O sorrow, I have ended, you see, by respecting you, because I am certain you will never leave me.
Ah! I realize it: your beauty lies in the force of your being. You are like those who never left the sad fireside corner of my poor black heart.
O my sorrow, you are better than a well-beloved: because I know that on the day of my final agony, you will be there, lying in my sheets, O sorrow, so that you might once again attempt to enter my heart.
I once again have to say I disagree. Where is the proof to back this claim?
The fact that water is indeed wet. For starters, as a noun, wet can literally mean water (Source: Merriam-Webster) As an adjective, it means “consisting of, containing, covered with, or soaked with liquid (such as water)” As any water you can view or touch will most likely have more than one molecule, it is covered or soaked with liquid. And even if it was one singular molecule, it consists and contains water.
Therefore, water is wet
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
O sorrow, I have ended, you see, by respecting you, because I am certain you will never leave me.
Ah! I realize it: your beauty lies in the force of your being. You are like those who never left the sad fireside corner of my poor black heart.
O my sorrow, you are better than a well-beloved: because I know that on the day of my final agony, you will be there, lying in my sheets, O sorrow, so that you might once again attempt to enter my heart.
I once again have to say I disagree. Where is the proof to back this claim?
The fact that water is indeed wet. For starters, as a noun, wet can literally mean water (Source: Merriam-Webster) As an adjective, it means “consisting of, containing, covered with, or soaked with liquid (such as water)” As any water you can view or touch will most likely have more than one molecule, it is covered or soaked with liquid. And even if it was one singular molecule, it consists and contains water.
Therefore, water is wet
Because wet can mean water doesn’t mean that water is wet, as other liquids can cause wetness without being water or even containing water molecules. Dictionary descriptions of things aren’t always accurate regardless. As for that, if you places a layer of oil on top of a layer of water, you wouldn’t call the oil wet because the water is touching it. Water is more a collective of molecules in that context.
I once again have to say I disagree. Where is the proof to back this claim?
The fact that water is indeed wet. For starters, as a noun, wet can literally mean water (Source: Merriam-Webster) As an adjective, it means “consisting of, containing, covered with, or soaked with liquid (such as water)” As any water you can view or touch will most likely have more than one molecule, it is covered or soaked with liquid. And even if it was one singular molecule, it consists and contains water.
Therefore, water is wet
Because wet can mean water doesn’t mean that water is wet, as other liquids can cause wetness without being water or even containing water molecules. Dictionary descriptions of things aren’t always accurate regardless. As for that, if you places a layer of oil on top of a layer of water, you wouldn’t call the oil wet because the water is touching it. Water is more a collective of molecules in that context.
I once again have to say I disagree. Where is the proof to back this claim?
The fact that water is indeed wet. For starters, as a noun, wet can literally mean water (Source: Merriam-Webster) As an adjective, it means “consisting of, containing, covered with, or soaked with liquid (such as water)” As any water you can view or touch will most likely have more than one molecule, it is covered or soaked with liquid. And even if it was one singular molecule, it consists and contains water.
Therefore, water is wet
Because wet can mean water doesn’t mean that water is wet, as other liquids can cause wetness without being water or even containing water molecules. Dictionary descriptions of things aren’t always accurate regardless. As for that, if you places a layer of oil on top of a layer of water, you wouldn’t call the oil wet because the water is touching it. Water is more a collective of molecules in that context.
Therefore, water isn’t wet.
1. Yes, yes it does 2. This is the most used dictionary on the planet. While it cannot be perfectly accurate (as nothing truly can be) it is still a valid source. 3. name one. 4. Correct. I would call it wet because it’s oil, and oil is also wet. 5. Everything is a collection of molecules in every possible context, because molecules make up everything
Therefore, my point still stands, and water is wet
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
O sorrow, I have ended, you see, by respecting you, because I am certain you will never leave me.
Ah! I realize it: your beauty lies in the force of your being. You are like those who never left the sad fireside corner of my poor black heart.
O my sorrow, you are better than a well-beloved: because I know that on the day of my final agony, you will be there, lying in my sheets, O sorrow, so that you might once again attempt to enter my heart.
I once again have to say I disagree. Where is the proof to back this claim?
The fact that water is indeed wet. For starters, as a noun, wet can literally mean water (Source: Merriam-Webster) As an adjective, it means “consisting of, containing, covered with, or soaked with liquid (such as water)” As any water you can view or touch will most likely have more than one molecule, it is covered or soaked with liquid. And even if it was one singular molecule, it consists and contains water.
Therefore, water is wet
Because wet can mean water doesn’t mean that water is wet, as other liquids can cause wetness without being water or even containing water molecules. Dictionary descriptions of things aren’t always accurate regardless. As for that, if you places a layer of oil on top of a layer of water, you wouldn’t call the oil wet because the water is touching it. Water is more a collective of molecules in that context.
Therefore, water isn’t wet.
1. Yes, yes it does 2. This is the most used dictionary on the planet. While it cannot be perfectly accurate (as nothing truly can be) it is still a valid source. 3. name one. 4. Correct. I would call it wet because it’s oil, and oil is also wet. 5. Everything is a collection of molecules in every possible context, because molecules make up everything
Therefore, my point still stands, and water is wet
I once again have to say I disagree. Where is the proof to back this claim?
The fact that water is indeed wet. For starters, as a noun, wet can literally mean water (Source: Merriam-Webster) As an adjective, it means “consisting of, containing, covered with, or soaked with liquid (such as water)” As any water you can view or touch will most likely have more than one molecule, it is covered or soaked with liquid. And even if it was one singular molecule, it consists and contains water.
Therefore, water is wet
Because wet can mean water doesn’t mean that water is wet, as other liquids can cause wetness without being water or even containing water molecules. Dictionary descriptions of things aren’t always accurate regardless. As for that, if you places a layer of oil on top of a layer of water, you wouldn’t call the oil wet because the water is touching it. Water is more a collective of molecules in that context.
Therefore, water isn’t wet.
1. Yes, yes it does 2. This is the most used dictionary on the planet. While it cannot be perfectly accurate (as nothing truly can be) it is still a valid source. 3. name one. 4. Correct. I would call it wet because it’s oil, and oil is also wet. 5. Everything is a collection of molecules in every possible context, because molecules make up everything
Therefore, my point still stands, and water is wet
I concede, I’m not going to put in the brain power to try and bs a way into winning this argument. Hats off Himy.
I once again have to say I disagree. Where is the proof to back this claim?
The fact that water is indeed wet. For starters, as a noun, wet can literally mean water (Source: Merriam-Webster) As an adjective, it means “consisting of, containing, covered with, or soaked with liquid (such as water)” As any water you can view or touch will most likely have more than one molecule, it is covered or soaked with liquid. And even if it was one singular molecule, it consists and contains water.
Therefore, water is wet
Because wet can mean water doesn’t mean that water is wet, as other liquids can cause wetness without being water or even containing water molecules. Dictionary descriptions of things aren’t always accurate regardless. As for that, if you places a layer of oil on top of a layer of water, you wouldn’t call the oil wet because the water is touching it. Water is more a collective of molecules in that context.
Therefore, water isn’t wet.
1. Yes, yes it does 2. This is the most used dictionary on the planet. While it cannot be perfectly accurate (as nothing truly can be) it is still a valid source. 3. name one. 4. Correct. I would call it wet because it’s oil, and oil is also wet. 5. Everything is a collection of molecules in every possible context, because molecules make up everything
Therefore, my point still stands, and water is wet
So I'm covered in flesh?
Metaphysically, depends on your definition of you scientifically, yes, your brain is covered in flesh.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
O sorrow, I have ended, you see, by respecting you, because I am certain you will never leave me.
Ah! I realize it: your beauty lies in the force of your being. You are like those who never left the sad fireside corner of my poor black heart.
O my sorrow, you are better than a well-beloved: because I know that on the day of my final agony, you will be there, lying in my sheets, O sorrow, so that you might once again attempt to enter my heart.
I once again have to say I disagree. Where is the proof to back this claim?
The fact that water is indeed wet. For starters, as a noun, wet can literally mean water (Source: Merriam-Webster) As an adjective, it means “consisting of, containing, covered with, or soaked with liquid (such as water)” As any water you can view or touch will most likely have more than one molecule, it is covered or soaked with liquid. And even if it was one singular molecule, it consists and contains water.
Therefore, water is wet
Because wet can mean water doesn’t mean that water is wet, as other liquids can cause wetness without being water or even containing water molecules. Dictionary descriptions of things aren’t always accurate regardless. As for that, if you places a layer of oil on top of a layer of water, you wouldn’t call the oil wet because the water is touching it. Water is more a collective of molecules in that context.
Therefore, water isn’t wet.
1. Yes, yes it does 2. This is the most used dictionary on the planet. While it cannot be perfectly accurate (as nothing truly can be) it is still a valid source. 3. name one. 4. Correct. I would call it wet because it’s oil, and oil is also wet. 5. Everything is a collection of molecules in every possible context, because molecules make up everything
Therefore, my point still stands, and water is wet
So I'm covered in flesh?
Metaphysically, depends on your definition of you scientifically, yes, your brain is covered in flesh.
Fair point. Fine, my brain is covered in brain????
I once again have to say I disagree. Where is the proof to back this claim?
The fact that water is indeed wet. For starters, as a noun, wet can literally mean water (Source: Merriam-Webster) As an adjective, it means “consisting of, containing, covered with, or soaked with liquid (such as water)” As any water you can view or touch will most likely have more than one molecule, it is covered or soaked with liquid. And even if it was one singular molecule, it consists and contains water.
Therefore, water is wet
Because wet can mean water doesn’t mean that water is wet, as other liquids can cause wetness without being water or even containing water molecules. Dictionary descriptions of things aren’t always accurate regardless. As for that, if you places a layer of oil on top of a layer of water, you wouldn’t call the oil wet because the water is touching it. Water is more a collective of molecules in that context.
Therefore, water isn’t wet.
1. Yes, yes it does 2. This is the most used dictionary on the planet. While it cannot be perfectly accurate (as nothing truly can be) it is still a valid source. 3. name one. 4. Correct. I would call it wet because it’s oil, and oil is also wet. 5. Everything is a collection of molecules in every possible context, because molecules make up everything
Therefore, my point still stands, and water is wet
So I'm covered in flesh?
Metaphysically, depends on your definition of you scientifically, yes, your brain is covered in flesh.
Fair point. Fine, my brain is covered in brain????
Correct. Parts of your brain are covered by other parts of your brain, but not completely. Your brain is wet though
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
O sorrow, I have ended, you see, by respecting you, because I am certain you will never leave me.
Ah! I realize it: your beauty lies in the force of your being. You are like those who never left the sad fireside corner of my poor black heart.
O my sorrow, you are better than a well-beloved: because I know that on the day of my final agony, you will be there, lying in my sheets, O sorrow, so that you might once again attempt to enter my heart.
I once again have to say I disagree. Where is the proof to back this claim?
The fact that water is indeed wet. For starters, as a noun, wet can literally mean water (Source: Merriam-Webster) As an adjective, it means “consisting of, containing, covered with, or soaked with liquid (such as water)” As any water you can view or touch will most likely have more than one molecule, it is covered or soaked with liquid. And even if it was one singular molecule, it consists and contains water.
Therefore, water is wet
Because wet can mean water doesn’t mean that water is wet, as other liquids can cause wetness without being water or even containing water molecules. Dictionary descriptions of things aren’t always accurate regardless. As for that, if you places a layer of oil on top of a layer of water, you wouldn’t call the oil wet because the water is touching it. Water is more a collective of molecules in that context.
Therefore, water isn’t wet.
1. Yes, yes it does 2. This is the most used dictionary on the planet. While it cannot be perfectly accurate (as nothing truly can be) it is still a valid source. 3. name one. 4. Correct. I would call it wet because it’s oil, and oil is also wet. 5. Everything is a collection of molecules in every possible context, because molecules make up everything
Therefore, my point still stands, and water is wet
So I'm covered in flesh?
Metaphysically, depends on your definition of you scientifically, yes, your brain is covered in flesh.
Fair point. Fine, my brain is covered in brain????
Correct. Parts of your brain are covered by other parts of your brain, but not completely. Your brain is wet though
Water is wet. If I remember correctly, you said mud is muddy, which means mud is also dirty. If mud is dirty, then dirt is also dirty. And if mud can be dirty and mud can be muddy, why can’t water be wet?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
O sorrow, I have ended, you see, by respecting you, because I am certain you will never leave me.
Ah! I realize it: your beauty lies in the force of your being. You are like those who never left the sad fireside corner of my poor black heart.
O my sorrow, you are better than a well-beloved: because I know that on the day of my final agony, you will be there, lying in my sheets, O sorrow, so that you might once again attempt to enter my heart.
Water is wet. If I remember correctly, you said mud is muddy, which means mud is also dirty. If mud is dirty, then dirt is also dirty. And if mud can be dirty and mud can be muddy, why can’t water be wet?
Well, when mud dries into a solid it is still mud, (as it is a non newtonian fluid, and so it dries (Not part of my point just explaining drying)). Water is a liquid, and it freezes (not part of my point) And it turns into ice (Part of my point) Mud stays mud so it can have wet mud on it and be muddy mud
Water is wet. If I remember correctly, you said mud is muddy, which means mud is also dirty. If mud is dirty, then dirt is also dirty. And if mud can be dirty and mud can be muddy, why can’t water be wet?
Well, when mud dries into a solid it is still mud, (as it is a non newtonian fluid, and so it dries (Not part of my point just explaining drying)). Water is a liquid, and it freezes (not part of my point) And it turns into ice (Part of my point) Mud stays mud so it can have wet mud on it and be muddy mud
Water does not stay water
Ice is still water. It’s just a fancy word for solid water. Ice, chemically, is just H20 in a solid state. Also, dried mud is called dirt and mud is not a non Newtonian fluid
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
O sorrow, I have ended, you see, by respecting you, because I am certain you will never leave me.
Ah! I realize it: your beauty lies in the force of your being. You are like those who never left the sad fireside corner of my poor black heart.
O my sorrow, you are better than a well-beloved: because I know that on the day of my final agony, you will be there, lying in my sheets, O sorrow, so that you might once again attempt to enter my heart.
Water is wet. If I remember correctly, you said mud is muddy, which means mud is also dirty. If mud is dirty, then dirt is also dirty. And if mud can be dirty and mud can be muddy, why can’t water be wet?
Well, when mud dries into a solid it is still mud, (as it is a non newtonian fluid, and so it dries (Not part of my point just explaining drying)). Water is a liquid, and it freezes (not part of my point) And it turns into ice (Part of my point) Mud stays mud so it can have wet mud on it and be muddy mud
Water does not stay water
Ice is still water. It’s just a fancy word for solid water. Ice, chemically, is just H20 in a solid state. Also, dried mud is called dirt and mud is not a non Newtonian fluid
Just butting in to say that non Newtonian fluids are weird, after all, Ketchup is among the few non Newtonian fluids.
*Thrusts my hand up through the ground and pulls my head, shoulders, and upper chest through the resulting hole* Halito, ʋm i̱kana!
("ʋm i̱kana" is the singular and plural form of friend, with "ʋm" meaning my. Just for those who don't know.)
*Looks at the argument that has unfolded before me* Should I come back?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Hi there! My name's Elk. I'm NoiSilverheart's doppelgänger. I'm a demi/grayromantic, socially awkward Okie who may or may not be a pyromaniac. *random confetti blast*
I'm a warlock of the Archcrone, and my patron is TheFriendlyArchfey. I was nicknamed AchatesCervus8337 by VitusW and given the titles "Swashbuckling Scorcher", "The Unpredictable Jedi", "Burning Fury of the Ancients", and "Combustion Knight" by DrummerBoyDragonSlayer.
You are scientifically incorrect
O sorrow, I have ended, you see, by respecting you, because I am certain you will never leave me.
Ah! I realize it: your beauty lies in the force of your being. You are like those who never left the sad fireside corner of my poor black heart.
O my sorrow, you are better than a well-beloved: because I know that on the day of my final agony, you will be there, lying in my sheets, O sorrow, so that you might once again attempt to enter my heart.
-Excerpt, Prayer for loving sorrow
I once again have to say I disagree. Where is the proof to back this claim?
The fact that water is indeed wet. For starters, as a noun, wet can literally mean water (Source: Merriam-Webster) As an adjective, it means “consisting of, containing, covered with, or soaked with liquid (such as water)” As any water you can view or touch will most likely have more than one molecule, it is covered or soaked with liquid. And even if it was one singular molecule, it consists and contains water.
Therefore, water is wet
O sorrow, I have ended, you see, by respecting you, because I am certain you will never leave me.
Ah! I realize it: your beauty lies in the force of your being. You are like those who never left the sad fireside corner of my poor black heart.
O my sorrow, you are better than a well-beloved: because I know that on the day of my final agony, you will be there, lying in my sheets, O sorrow, so that you might once again attempt to enter my heart.
-Excerpt, Prayer for loving sorrow
Because wet can mean water doesn’t mean that water is wet, as other liquids can cause wetness without being water or even containing water molecules. Dictionary descriptions of things aren’t always accurate regardless. As for that, if you places a layer of oil on top of a layer of water, you wouldn’t call the oil wet because the water is touching it. Water is more a collective of molecules in that context.
Therefore, water isn’t wet.
Jester is correct in this one
Though mud is muddy on the other hand
Sig but long ^w^
Gulpmissle Day, Saturday, Feburay 15th, 2025
'Naner Day, Tuesday, March 3rd, 2026
💛🤍💜🖤 🩷💛💙
Salem has dubbed me Fellow Pancake of The Fox.
Henlo, I am a pan, NB, chaotic ADHD mess of a furry.
I am also a eepy eeper, who likes WoF, WC, and fire.
1. Yes, yes it does 2. This is the most used dictionary on the planet. While it cannot be perfectly accurate (as nothing truly can be) it is still a valid source. 3. name one. 4. Correct. I would call it wet because it’s oil, and oil is also wet. 5. Everything is a collection of molecules in every possible context, because molecules make up everything
Therefore, my point still stands, and water is wet
O sorrow, I have ended, you see, by respecting you, because I am certain you will never leave me.
Ah! I realize it: your beauty lies in the force of your being. You are like those who never left the sad fireside corner of my poor black heart.
O my sorrow, you are better than a well-beloved: because I know that on the day of my final agony, you will be there, lying in my sheets, O sorrow, so that you might once again attempt to enter my heart.
-Excerpt, Prayer for loving sorrow
So I'm covered in flesh?
Sig but long ^w^
Gulpmissle Day, Saturday, Feburay 15th, 2025
'Naner Day, Tuesday, March 3rd, 2026
💛🤍💜🖤 🩷💛💙
Salem has dubbed me Fellow Pancake of The Fox.
Henlo, I am a pan, NB, chaotic ADHD mess of a furry.
I am also a eepy eeper, who likes WoF, WC, and fire.
I concede, I’m not going to put in the brain power to try and bs a way into winning this argument. Hats off Himy.
Metaphysically, depends on your definition of you scientifically, yes, your brain is covered in flesh.
O sorrow, I have ended, you see, by respecting you, because I am certain you will never leave me.
Ah! I realize it: your beauty lies in the force of your being. You are like those who never left the sad fireside corner of my poor black heart.
O my sorrow, you are better than a well-beloved: because I know that on the day of my final agony, you will be there, lying in my sheets, O sorrow, so that you might once again attempt to enter my heart.
-Excerpt, Prayer for loving sorrow
Fair point. Fine, my brain is covered in brain????
Sig but long ^w^
Gulpmissle Day, Saturday, Feburay 15th, 2025
'Naner Day, Tuesday, March 3rd, 2026
💛🤍💜🖤 🩷💛💙
Salem has dubbed me Fellow Pancake of The Fox.
Henlo, I am a pan, NB, chaotic ADHD mess of a furry.
I am also a eepy eeper, who likes WoF, WC, and fire.
Correct. Parts of your brain are covered by other parts of your brain, but not completely. Your brain is wet though
O sorrow, I have ended, you see, by respecting you, because I am certain you will never leave me.
Ah! I realize it: your beauty lies in the force of your being. You are like those who never left the sad fireside corner of my poor black heart.
O my sorrow, you are better than a well-beloved: because I know that on the day of my final agony, you will be there, lying in my sheets, O sorrow, so that you might once again attempt to enter my heart.
-Excerpt, Prayer for loving sorrow
My brain is wet, but water ain't
Sig but long ^w^
Gulpmissle Day, Saturday, Feburay 15th, 2025
'Naner Day, Tuesday, March 3rd, 2026
💛🤍💜🖤 🩷💛💙
Salem has dubbed me Fellow Pancake of The Fox.
Henlo, I am a pan, NB, chaotic ADHD mess of a furry.
I am also a eepy eeper, who likes WoF, WC, and fire.
Water is wet. If I remember correctly, you said mud is muddy, which means mud is also dirty. If mud is dirty, then dirt is also dirty. And if mud can be dirty and mud can be muddy, why can’t water be wet?
O sorrow, I have ended, you see, by respecting you, because I am certain you will never leave me.
Ah! I realize it: your beauty lies in the force of your being. You are like those who never left the sad fireside corner of my poor black heart.
O my sorrow, you are better than a well-beloved: because I know that on the day of my final agony, you will be there, lying in my sheets, O sorrow, so that you might once again attempt to enter my heart.
-Excerpt, Prayer for loving sorrow
https://www.reddit.com/r/engrish/comments/e94av9/do_not_the_cat/?rdt=35104
Sig but long ^w^
Gulpmissle Day, Saturday, Feburay 15th, 2025
'Naner Day, Tuesday, March 3rd, 2026
💛🤍💜🖤 🩷💛💙
Salem has dubbed me Fellow Pancake of The Fox.
Henlo, I am a pan, NB, chaotic ADHD mess of a furry.
I am also a eepy eeper, who likes WoF, WC, and fire.
Well, when mud dries into a solid it is still mud, (as it is a non newtonian fluid, and so it dries (Not part of my point just explaining drying)). Water is a liquid, and it freezes (not part of my point) And it turns into ice (Part of my point)
Mud stays mud so it can have wet mud on it and be muddy mud
Water does not stay water
Sig but long ^w^
Gulpmissle Day, Saturday, Feburay 15th, 2025
'Naner Day, Tuesday, March 3rd, 2026
💛🤍💜🖤 🩷💛💙
Salem has dubbed me Fellow Pancake of The Fox.
Henlo, I am a pan, NB, chaotic ADHD mess of a furry.
I am also a eepy eeper, who likes WoF, WC, and fire.
Ice is still water. It’s just a fancy word for solid water. Ice, chemically, is just H20 in a solid state. Also, dried mud is called dirt and mud is not a non Newtonian fluid
O sorrow, I have ended, you see, by respecting you, because I am certain you will never leave me.
Ah! I realize it: your beauty lies in the force of your being. You are like those who never left the sad fireside corner of my poor black heart.
O my sorrow, you are better than a well-beloved: because I know that on the day of my final agony, you will be there, lying in my sheets, O sorrow, so that you might once again attempt to enter my heart.
-Excerpt, Prayer for loving sorrow
Just butting in to say that non Newtonian fluids are weird, after all, Ketchup is among the few non Newtonian fluids.
If I may add to this discussion, Urban dictionary defines wet as, and I quote, the opposite of dry.
Hi, I’m DrakenBrine, here’s my Sig and characters
I am The Grand Envisioner!
*Looks at the argument that has unfolded before me* Should I come back?
Hi there! My name's Elk. I'm NoiSilverheart's doppelgänger. I'm a demi/grayromantic, socially awkward Okie who may or may not be a pyromaniac. *random confetti blast*
I'm a warlock of the Archcrone, and my patron is TheFriendlyArchfey. I was nicknamed AchatesCervus8337 by VitusW and given the titles "Swashbuckling Scorcher", "The Unpredictable Jedi", "Burning Fury of the Ancients", and "Combustion Knight" by DrummerBoyDragonSlayer.
Extended sig
Well I mean, the Urban Dictionary isn’t the greatest, but they definitely got that one right. Mostly.