People have been asking for custom classes for years. DDB has said they're working on it for years. There has so far been no change or clear image of if/when that will ever happen.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Leaving OGL 1.0(a) untouched and making SRD 5.1 CC-BY-4.0 is a great first step. The next is a promise to do the same for future editions. Here's a discussion thread on that.
A little less criticism and more "lets put it to a vote and see what happens" would be nice, instead of whatever this clout chasing behavior is that people tend to exhibit on these forums.
Yall aint gonna see the changes you want in the app UNLESS YOU ASK FOR IT. That's the point of this post [REDACTED]
Notes: Please keep commentary respectful and constructive.
People have been asking for custom classes for years. DDB has said they're working on it for years. There has so far been no change or clear image of if/when that will ever happen.
I’ve never heard DDB staff say they are working on custom classes. Originally the réponse was essentially “not going to happen.” Eventually, after lots of requests, it became more along the lines of “we might consider it in the future.”
Yall aint gonna see the changes you want in the app UNLESS YOU ASK FOR IT. That's the point of this post [REDACTED]
People *have* been asking. For a LONG time.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Leaving OGL 1.0(a) untouched and making SRD 5.1 CC-BY-4.0 is a great first step. The next is a promise to do the same for future editions. Here's a discussion thread on that.
A couple requests or concerns I've recently expressed to the DDB team. What are your thoughts?
People have been asking for custom classes for years. DDB has said they're working on it for years. There has so far been no change or clear image of if/when that will ever happen.
Leaving OGL 1.0(a) untouched and making SRD 5.1 CC-BY-4.0 is a great first step. The next is a promise to do the same for future editions. Here's a discussion thread on that.
#OpenDnD
DDB is great, but it could be better. Here are some things I think could improve DDB
Yes but that was Fandom, not WOTC. My hope is if enough of us indicate that desire maybe WOTC will come through on this.
/sigh
A little less criticism and more "lets put it to a vote and see what happens" would be nice, instead of whatever this clout chasing behavior is that people tend to exhibit on these forums.
Yall aint gonna see the changes you want in the app UNLESS YOU ASK FOR IT. That's the point of this post [REDACTED]
I’ve never heard DDB staff say they are working on custom classes. Originally the réponse was essentially “not going to happen.” Eventually, after lots of requests, it became more along the lines of “we might consider it in the future.”
Trying to Decide if DDB is for you? A few helpful threads: A Buyer's Guide to DDB; What I/We Bought and Why; How some DMs use DDB; A Newer Thread on Using DDB to Play
Helpful threads on other topics: Homebrew FAQ by IamSposta; Accessing Content by ConalTheGreat;
Check your entitlements here. | Support Ticket LInk
People *have* been asking. For a LONG time.
Leaving OGL 1.0(a) untouched and making SRD 5.1 CC-BY-4.0 is a great first step. The next is a promise to do the same for future editions. Here's a discussion thread on that.
#OpenDnD
DDB is great, but it could be better. Here are some things I think could improve DDB
I would like a toggle that says, "only my homebrew is available in my campaign " clicking "allow homebrew" has my players wanting plasma guns :)
Avid DnD Player since 1977
https://www.dndbeyond.com/forums/d-d-beyond-general/d-d-beyond-feedback/99983-homebrew-collection-folders-sharing-control