Regarding Staff making official rulings vs the SAC

Quote from Davyd >>

Jeremy Crawford left WotC over a year ago, so this is a bizarrely moot point.

 His employment is irrelevant. This is a discussion that's open to anyone, if you don't think it's worth discussing you're free not To engage. For the other gentle person who asked about the source, it's from the D and D Youtube channel with that date

Quote from MPA >>

Quote from Davyd >>

Jeremy Crawford left WotC over a year ago, so this is a bizarrely moot point.

 His employment is irrelevant. This is a discussion that's open to anyone, if you don't think it's worth discussing you're free not To engage. For the other gentle person who asked about the source, it's from the D and D Youtube channel with that date

 But he's not staff so either his opinion on the rules is no longer final authority, or no one has the authority any more. His employment status is 100% relevent given by his own words he is discussing who on the staff can post rulings. As he's no longer staff, his commentary on authority is no longer relevant 

Quote from MPA >

 His employment is irrelevant. 

 

 Then my claim to be the definitive authority on D&D rulings is just as valid as his.

Quote from Agilemind >>

Quote from MPA >

 His employment is irrelevant. 

 

 Then my claim to be the definitive authority on D&D rulings is just as valid as his.

 No! I'm Spartacus Crawford!