The Dragonmark feat prequisites and Mark of Healing's Spells of the Mark have been fixed!
Im glad to hear some of the dragonmark feats are working but the Mark of Warding from the House Kundarak Heir background is still not working. I still cannot add the feats spells to my wizard’s spellbook.
Im glad to hear some of the dragonmark feats are working but the Mark of Warding from the House Kundarak Heir background is still not working. I still cannot add the feats spells to my wizard’s spellbook.
Those all work fine for me. 🤔
Does it happen with all spells, or just certain ones? Do you own the book that contains those spells?
Does removing and re-adding the feat make a difference?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Need help with D&D Beyond? Come ask in the official D&D server on Discord: https://discord.gg/dnd
Owning the book is a great point. Armor of Agathys isn't in the Basic Rules, so if that spell was used to determine availability, that could be the reason.
The other spells would be available for free though, so if they're missing, that isn't the main issue.
Thanks for the suggestion and sorry everyone for the late reply but removing the background and adding it back worked for me. To be more precise in case someone else reads this and it doesn’t work for them, I selected House Jorasco Heir and then went to my character sheet. Then I went back into manage character and levels and selected House Kundarak Heir again. Thanks everyone.
It seems like it is still not possible to select any swords when choosing the flame tongue magic item plans, only weapons that are not swords. Is there any Update on that?
In addition to the previously noted Artificer bugs, the Strength version of the Dreadnaught Armorer's Force Demolisher is showing the wrong range. It lists 5ft, when it has the Reach property and should be 10ft. The Intelligence version shows the correct range. It's not a huge problem, since anyone using Strength to attack will have found a Strength boosting item and is likely experienced enough with the Intelligence based attack that they will know about having Reach, but it would be nice for it to display properly.
This should be a much easier fix compared to most of the other remaining bugs (I assume it's a tag or field that wasn't correctly configured), so hopefully it can be fixed soon despite not being particularly urgent.
The fix for the issue I mentioned seems to have broken the Strength Force Demolisher worse. It has the reach property now but no to hit roll, and doesn't add strength to the damage roll. It also still deals fire damage instead of force (see post #467).
It went from annoying but minor to totally broken, which is very frustrating considering I was thinking about playing that character in an AL 1-shot this Tuesday.
The way the Artillerist's Martial Ranged weapon proficiency is implemented (adding the proficiency for each individual Martial Ranged weapon) means that any 3rd-party content that adds Martial Ranged weapons (such as Valda's Gunslinger pack or the Steinhardt's book) is not included by default. It would be helpful if Martial Ranged weapons were included as an actual category the same way Martial weapons are.
The way the Artillerist's Martial Ranged weapon proficiency is implemented (adding the proficiency for each individual Martial Ranged weapon) means that any 3rd-party content that adds Martial Ranged weapons (such as Valda's Gunslinger pack or the Steinhardt's book) is not included by default. It would be helpful if Martial Ranged weapons were included as an actual category the same way Martial weapons are.
I don't think that's something the system currently supports. In the meantime, though, you can click the Proficiencies & Languages box, then use the sidebar to manually add proficiency for that weapon.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Need help with D&D Beyond? Come ask in the official D&D server on Discord: https://discord.gg/dnd
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
They could, but they didn’t
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
ModeratorThe Dragonmark feat prequisites and Mark of Healing's Spells of the Mark have been fixed!
Need help with D&D Beyond? Come ask in the official D&D server on Discord: https://discord.gg/dnd
So what you're saying is... they're playable.
Alternatively, here's a homebrew one with different options: https://www.dndbeyond.com/species/2151403-jhorguntaal
The possibilities are... endless, because D&D is a game where you make the rules.
They are in third party/partnered content. Not in official 5.5 material
Boon of Siberys (Dragonmark Spell) says that the spell will always be prepared but it doesn't show up in the spell list as a prepared spell.
Im glad to hear some of the dragonmark feats are working but the Mark of Warding from the House Kundarak Heir background is still not working. I still cannot add the feats spells to my wizard’s spellbook.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
ModeratorThose all work fine for me. 🤔
Does it happen with all spells, or just certain ones? Do you own the book that contains those spells?
Does removing and re-adding the feat make a difference?
Need help with D&D Beyond? Come ask in the official D&D server on Discord: https://discord.gg/dnd
Owning the book is a great point. Armor of Agathys isn't in the Basic Rules, so if that spell was used to determine availability, that could be the reason.
The other spells would be available for free though, so if they're missing, that isn't the main issue.
Thanks for the suggestion and sorry everyone for the late reply but removing the background and adding it back worked for me. To be more precise in case someone else reads this and it doesn’t work for them, I selected House Jorasco Heir and then went to my character sheet. Then I went back into manage character and levels and selected House Kundarak Heir again. Thanks everyone.
It seems like it is still not possible to select any swords when choosing the flame tongue magic item plans, only weapons that are not swords. Is there any Update on that?
so many of the illustrations are still insanely low res. that's beyond frustrating.
The fix for the issue I mentioned seems to have broken the Strength Force Demolisher worse. It has the reach property now but no to hit roll, and doesn't add strength to the damage roll. It also still deals fire damage instead of force (see post #467).
It went from annoying but minor to totally broken, which is very frustrating considering I was thinking about playing that character in an AL 1-shot this Tuesday.
The way the Artillerist's Martial Ranged weapon proficiency is implemented (adding the proficiency for each individual Martial Ranged weapon) means that any 3rd-party content that adds Martial Ranged weapons (such as Valda's Gunslinger pack or the Steinhardt's book) is not included by default. It would be helpful if Martial Ranged weapons were included as an actual category the same way Martial weapons are.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
ModeratorI don't think that's something the system currently supports. In the meantime, though, you can click the Proficiencies & Languages box, then use the sidebar to manually add proficiency for that weapon.
Need help with D&D Beyond? Come ask in the official D&D server on Discord: https://discord.gg/dnd