Not sure why though? Those that wrote the feature made a choice as to what it applies too. The rules are full of such choices, sometimes they are due to balance and sometimes they are due to style and sometimes they just are.
On the feat Brutal grip, I feel like this doesn't make sense:
Versatile Dual Wielder. While wielding a Melee weapon with the Versatile property in one hand, the weapon has the Light property for you.
I would say this seems like an intended play style thing. This feat seems to be focused on allowing the fantasy of “ of big strong PC who can wield a two handed weapon with ease with one hand.” IE: barbarian duel wielding long swords, or great sword in on hand and shield in the other.
What I’m unsure about is whether you would use the one handed damage or gain the two handed damage level with versatile weapons, I assume one handed but it gets more powerful if you could use the versatile damage.
A rapier is already easily wielded with one hand. I understand you want to use the light property with the rapier, but honestly that is kind of a different power fantasy all together I think.
I would assume it is because the flavor text says you learn to use the weight of your weapons to your advantage. So a weapon that falls between light and heavy/versatile would not have the heft you are used to and therefore would function normaly.
Not sure why though? Those that wrote the feature made a choice as to what it applies too. The rules are full of such choices, sometimes they are due to balance and sometimes they are due to style and sometimes they just are.
and sometimes they are just oversights. Honestly, I'd Rule of Cool that one and allow it.
On the feat Brutal grip, I feel like this doesn't make sense:
Versatile Dual Wielder. While wielding a Melee weapon with the Versatile property in one hand, the weapon has the Light property for you.
That does seem like it would make sense, though it's more a question for the people who wrote it.
pronouns: he/she/they
Not sure why though? Those that wrote the feature made a choice as to what it applies too. The rules are full of such choices, sometimes they are due to balance and sometimes they are due to style and sometimes they just are.
I would say this seems like an intended play style thing. This feat seems to be focused on allowing the fantasy of “ of big strong PC who can wield a two handed weapon with ease with one hand.” IE: barbarian duel wielding long swords, or great sword in on hand and shield in the other.
What I’m unsure about is whether you would use the one handed damage or gain the two handed damage level with versatile weapons, I assume one handed but it gets more powerful if you could use the versatile damage.
A rapier is already easily wielded with one hand. I understand you want to use the light property with the rapier, but honestly that is kind of a different power fantasy all together I think.
I would assume it is because the flavor text says you learn to use the weight of your weapons to your advantage. So a weapon that falls between light and heavy/versatile would not have the heft you are used to and therefore would function normaly.
and sometimes they are just oversights. Honestly, I'd Rule of Cool that one and allow it.
I would say no. Dex fighters already have enough options.
"Sooner or later, your Players are going to smash your railroad into a sandbox."
-Vedexent
"real life is a super high CR."
-OboeLauren
"............anybody got any potatoes? We could drop a potato in each hole an' see which ones get viciously mauled by horrible monsters?"
-Ilyara Thundertale