Is there a way to change the default search parameter in Spells, Monsters, etc for partnered content?
The default is "no", but since I DM two Exandria campaignes it would be really helpful if we could change the default in the profile or something like that.
Sorry for the thread necromancy - but really there should be a way to LEAVE the option set to "yes" by default if I choose to. It's kind of inconvenient to have to reset the filters every time I want to browse monsters from Tome of Beasts or Lairs of Etharis for example.
This needs to be a feature. You guys are making partnered content more and more available - so why are you treating it like a invisible child that you want to hide in the closet Harry Potter style?
I wanted to keep this going, there really needs to be a way to default partner content on in general searches. Or allow advanced searches from the general search page.
Bumping this again--every time I search monsters, I want to include partnered content. Even just moving the toggle out of "advanced filters" would be preferable. But it seems odd that there isn't an account-wide setting to keep it enabled.
The DDB searching has been buggy for a while and useless when looking into forums. I don't know how much it may help, but I now use a search engine and tag it to only search this site when I look for content. It doesn't necessarily break down the other filters, but it does include partner content.
Example: Google search, look up "Bol'bara website:dndbeyond.com" and you'll get the results for Bol'bara's monster stat block from Explorer's Guide to Wildemount.
It might work with specific names like Bol'bara, but try to search for something like "ravenous void" or just "void" because you didn't know exactly how the spell was called or something like that.
This should have been implemented long ago. I've paid for books I’d like to not have them hidden from me. Even from a marketing point this is bad, want people to buy more content, well they have to see it.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Is there a way to change the default search parameter in Spells, Monsters, etc for partnered content?
The default is "no", but since I DM two Exandria campaignes it would be really helpful if we could change the default in the profile or something like that.
AFAIK, not exactly, but you can apply the filter and bookmark the page.
Sorry for the thread necromancy - but really there should be a way to LEAVE the option set to "yes" by default if I choose to. It's kind of inconvenient to have to reset the filters every time I want to browse monsters from Tome of Beasts or Lairs of Etharis for example.
Yes, with the new partnered contend it's even more important that we get that option.
Please make this happen.
Has this been updated yet?
This needs to be a feature. You guys are making partnered content more and more available - so why are you treating it like a invisible child that you want to hide in the closet Harry Potter style?
I wanted to keep this going, there really needs to be a way to default partner content on in general searches. Or allow advanced searches from the general search page.
Bumping for great justice!
Bumping this again--every time I search monsters, I want to include partnered content. Even just moving the toggle out of "advanced filters" would be preferable. But it seems odd that there isn't an account-wide setting to keep it enabled.
The DDB searching has been buggy for a while and useless when looking into forums. I don't know how much it may help, but I now use a search engine and tag it to only search this site when I look for content. It doesn't necessarily break down the other filters, but it does include partner content.
Example: Google search, look up "Bol'bara website:dndbeyond.com" and you'll get the results for Bol'bara's monster stat block from Explorer's Guide to Wildemount.
It might work with specific names like Bol'bara, but try to search for something like "ravenous void" or just "void" because you didn't know exactly how the spell was called or something like that.
Also not very comfortable... :-(
This should have been implemented long ago. I've paid for books I’d like to not have them hidden from me. Even from a marketing point this is bad, want people to buy more content, well they have to see it.