So there are two Tasha battle master builds that include the feat Weapon master (Duelist and Gladiator). As you all know weapon master gives you one to dex or str and 4 martial weapon profs. As a battle master is already proficient with all martial weapons this feat is never a good idea. If those recommendations are intended to be serious they need to erratad to remove this trap recommendation as it will do nothing other then cause you to lose an attribute point.
Yeah, I have no idea what they were thinking when they made that feat (it should have just given proficiency in all simple and martial weapons anyway).
But yeah, it will never be a useful feat to a fighter regardless of build, so should be removed. Maybe they forgot how bad of a feat it was and included it on name alone?
So there are two Tasha battle master builds that include the feat Weapon master (Duelist and Gladiator). As you all know weapon master gives you one to dex or str and 4 martial weapon profs. As a battle master is already proficient with all martial weapons this feat is never a good idea. If those recommendations are intended to be serious they need to erratad to remove this trap recommendation as it will do nothing other then cause you to lose an attribute point.
Yeah, I have no idea what they were thinking when they made that feat (it should have just given proficiency in all simple and martial weapons anyway).
But yeah, it will never be a useful feat to a fighter regardless of build, so should be removed. Maybe they forgot how bad of a feat it was and included it on name alone?
Or worse - maybe they think it's good.
Mega Yahtzee Thread:
Highest 41: brocker2001 (#11,285).
Yahtzee of 2's: Emmber (#36,161).
Lowest 9: JoeltheWalrus (#312), Emmber (#12,505) and Dertinus (#20,953).
*shudders*
Whoever wrote it must not have read the feat. The other option bring they didn’t understand the feat? Which some how seems worse.