Your analogy remains weak. If you can't see why, mechanically, there might be a differentiation between "you cast a spell, and then you have an action in future turns that you might use for an attack" and "you cast a spell, which causes you to immediately make an attack with special conditions and bonuses", then I don't think there's a productive discussion to be had.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Your analogy remains weak. If you can't see why, mechanically, there might be a differentiation between "you cast a spell, and then you have an action in future turns that you might use for an attack" and "you cast a spell, which causes you to immediately make an attack with special conditions and bonuses", then I don't think there's a productive discussion to be had.