I appreciate the position you are in and hold no ill will towards you in particular, but there is only ONE term I care to see right now. Whatever the new license agreement holds, what we all as a community NEED to see, without negotiation, is a public statement by WOTC that the OGL 1.0a will not and in fact cannot be revoked, ever. Nothing else can be discussed until we move past that.
I appreciate the position you are in and hold no ill will towards you in particular, but there is only ONE term I care to see right now. Whatever the new license agreement holds, what we all as a community NEED to see, without negotiation, is a public statement by WOTC that the OGL 1.0a will not and in fact cannot be revoked, ever. Nothing else can be discussed until we move past that.
it can be revoked unless you produced stuff under it, though the offer of it can be, plus needs rewriting, even lawyers on our side about how the 1.1 release was really bad and shouldnt exist, look at the 1.0a document and go "holy shit this document is bad for everyone because it doesnt state what is protected and whats not"
what we need, is a new ogl, but one that has our rights explicelty stated and whats explicitly protected
Not the lawyers I've been listening to. They have looked at it and seen what it says as clear. We don't need a new OGL.
Also, DO NOT ENGAGE IN THIS SURVEY. This is an attempt to pull the conversation into a channel they control. Don't let them. Keep up the fight on public channels.
Not the lawyers I've been listening to. They have looked at it and seen what it says as clear. We don't need a new OGL.
Also, DO NOT ENGAGE IN THIS SURVEY. This is an attempt to pull the conversation into a channel they control. Don't let them. Keep up the fight on public channels.
theyve actively stated they both want us to take the survey and be decently loud about what we want...so no they arent trying to silence us
also cool. your lawyers are literally wrong, there are several very public lawyers alone who actively would disagree and are right
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I appreciate the position you are in and hold no ill will towards you in particular, but there is only ONE term I care to see right now. Whatever the new license agreement holds, what we all as a community NEED to see, without negotiation, is a public statement by WOTC that the OGL 1.0a will not and in fact cannot be revoked, ever. Nothing else can be discussed until we move past that.
it can be revoked unless you produced stuff under it, though the offer of it can be, plus needs rewriting, even lawyers on our side about how the 1.1 release was really bad and shouldnt exist, look at the 1.0a document and go "holy shit this document is bad for everyone because it doesnt state what is protected and whats not"
what we need, is a new ogl, but one that has our rights explicelty stated and whats explicitly protected
Not the lawyers I've been listening to. They have looked at it and seen what it says as clear. We don't need a new OGL.
Also, DO NOT ENGAGE IN THIS SURVEY. This is an attempt to pull the conversation into a channel they control. Don't let them. Keep up the fight on public channels.
theyve actively stated they both want us to take the survey and be decently loud about what we want...so no they arent trying to silence us
also cool. your lawyers are literally wrong, there are several very public lawyers alone who actively would disagree and are right