I wasn’t really sure where would be a reasonable place to post about this and I am hoping someone from WotC and Hasbro(it’s most likely a Hasbro call) sees this. Firstly I would like to say kudos on many of the changes since the OGL debacle, credit where credit is due there but I personally think it is bad taste to lock some of the subclass updates into the universes beyond releases. I can understand wanting to get the content out there and I can understand following the thematics, but it just comes off as a blatant way to try to forcibly keep your core audience buying a book while also trying to hook extra fandoms in. That sounds perfectly reasonable in a board room, but in practice it will alienate your existing base if you overdo it. If you still had the microtransactions where you could buy just a single subclass or a single feat out of a book on dndbeyond the issue would be mitigated somewhat, or even an end of year mini book anthology of the player facing options like (and I’m probably going to show my age here) “NOW that’s what I call subclasses 2026” ect. I personally will not be buying the WOW book as I have no interest in running a game in that setting and I do not want to reward what I view as a business decision impacting the way the game operates. If anyone out there feels similarly make sure to chime in, but please keep it respectful and not just a “WotC bad ugh ugh”
I don't see updates in the Warcraft book as any different than updates in a Forgotten Realms book -- they're both books that people who don't run the setting are less interested in buying. Swashbuckler is no different to Bladesinger for me.
Now, I expect that we're eventually going to see a new book like Tasha's at some point, which gathers up many of the setting-locked player options into a general-purpose book. That has been the way of things for the 5e era. If I need the options right now, I can buy the book. If I'm content to wait, I can wait. (I wait, but I also have the advantage of somebody who buys most of the books in my play-group constellation.)
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I wasn’t really sure where would be a reasonable place to post about this and I am hoping someone from WotC and Hasbro(it’s most likely a Hasbro call) sees this. Firstly I would like to say kudos on many of the changes since the OGL debacle, credit where credit is due there but I personally think it is bad taste to lock some of the subclass updates into the universes beyond releases. I can understand wanting to get the content out there and I can understand following the thematics, but it just comes off as a blatant way to try to forcibly keep your core audience buying a book while also trying to hook extra fandoms in. That sounds perfectly reasonable in a board room, but in practice it will alienate your existing base if you overdo it. If you still had the microtransactions where you could buy just a single subclass or a single feat out of a book on dndbeyond the issue would be mitigated somewhat, or even an end of year mini book anthology of the player facing options like (and I’m probably going to show my age here) “NOW that’s what I call subclasses 2026” ect. I personally will not be buying the WOW book as I have no interest in running a game in that setting and I do not want to reward what I view as a business decision impacting the way the game operates. If anyone out there feels similarly make sure to chime in, but please keep it respectful and not just a “WotC bad ugh ugh”
Splatbooks have apparently have been off the menu since Dan Ayoub took over WotC.
Think of that what you will.
DM, player & homebrewer(Current homebrew project is an unofficial conversion of SBURB/SGRUB from Homestuck into DND 5e)
Once made Maxwell's Silver Hammer come down upon Strahd's head to make sure he was dead.
Always study & sharpen philosophical razors. They save a lot of trouble.
I don't see updates in the Warcraft book as any different than updates in a Forgotten Realms book -- they're both books that people who don't run the setting are less interested in buying. Swashbuckler is no different to Bladesinger for me.
Now, I expect that we're eventually going to see a new book like Tasha's at some point, which gathers up many of the setting-locked player options into a general-purpose book. That has been the way of things for the 5e era. If I need the options right now, I can buy the book. If I'm content to wait, I can wait. (I wait, but I also have the advantage of somebody who buys most of the books in my play-group constellation.)