancestry rather than the extensive study of magic theory like what wizards go through, I was wondering both how necessary could material components be for him when casting through his racial abilities as well as how he might've figured out he's capable of this magic in the first place? Was it by pure chance? Or with purposeful intent? Definitely something I'll be asking my DM later, but I was also curious to see what others of the community might say about this, too.
The PHB explicitly states spells that say "creature you touch" can be self-affecting.
So yes, you certainly can.
Since this spell effects only one creature? Would a 2nd creature in the mouth of another still be visible? Like if a squirrel was in the mouth of an invisible lion, could you still see the squirrel because it is the 2nd creature or would it get full cover this way?
Thinking of home brewing a monster pairing that would work this way if I can. Otherwise, I got to make it am ability or effect instead of a spell.
aren't you always thecnitaly touching yourself
Since this doesn't need the creature to be willing. I can turn a sleeping NPC into a really confused ghost for 1 hour, right? (unless it attacks someone)
Question:
The Ceric can cast "Spiritual Guadians". its a con Spell. After cast, if other person cast invisibility on the cleric and the "guadians" are activ, is the invisibility gone, when the guadians make damage?
If you hold someone on your back and turn yourself invisible (you're small and they're medium) does the bigger buy count as being carried/worn, even if I may not be able to move while holding him?
"When a creature can’t see you, you have advantage on attack rolls against it." - PHB, Chapter 9: Combat / Making an Attack / Unseen Attackers and Targets. It only works once with standard invisibility, though. Gotta make it count.
If the creature you touch is also carrying another creature do they both become invisible?
Does invisibility effect a creatures shadows? Won't effect my ruling but interested to hear discussion :o
no way bro said le sigh