I'm wondering if its reasonable to allow any class to use Unarmored defense as a feat . Rules would work the same as for Monk or Barb. 10+ either Dex , Con, Wis modifier.
There are many reasons I'm against this idea, but I'm not going to list them down, that's not the question at matter here. In terms of mathematical balance, I think it's balanced, perhaps even underwhelming considering all the other options you could get instead when you get that feat/ASI. If you want it for RP reasons, then the reasons that I only mentioned earlier would probably say you shouldn't anyway. Either way, again, it's balanced if it follows the normal rules of unarmored defence that monks/barbarians follow.
I'm wondering if its reasonable to allow any class to use Unarmored defense as a feat . Rules would work the same as for Monk or Barb. 10+ either Dex , Con, Wis modifier.
Any ideas if its reasonable / balanced ?
You already add dex, do you mean to allow someone to add it twice? Or do you mean 10+dex+(con or wis)?
There are many reasons I'm against this idea, but I'm not going to list them down, that's not the question at matter here. In terms of mathematical balance, I think it's balanced, perhaps even underwhelming considering all the other options you could get instead when you get that feat/ASI. If you want it for RP reasons, then the reasons that I only mentioned earlier would probably say you shouldn't anyway. Either way, again, it's balanced if it follows the normal rules of unarmored defence that monks/barbarians follow.
Varielky | Emma
If you want UD - just multiclass 1 level dip into Monk or Barbarian. I don't see the need for a feat.
Mega Yahtzee Thread:
Highest 41: brocker2001 (#11,285).
Yahtzee of 2's: Emmber (#36,161).
Lowest 9: JoeltheWalrus (#312), Emmber (#12,505) and Dertinus (#20,953).
Maybe they want it with archdruid feature.