An unarmed strike with your trunk is a melee attack, but it isn't free. I don't see the point in ever taking an unarmed strike with your trunk instead of an attack with a weapon except in a pinch (and you could always hit them with your fist in that case too).
I don't see what you're getting at. Why not just hit them with the sword? It isn't like overkill of a few points matters in most cases.
unarmed strikes aren't something you can normally dual wield if that's what you mean. so you couldn't get the dual wielding bonus action attack just from having your trunk or use your trunk on such an attack.
That's the closest I get to understanding what you mean...
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
An unarmed strike with your trunk is a melee attack, but it isn't free. I don't see the point in ever taking an unarmed strike with your trunk instead of an attack with a weapon except in a pinch (and you could always hit them with your fist in that case too).
I don't see what you're getting at. Why not just hit them with the sword? It isn't like overkill of a few points matters in most cases.
unarmed strikes aren't something you can normally dual wield if that's what you mean. so you couldn't get the dual wielding bonus action attack just from having your trunk or use your trunk on such an attack.
That's the closest I get to understanding what you mean...