I would tend to agree, seeing as how every character can qualify for an attack made as a bonus action and don't even have to use a finite resource to do it.
That belies some of the problem with the terminology. No PC class gets a feature called multi-attack. Only druids can access it via wild shape. PCs have various features that let them make more than one attack using various resources. The way PCs make more than one attack with the attack action is via extra attack. Two weapon fighting, War Priest, a few feats, and maybe some other class abilities allow bonus action attacks.
So the answer to the OP question is “how specific do you want to be?” Bonus action free? Then maybe the Druid is first. Resource free? Then no, the Druid has to use wild shape.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I would tend to agree, seeing as how every character can qualify for an attack made as a bonus action and don't even have to use a finite resource to do it.
That belies some of the problem with the terminology. No PC class gets a feature called multi-attack. Only druids can access it via wild shape. PCs have various features that let them make more than one attack using various resources. The way PCs make more than one attack with the attack action is via extra attack. Two weapon fighting, War Priest, a few feats, and maybe some other class abilities allow bonus action attacks.
So the answer to the OP question is “how specific do you want to be?” Bonus action free? Then maybe the Druid is first. Resource free? Then no, the Druid has to use wild shape.