I went to make a "Mark of Warding Abjuration Wizard" and I noticed that the "Armor of Agathys" spell is not showing up in the "Manage Spells" menu. "Mark of Warding" Dwarfs are supposed to have "Armor of Agathys" added to their list via the "Spells of the Mark" class feature" You can see it on this character: ddb.ac/characters/23434433/FKjSad
Please Help!
Thanks
Please see the first post of this thread, thank you! 😊
Just curious if there has been an update to this, like maybe an ETA? It's been 5 months since this content launched and it still being broken without any comment as to when it will even be addressed is ridiculous.
I realize that I can just create my own content and achieve the same results. But, I paid for the content to support the site and WotC, and so I didn't have to deal with any of that homebrew noise for an official race.
I apologize in advance if this has been discussed somewhere before in this topic, but there are 34 pages now, and I don't have time to dig through all of them...
I was playing around with the Artificer class with a character that had the Revenant Blade feat, and noticed that a Revenant Double-Bladed Scimitar is not in the list of items that can receive the Enchanted Weapon Infusion. Is this by design due to some rule somewhere, or has it just been overlooked up until now?
I apologize in advance if this has been discussed somewhere before in this topic, but there are 34 pages now, and I don't have time to dig through all of them...
I was playing around with the Artificer class with a character that had the Revenant Blade feat, and noticed that a Revenant Double-Bladed Scimitar is not in the list of items that can receive the Enchanted Weapon Infusion. Is this by design due to some rule somewhere, or has it just been overlooked up until now?
Thank you.
Hello! This is a known issue, and a ticket has been raised for this. Your scimitar should be a valid selection for infusions. Thanks for the report!
In the Khorvaire Gazetteer Section -> Eldeen Reaches page -> Interesting Things About the Eldeen Reaches section -> Third Bullet Point -> Second to the last sentence:
"Goodberry wine takes the place of House Vadalis healing." (Bold text mine)...
Should the text reference House Jorasco (Mark of Healing) instead of House Vadalis (Mark of Handling) regarding the above sentence/entry?
Apologies in advance if this issue is already being addressed. I tried using the search function under this tread and others...or most likely my Search Fu skill roll was not high enough.
Hope all of you are doing ok during the COVID-19 Lock Down/Social Distancing/Quarantine.
Sincerely,
Roman Picardo
P.S. I am totally enjoying the re-release of the Eberron world setting and hope there is more to come! I'll be crossing my fingers for the Dark Sun setting which I still have the two boxed sets!
In the Khorvaire Gazetteer Section -> Eldeen Reaches page -> Interesting Things About the Eldeen Reaches section -> Third Bullet Point -> Second to the last sentence:
"Goodberry wine takes the place of House Vadalis healing." (Bold text mine)...
Should the text reference House Jorasco (Mark of Healing) instead of House Vadalis (Mark of Handling) regarding the above sentence/entry?
Apologies in advance if this issue is already being addressed. I tried using the search function under this tread and others...or most likely my Search Fu skill roll was not high enough.
D&D Beyond is accurately reproducing what the physical book (p. 115) says there - so if it's a typo/error, it's one on WotC's part. You might have to ask Jeremy Crawford or Keith Baker about that one.
I went to make a "Mark of Warding Abjuration Wizard" and I noticed that the "Armor of Agathys" spell is not showing up in the "Manage Spells" menu. "Mark of Warding" Dwarfs are supposed to have "Armor of Agathys" added to their list via the "Spells of the Mark" class feature" You can see it on this character: ddb.ac/characters/23434433/FKjSad
Please Help!
Thanks
Please see the first post of this thread, thank you! 😊
Just curious if there has been an update to this, like maybe an ETA? It's been 5 months since this content launched and it still being broken without any comment as to when it will even be addressed is ridiculous.
I realize that I can just create my own content and achieve the same results. But, I paid for the content to support the site and WotC, and so I didn't have to deal with any of that homebrew noise for an official race.
They give regular schedule updates on Adam Bradford’s weekly “Dev Update streams. At the moment, they’re hard at work completely revising the character sheet infrastructure so that features like Spells of the Mark don’t cause hard to resolve issues with the sheet. Hopefully that’ll be done in the next month or two, at which point Spells of the Mark can be properly implemented. In the meantime, the feature can be recreated using the homebrew system.
They give regular schedule updates on Adam Bradford’s weekly “Dev Update streams. At the moment, they’re hard at work completely revising the character sheet infrastructure so that features like Spells of the Mark don’t cause hard to resolve issues with the sheet. Hopefully that’ll be done in the next month or two, at which point Spells of the Mark can be properly implemented. In the meantime, the feature can be recreated using the homebrew system.
This is basically just regurgitating the first page and not contributing to the discussion. The main issue is that they have not discussed the issue on the last few dev updates. In fact they haven't mentioned the Spells of the Mark for some time now.
Its one thing for UA content its another for paid content and honestly having us homebrew something to fix the issue seems like a big cop out. They should at least create the items for us as I don't have time to go in and make all of these in homebrew and honestly I shouldn't have to.
I believe I’ve found an issue with the Artificer’s repeating shot. The description stats that a +1 will be added to attack and damage rolls. However a member of my campaign infused a light crossbow and received a +4 to hit and damage. I then created my own Artificer and received a +2 when I infused my light crossbow with repeating shot.
Public Mod Note
(Stormknight):
moved from EGtW thread.
I believe I’ve found an issue with the Artificer’s repeating shot. The description stats that a +1 will be added to attack and damage rolls. However a member of my campaign infused a light crossbow and received a +4 to hit and damage. I then created my own Artificer and received a +2 when I infused my light crossbow with repeating shot.
I am unable to duplicate this issue - please provide the url of the character sheet for your character, so we can take a look (not the share link - just the address of the character sheet).
Its not your fault and I don't blame you for the delay. However, I know what the page says and I know you are likely just trying to be helpful so thank you for that.
Its just a bit frustrating at this point as its been 4 and a half months since release with little progress.
I share your frustration. Spells of the mark is an amazing and flavorful feature, and I’d prefer not to need to clutter up my homebrew page trying to make it work.
I believe I’ve found an issue with the Artificer’s repeating shot. The description stats that a +1 will be added to attack and damage rolls. However a member of my campaign infused a light crossbow and received a +4 to hit and damage. I then created my own Artificer and received a +2 when I infused my light crossbow with repeating shot.
What are the subclasses of your artificer and theirs? If they're a battle smith and you're not, this may be the reasoning. A battle smith can use their intelligence in place of strength or dexterity for attack and damage with magic items. This would mean a 3rd level battle smith with a +3 int mod would have a total of +6 to hit (+2 prof, +3 int mod, +1 infusion) and a +4 to damage (+3 int mod, +1 infusion). If a non battle smith also did this, and had a dex of +1, the to hit would total to +4 (+2 prof, +1 dex mod, +1 infusion) and the damage would total to +2 (+1 dex mod, +1 infusion).
This is the only way I could understand the discrepancy.
An imbued wood focus is a rod, staff, or wand cut from a tree infused with extraplanar energy. If you’re a spellcaster, you can use this orb as a spellcasting focus.
Note that it says "rod, staff, or wand", then "you can use this orb"; is this an error, as it is a contradiction? [Edit: have confirmed this is the same in the hard copy, so if anything it's in need of errata.]
Second, each Imbued Wood Focus still lists the source of the item (in the bottom right of that page) as Wayfinder's Guide to Eberron.
Presumably it's so you don't have to remember the name of the person in order to find the spell alphabetically in your list.
Those are the versions in the Basic Rules. Certain content is considered "Product Identity" (like the names of the wizards and certain monsters like the beholder and mind flayer) and aren't included in the SRD. Hence the generic versions of the spells.
Just curious if there has been an update to this, like maybe an ETA? It's been 5 months since this content launched and it still being broken without any comment as to when it will even be addressed is ridiculous.
I realize that I can just create my own content and achieve the same results. But, I paid for the content to support the site and WotC, and so I didn't have to deal with any of that homebrew noise for an official race.
I apologize in advance if this has been discussed somewhere before in this topic, but there are 34 pages now, and I don't have time to dig through all of them...
I was playing around with the Artificer class with a character that had the Revenant Blade feat, and noticed that a Revenant Double-Bladed Scimitar is not in the list of items that can receive the Enchanted Weapon Infusion. Is this by design due to some rule somewhere, or has it just been overlooked up until now?
Thank you.
Hello! This is a known issue, and a ticket has been raised for this. Your scimitar should be a valid selection for infusions. Thanks for the report!
Greetings D&DB Team & Moderators!
In the Khorvaire Gazetteer Section -> Eldeen Reaches page -> Interesting Things About the Eldeen Reaches section -> Third Bullet Point -> Second to the last sentence:
"Goodberry wine takes the place of House Vadalis healing." (Bold text mine)...
Should the text reference House Jorasco (Mark of Healing) instead of House Vadalis (Mark of Handling) regarding the above sentence/entry?
Apologies in advance if this issue is already being addressed. I tried using the search function under this tread and others...or most likely my Search Fu skill roll was not high enough.
Hope all of you are doing ok during the COVID-19 Lock Down/Social Distancing/Quarantine.
Sincerely,
Roman Picardo
P.S. I am totally enjoying the re-release of the Eberron world setting and hope there is more to come! I'll be crossing my fingers for the Dark Sun setting which I still have the two boxed sets!
RP
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
ModeratorD&D Beyond is accurately reproducing what the physical book (p. 115) says there - so if it's a typo/error, it's one on WotC's part. You might have to ask Jeremy Crawford or Keith Baker about that one.
Any response to this?
They give regular schedule updates on Adam Bradford’s weekly “Dev Update streams. At the moment, they’re hard at work completely revising the character sheet infrastructure so that features like Spells of the Mark don’t cause hard to resolve issues with the sheet. Hopefully that’ll be done in the next month or two, at which point Spells of the Mark can be properly implemented. In the meantime, the feature can be recreated using the homebrew system.
This is basically just regurgitating the first page and not contributing to the discussion. The main issue is that they have not discussed the issue on the last few dev updates. In fact they haven't mentioned the Spells of the Mark for some time now.
Its one thing for UA content its another for paid content and honestly having us homebrew something to fix the issue seems like a big cop out. They should at least create the items for us as I don't have time to go in and make all of these in homebrew and honestly I shouldn't have to.
I believe I’ve found an issue with the Artificer’s repeating shot. The description stats that a +1 will be added to attack and damage rolls. However a member of my campaign infused a light crossbow and received a +4 to hit and damage. I then created my own Artificer and received a +2 when I infused my light crossbow with repeating shot.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
D&D Beyond FoundersI am unable to duplicate this issue - please provide the url of the character sheet for your character, so we can take a look (not the share link - just the address of the character sheet).
Pun-loving nerd | Faith Elisabeth Lilley | She/Her/Hers | Profile art by Becca Golins
If you need help with homebrew, please post on the homebrew forums, where multiple staff and moderators can read your post and help you!
"We got this, no problem! I'll take the twenty on the left - you guys handle the one on the right!"🔊
Sorry I said anything.
Its not your fault and I don't blame you for the delay. However, I know what the page says and I know you are likely just trying to be helpful so thank you for that.
Its just a bit frustrating at this point as its been 4 and a half months since release with little progress.
I share your frustration. Spells of the mark is an amazing and flavorful feature, and I’d prefer not to need to clutter up my homebrew page trying to make it work.
What are the subclasses of your artificer and theirs? If they're a battle smith and you're not, this may be the reasoning. A battle smith can use their intelligence in place of strength or dexterity for attack and damage with magic items. This would mean a 3rd level battle smith with a +3 int mod would have a total of +6 to hit (+2 prof, +3 int mod, +1 infusion) and a +4 to damage (+3 int mod, +1 infusion). If a non battle smith also did this, and had a dex of +1, the to hit would total to +4 (+2 prof, +1 dex mod, +1 infusion) and the damage would total to +2 (+1 dex mod, +1 infusion).
This is the only way I could understand the discrepancy.
Hi,
Two errors(?) to report:
Imbued Wood Focus reads:
Note that it says "rod, staff, or wand", then "you can use this orb"; is this an error, as it is a contradiction? [Edit: have confirmed this is the same in the hard copy, so if anything it's in need of errata.]
Second, each Imbued Wood Focus still lists the source of the item (in the bottom right of that page) as Wayfinder's Guide to Eberron.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
D&D Beyond FoundersHi QQMcRage,
thanks for taking the time to let us know! I did a quick check and the text is as published in the sourcebook, also the source is correct.
Pun-loving nerd | Faith Elisabeth Lilley | She/Her/Hers | Profile art by Becca Golins
If you need help with homebrew, please post on the homebrew forums, where multiple staff and moderators can read your post and help you!
"We got this, no problem! I'll take the twenty on the left - you guys handle the one on the right!"🔊
Hey, does anyone know why my Alchemist Artificer now has both "Acid Arrow" and "Melf's Acid Arrow" available to them?
They're the same spell; a bunch of the spells named for people (e.g. Leomund's Tiny Hut; Mordenkainen's Magnificent Mansion) have a duplicate version that is functionally identical, but without the name attribution (Tiny Hut; Magnificent Mansion).
Presumably it's so you don't have to remember the name of the person in order to find the spell alphabetically in your list.
Those are the versions in the Basic Rules. Certain content is considered "Product Identity" (like the names of the wizards and certain monsters like the beholder and mind flayer) and aren't included in the SRD. Hence the generic versions of the spells.
https://www.dndbeyond.com/monsters/homunculus-servant
On the monster page for Homunculus Servant, it should be page 62 of Eberron, not the basic rules.