I've got a Gem of Seeing, which automatically gives me 120 ft. Truesight. It's supposed to only give me that when I spend a charge and use the item, so I just unequip it to remove the erroneous Truesight. However, when I unequip it, it also unattunes.
Unequipping an attuned item should leave it attuned. I don't see any reason for the states to be linked.
I think it's tied to the fact that you have to equip an item before you can attune; that is probably the restriction.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Hello! Call meTana. My pronouns are She/They. I am a teenager. I have Autism and ADHD. And, you would probably call me Trans Femme, Genderfae/Demigirl, Pansexual pancake, and Ace I will mother you if you are being stupid. ALL HAIL MERLIN! [roll]1d4[/roll] + [roll]1d4[/roll] + [roll]1d4[/roll] + [roll]1d4[/roll] + [roll]1d4[/roll] + [roll]1d4[/roll] = [roll][roll:-6]+[roll:-5]+[roll:-4]+[roll:-3]+[roll:-2]+[roll:-1][/roll] I have adopted Golden, Salem, Wes, Aspen, Link, and Foalin.
Have the requirements for attunement changed in 5.5? In 5.0 you had to be in physical contact with the item for the duration of a short rest, but didn't have to equip it. You could, for instance, hold the ring in your hand or wear it on a necklace for the attunement period, and that would qualify to allow you to attune to it.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I've got a Gem of Seeing, which automatically gives me 120 ft. Truesight. It's supposed to only give me that when I spend a charge and use the item, so I just unequip it to remove the erroneous Truesight. However, when I unequip it, it also unattunes.
Unequipping an attuned item should leave it attuned. I don't see any reason for the states to be linked.
I think it's tied to the fact that you have to equip an item before you can attune; that is probably the restriction.
Hello! Call me Tana.
My pronouns are She/They.
I am a teenager. I have Autism and ADHD. And, you would probably call me Trans Femme, Genderfae/Demigirl, Pansexual pancake, and Ace
I will mother you if you are being stupid.
ALL HAIL MERLIN! [roll]1d4[/roll] + [roll]1d4[/roll] + [roll]1d4[/roll] + [roll]1d4[/roll] + [roll]1d4[/roll] + [roll]1d4[/roll] = [roll][roll:-6]+[roll:-5]+[roll:-4]+[roll:-3]+[roll:-2]+[roll:-1][/roll]
I have adopted Golden, Salem, Wes, Aspen, Link, and Foalin.
Have the requirements for attunement changed in 5.5? In 5.0 you had to be in physical contact with the item for the duration of a short rest, but didn't have to equip it. You could, for instance, hold the ring in your hand or wear it on a necklace for the attunement period, and that would qualify to allow you to attune to it.