I thought D&D beyond said they were gonna put all new UA content into D&D beyond. Is there a reason the new UA content is not on here? Or are they taking longer to put it into the site? :o
They can take longer than a week. They'll get there. Just gotta be patient. I started a similar thread for the additional Artificer subclasses earlier this year.
If you look in the pinned message on this section of the forums they have said that they will only do the UA classes when a new version comes out like how we got Artificer
while we're on it, was there ever an official reason stated as to why they wont add older UA stuff? or at least Revised Ranger? :o
Adding to what EnderGrimm says, the reason they don't go backwards and retroactively add older UAs is because UAs are testing material, and chances are if it is older than a certain date they will never be officially released. For example, Jeremy Crawford has stated that the Revised Ranger is dead.
aww, the revised ranger is really dead? That sucks, cause it was so much better, more freeing D:
The surveys showed most people only thought the Beast enclave needed revising and not the entire class. So instead of "fixing" the entire class for a single subclass they decided that if they were going to make any revisions it would be for the beast enclave only.
did they release anything to make the beast enclave better at least?
and im surprised that's the only thing people liked about revised, it made everything about ranger feel less restricting and more open, i almost exclusively use revised ranger lol
I thought D&D beyond said they were gonna put all new UA content into D&D beyond. Is there a reason the new UA content is not on here? Or are they taking longer to put it into the site? :o
It's probably just taking some time for them to program, especially considering the new UAs just dropped recently.
ah okies, thank you for the heads up, was getting worried they changed policy again or something lol
Nah, it is usually a week after it drops, so I wouldn't start worrying until the end of next week.
They can take longer than a week. They'll get there. Just gotta be patient. I started a similar thread for the additional Artificer subclasses earlier this year.
while we're on it, was there ever an official reason stated as to why they wont add older UA stuff? or at least Revised Ranger? :o
If you look in the pinned message on this section of the forums they have said that they will only do the UA classes when a new version comes out like how we got Artificer
Adding to what EnderGrimm says, the reason they don't go backwards and retroactively add older UAs is because UAs are testing material, and chances are if it is older than a certain date they will never be officially released. For example, Jeremy Crawford has stated that the Revised Ranger is dead.
aww, the revised ranger is really dead? That sucks, cause it was so much better, more freeing D:
The surveys showed most people only thought the Beast enclave needed revising and not the entire class. So instead of "fixing" the entire class for a single subclass they decided that if they were going to make any revisions it would be for the beast enclave only.
did they release anything to make the beast enclave better at least?
and im surprised that's the only thing people liked about revised, it made everything about ranger feel less restricting and more open, i almost exclusively use revised ranger lol
They made a few changes to the Players Handbook errata. The big changes I can see are:
You can have a look here: https://media.wizards.com/2018/dnd/downloads/PH-Errata.pdf
interesting thing, never heard of Errata before.
Though too bad it doesnt bring over the changes to Favored Terrain and Enemies