It seems like some in the "existing DDB builder is just fine, why are you complaining" camp think that those of us in the "Can we have a single, editable sheet" camp aren't expressing a valid experience.
Let me make this as clear as I can, step by step:
There is an existing character builder.
Some users find it a great experience.
Some users find it a fine experience.
Some users find it a poor experience.
Some users find it a horrible experience.
Some users from 3, 4, and 5 would like the option of a single, fillable sheet where we can see ALL options at one glance without having to jump around.
Users from group 6 are not asking that such an option replace the builder, but be offered as an alternative. There is NO reason the two cannot coexist.
Some users from groups 2 and 3 are suggesting that users from group 6 want to replace the builder. This is flat out untrue.
Some users form groups 2 and 3 are suggesting that the negative experience of users in groups 3, 4 and 5 are not valid experiences. This is either ignorance, or willful deceit. YOUR experience is not the only valid one, and in this case the experience and desires of group 6 does not in any way infringe upon your experience, or your use of the builder.
ENVARIS: We are not comparing the experience of the builder to using physical books. Your argument is what's known as "a straw man". We are comparing the experience of a tabbed builder to a single digital sheet with pull-down menues and buttons for automating the character building process that would pull the info from the DDB database just like the builder, but with a different UI/UX.
Why do those of you who think the current builder is fine/good/great want to stop those of us who want a single fillable sheet from getting that? It doesn't hurt you in any way.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
forged anvil they are the smart people