I agree, Elementals are not and should not be stationary like a wall spell. Lots of other Conjurations can move when the caster orders them to, so why not the elemental?
At a quick guess, it can't move because the idea was 'a trap spell that holds people and does damage' and the fact that it is an elemental is more flavoring than anything else.
Yes, other Conjurations can move around, but they don't Restrain people as a general rule. You could just as easily say 'other Conjurations can Restrain an enemy, so why not the celestial?' for Conjure Celestial.
Conjurations are a kind of weird area when you think about them. They typically occupy some kind of space but can be moved through and are usually immune to any and all attacks. Not just swords and bows, but Force, Cold, and anything else that would, in theory, be damaging to them. In both the case of Conjure Celestial and Conjure Elemental the Caster has to be able to see the Target to affect them. Even though the elemental is, theoretically, some kind of being, if the Caster has been Blinded or is around a corner the elemental is unable to attempt to Restrain anyone moving through it.
Please understand, I am not talking about whether the spell as it currently sits is balanced. That is an entirely separate tin of subterranean spaghetti. I am simply talking about the 'logic' of 'why can't the Conjuration do X'.
It has a decent area and last 10 minutes so you'd think its a big obstruction but it can only target 1 creature.
It does not seem to have a mechanic to stop restraining someone in case a better target comes along.
It is not clear if it stops restraining on death outside the rules logic that hey are no longer creatures and therefore no longer valid targets. And i am not fan of spells that require that kind of rules knowledge in their language.
Given that blight one level lower does 8d8 and that is it, its not a bad damage spell with a restrain attached. but why have it cover a 16 square area as its target if it only targets one person. why does it even have a 10 minute duration if its not mobile, especially since it can only stop one person so it does not work great as a barrier or obstruction
It falls into this weird zone if you are trying to lock a target down there are better options, if you are trying to do damage there are better options. But I guess it does both reasonably well. So its not bad. But it has a really weird design. like someone was designing the mechanic of a single target decent damage restrain and another person was designing the description or a large elemental that can hit anything in reach and they never spoke to one another, then the spell got put together into one spell.
It has a decent area and last 10 minutes so you'd think its a big obstruction but it can only target 1 creature...
It can only *restrain* one creature. It targets every creature in the area at the start of that creature's turn, or when it enters the area. It only stops targeting creatures when one of those creatures fails the save, survives the resulting damage, and is restrained. When the elemental is restraining a creature, then yes it stops targeting anything else. If that creature dies or escapes the restraint then the elemental starts targeting everything in the area again.
That is not the same function as trying to lock down one creature. It may not seem particularly powerful to you, but it should not be compared to the damage of blight or fireball, or the lock down power of hold monster - because it is a very different mechanic.
If you are trying to target a specific creature with this spell then you can choose to not have any creatures before your intended target roll the save, but yes after the save is rolled and failed then the Restrain cannot be undone. You can, of course, reset the Restrain by killing the restrained creature yourself.
It has a decent area and last 10 minutes so you'd think its a big obstruction but it can only target 1 creature...
It can only *restrain* one creature. It targets every creature in the area at the start of that creature's turn, or when it enters the area. It only stops targeting creatures when one of those creatures fails the save, survives the resulting damage, and is restrained. When the elemental is restraining a creature, then yes it stops targeting anything else. If that creature dies or escapes the restraint then the elemental starts targeting everything in the area again.
...That sounds like a distinction without a difference though. It does seem like it will be a big obstacle, but then it only ever hurts zero or 1 creature per turn. I'd say it's fair to call that not much of an obstacle. My money is also on the fact that creatures you're battling at this tier of play aren't often getting dropped by 8d8 (or 36) damage. (I'm at least glad you have some different damage types to choose from.)
8d8 is not nothing, especially because you have the chance to deal it to different targets over time. But it feels like you're going to have only very specific situations when you can cast cast this for more than one or two instances of damage. It's double the damage of Bigby's Hand (also 5th level), and it's more efficient (the damage and restraining happen in the same instant as opposed to the damage and grappling of the Hand)... but the Hand is going to be useful in 90% of encounters, whereas this... isn't (in my opinion).
Great flavor; I'm glad they made all the changes to the conjure spells to provide more variety. It's just too restricted for my taste.
It can only *restrain* one creature. It targets every creature in the area at the start of that creature's turn, or when it enters the area. It only stops targeting creatures when one of those creatures fails the save, survives the resulting damage, and is restrained. When the elemental is restraining a creature, then yes it stops targeting anything else. If that creature dies or escapes the restraint then the elemental starts targeting everything in the area again.
...That sounds like a distinction without a difference though. It does seem like it will be a big obstacle, but then it only ever hurts zero or 1 creature per turn. I'd say it's fair to call that not much of an obstacle. My money is also on the fact that creatures you're battling at this tier of play aren't often getting dropped by 8d8 (or 36) damage. (I'm at least glad you have some different damage types to choose from.)
8d8 is not nothing, especially because you have the chance to deal it to different targets over time. But it feels like you're going to have only very specific situations when you can cast cast this for more than one or two instances of damage. It's double the damage of Bigby's Hand (also 5th level), and it's more efficient (the damage and restraining happen in the same instant as opposed to the damage and grappling of the Hand)... but the Hand is going to be useful in 90% of encounters, whereas this... isn't (in my opinion).
Great flavor; I'm glad they made all the changes to the conjure spells to provide more variety. It's just too restricted for my taste.
Bigby's is definitely a more versatile spell, but note that using it requires every bonus action on every one of the caster's turns. It can grapple, not restrain, and one round later it can damage the grappled target.
The elemental is the spell which can damage multiple targets per round, and it requires no further actions/bonus/reactions. If it Restrains a target then your side has permanent advantage, helping you kill it before the end of the round and activating the elemental again. If there are no targets in the elemental area then the spell is doing its job - you can stand in that area and suffer no melee threats. I know that if I were an average creature I would not willingly walk into the elemental area - even if it was currently occupied restraining another target I would know I'd be next at the start of my turn.
This spell will generally not be useful in a situation where the enemies can deal more ranged damage than the party, but in an ongoing melee situation or to protect ranged PCs from melee threat, there are features to this spell that no other similar level spell can match.
(I will admit this is not a good conjuration spell for a conjuration specialist wizard, as it benefits from practically none of the features of that subclass, so it also means the Adept feat which grants it is less useful for the subclass - but for a druid, another wizard or any other caster who takes the feat, it will be one of their most powerful conjuration spells)
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
At a quick guess, it can't move because the idea was 'a trap spell that holds people and does damage' and the fact that it is an elemental is more flavoring than anything else.
Yes, other Conjurations can move around, but they don't Restrain people as a general rule. You could just as easily say 'other Conjurations can Restrain an enemy, so why not the celestial?' for Conjure Celestial.
Conjurations are a kind of weird area when you think about them. They typically occupy some kind of space but can be moved through and are usually immune to any and all attacks. Not just swords and bows, but Force, Cold, and anything else that would, in theory, be damaging to them. In both the case of Conjure Celestial and Conjure Elemental the Caster has to be able to see the Target to affect them. Even though the elemental is, theoretically, some kind of being, if the Caster has been Blinded or is around a corner the elemental is unable to attempt to Restrain anyone moving through it.
Please understand, I am not talking about whether the spell as it currently sits is balanced. That is an entirely separate tin of subterranean spaghetti. I am simply talking about the 'logic' of 'why can't the Conjuration do X'.
its a kind of weird spell.
It has a decent area and last 10 minutes so you'd think its a big obstruction but it can only target 1 creature.
It does not seem to have a mechanic to stop restraining someone in case a better target comes along.
It is not clear if it stops restraining on death outside the rules logic that hey are no longer creatures and therefore no longer valid targets. And i am not fan of spells that require that kind of rules knowledge in their language.
Given that blight one level lower does 8d8 and that is it, its not a bad damage spell with a restrain attached. but why have it cover a 16 square area as its target if it only targets one person. why does it even have a 10 minute duration if its not mobile, especially since it can only stop one person so it does not work great as a barrier or obstruction
It falls into this weird zone if you are trying to lock a target down there are better options, if you are trying to do damage there are better options. But I guess it does both reasonably well. So its not bad. But it has a really weird design. like someone was designing the mechanic of a single target decent damage restrain and another person was designing the description or a large elemental that can hit anything in reach and they never spoke to one another, then the spell got put together into one spell.
It can only *restrain* one creature. It targets every creature in the area at the start of that creature's turn, or when it enters the area. It only stops targeting creatures when one of those creatures fails the save, survives the resulting damage, and is restrained. When the elemental is restraining a creature, then yes it stops targeting anything else. If that creature dies or escapes the restraint then the elemental starts targeting everything in the area again.
That is not the same function as trying to lock down one creature. It may not seem particularly powerful to you, but it should not be compared to the damage of blight or fireball, or the lock down power of hold monster - because it is a very different mechanic.
If you are trying to target a specific creature with this spell then you can choose to not have any creatures before your intended target roll the save, but yes after the save is rolled and failed then the Restrain cannot be undone. You can, of course, reset the Restrain by killing the restrained creature yourself.
...That sounds like a distinction without a difference though. It does seem like it will be a big obstacle, but then it only ever hurts zero or 1 creature per turn. I'd say it's fair to call that not much of an obstacle. My money is also on the fact that creatures you're battling at this tier of play aren't often getting dropped by 8d8 (or 36) damage. (I'm at least glad you have some different damage types to choose from.)
8d8 is not nothing, especially because you have the chance to deal it to different targets over time. But it feels like you're going to have only very specific situations when you can cast cast this for more than one or two instances of damage. It's double the damage of Bigby's Hand (also 5th level), and it's more efficient (the damage and restraining happen in the same instant as opposed to the damage and grappling of the Hand)... but the Hand is going to be useful in 90% of encounters, whereas this... isn't (in my opinion).
Great flavor; I'm glad they made all the changes to the conjure spells to provide more variety. It's just too restricted for my taste.
Bigby's is definitely a more versatile spell, but note that using it requires every bonus action on every one of the caster's turns. It can grapple, not restrain, and one round later it can damage the grappled target.
The elemental is the spell which can damage multiple targets per round, and it requires no further actions/bonus/reactions. If it Restrains a target then your side has permanent advantage, helping you kill it before the end of the round and activating the elemental again. If there are no targets in the elemental area then the spell is doing its job - you can stand in that area and suffer no melee threats. I know that if I were an average creature I would not willingly walk into the elemental area - even if it was currently occupied restraining another target I would know I'd be next at the start of my turn.
This spell will generally not be useful in a situation where the enemies can deal more ranged damage than the party, but in an ongoing melee situation or to protect ranged PCs from melee threat, there are features to this spell that no other similar level spell can match.
(I will admit this is not a good conjuration spell for a conjuration specialist wizard, as it benefits from practically none of the features of that subclass, so it also means the Adept feat which grants it is less useful for the subclass - but for a druid, another wizard or any other caster who takes the feat, it will be one of their most powerful conjuration spells)