We are only going to be playing from the Players handbook spells for a druid, and I can't seem how to turn off or hide the EE Specific Spells from my known spells list on D&D Beyond. Anyone know how to hide those or remove them with a setting?
This is super annoying to me that they have no way to filter out the random spells, class features, and races they just threw into the character creator. They don't even appear in the core physical books I own. When creating their characters my players will have random spells and abilities I never even heard about. They really need to add a way to disable their free content.
I was going to suggest reading the EE source here so that you'd know what's in it, but it looks like they don't have the Elemental Evil Player's Companion in the available sources on DDB. Weird. So for what it's worth, here's a link to WoC's PDF for your reference.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Helpful rewriter of Japanese->English translation and delver into software codebases (she/e/they)
This is super annoying to me that they have no way to filter out the random spells, class features, and races they just threw into the character creator. They don't even appear in the core physical books I own. When creating their characters my players will have random spells and abilities I never even heard about. They really need to add a way to disable their free content.
Aside from EEPC, have you checked to see if they are someone's homebrew (by turning off homebrew)? Homebrew gets shared automatically.
I more or less suggested above that someone get a copy of the EEPC for reference as a DM, but if say Adventurer's League still has the PHB+1 source limit, then yeah, not being able to filter out non-PHB & Basic Rules sources is problematic. (And DDB could stand to have the EEPC readable here.)
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Helpful rewriter of Japanese->English translation and delver into software codebases (she/e/they)
I more or less suggested above that someone get a copy of the EEPC for reference as a DM, but if say Adventurer's League still has the PHB+1 source limit, then yeah, not being able to filter out non-PHB & Basic Rules sources is problematic. (And DDB could stand to have the EEPC readable here.)
I definitely agree that EEPC should be readable here.
But luckily, AL just removed the PHB+1 limit this month (they are even allowing/requiring all existing characters to be rebuilt according to these rules).
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
We are only going to be playing from the Players handbook spells for a druid, and I can't seem how to turn off or hide the EE Specific Spells from my known spells list on D&D Beyond. Anyone know how to hide those or remove them with a setting?
I'm not sure, but if you have content sharing, the DM may be able to disable it as a source. Otherwise, no. All free content is automatically enabled.
This is super annoying to me that they have no way to filter out the random spells, class features, and races they just threw into the character creator. They don't even appear in the core physical books I own. When creating their characters my players will have random spells and abilities I never even heard about. They really need to add a way to disable their free content.
I was going to suggest reading the EE source here so that you'd know what's in it, but it looks like they don't have the Elemental Evil Player's Companion in the available sources on DDB. Weird. So for what it's worth, here's a link to WoC's PDF for your reference.
Helpful rewriter of Japanese->English translation and delver into software codebases (she/e/they)
Aside from EEPC, have you checked to see if they are someone's homebrew (by turning off homebrew)? Homebrew gets shared automatically.
I more or less suggested above that someone get a copy of the EEPC for reference as a DM, but if say Adventurer's League still has the PHB+1 source limit, then yeah, not being able to filter out non-PHB & Basic Rules sources is problematic. (And DDB could stand to have the EEPC readable here.)
Helpful rewriter of Japanese->English translation and delver into software codebases (she/e/they)
I definitely agree that EEPC should be readable here.
But luckily, AL just removed the PHB+1 limit this month (they are even allowing/requiring all existing characters to be rebuilt according to these rules).