MDGA

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Note: Extremely blunt post

I think that the new(er) people need to rp with less silly ways. Because partially why I've stopped rping is because I can't have the deep conversations in rping that I like. That was basically the entire reason I rped in the first place.

They’re allowed to RP however they want, but I agree—I think that if we want to do goofy RPs, they should be in different threads than the more serious ones.

 I agree.

 on the job of making a silly rp thread

 I don't think that is needed. Considering basically all of the current rp threads are silly rp threads. It's the non-silly ones that we don't have.

 ok, then I'll do that! I want to help, I just don't know what to do.

 Wait. We shall discuss. Discuss before actions.

And deep rp threads have to be thought out. Think of any of Baalze's rp threads. That is what the in-depth lore I'm asking for.

Yep!

Adam: the whole point is to suggest things, not just do them (at least right now). We can’t just jump into action because that’s what we’ve been doing whenever people talk about changing the forums, and look how it’s gone.

What suggestions do you have?

And: why should being relatively ‘new’ to DDB be something that obstructs you from loving it?

 ok, sorry. it was mostly tana's comment about new people not wanting silly rp. but something I have noticed is people are actually not just not silly, just different silly.

 Can you rephrase that? Because all of the not's have confused me.

 Ditto.

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Note: Extremely blunt post

I think that the new(er) people need to rp with less silly ways. Because partially why I've stopped rping is because I can't have the deep conversations in rping that I like. That was basically the entire reason I rped in the first place.

They’re allowed to RP however they want, but I agree—I think that if we want to do goofy RPs, they should be in different threads than the more serious ones.

 I agree.

 on the job of making a silly rp thread

 I don't think that is needed. Considering basically all of the current rp threads are silly rp threads. It's the non-silly ones that we don't have.

 ok, then I'll do that! I want to help, I just don't know what to do.

 Wait. We shall discuss. Discuss before actions.

And deep rp threads have to be thought out. Think of any of Baalze's rp threads. That is what the in-depth lore I'm asking for.

Yep!

Adam: the whole point is to suggest things, not just do them (at least right now). We can’t just jump into action because that’s what we’ve been doing whenever people talk about changing the forums, and look how it’s gone.

What suggestions do you have?

And: why should being relatively ‘new’ to DDB be something that obstructs you from loving it?

 I tried making deep-ish rp threads. Should I make a storybook rp thread?

Storybook?

 Yeah, like literature. Like, you can have characters from any world of literature. It’s meant to be both deep and whimsical.

 hm, sounds nice. that said, people get embarrased somtimes sharing what they like. in fact, that might be the critical problem we are trying to solve. we need to help people feel more comfortable, but I don't know how.

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Note: Extremely blunt post

I think that the new(er) people need to rp with less silly ways. Because partially why I've stopped rping is because I can't have the deep conversations in rping that I like. That was basically the entire reason I rped in the first place.

They’re allowed to RP however they want, but I agree—I think that if we want to do goofy RPs, they should be in different threads than the more serious ones.

 I agree.

 on the job of making a silly rp thread

 I don't think that is needed. Considering basically all of the current rp threads are silly rp threads. It's the non-silly ones that we don't have.

 ok, then I'll do that! I want to help, I just don't know what to do.

 Wait. We shall discuss. Discuss before actions.

And deep rp threads have to be thought out. Think of any of Baalze's rp threads. That is what the in-depth lore I'm asking for.

Yep!

Adam: the whole point is to suggest things, not just do them (at least right now). We can’t just jump into action because that’s what we’ve been doing whenever people talk about changing the forums, and look how it’s gone.

What suggestions do you have?

And: why should being relatively ‘new’ to DDB be something that obstructs you from loving it?

 ok, sorry. it was mostly tana's comment about new people not wanting silly rp. but something I have noticed is people are actually not just not silly, just different silly.

 Can you rephrase that? Because all of the not's have confused me.

 Ditto.

 I think I said what I meant to say above.

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Note: Extremely blunt post

I think that the new(er) people need to rp with less silly ways. Because partially why I've stopped rping is because I can't have the deep conversations in rping that I like. That was basically the entire reason I rped in the first place.

They’re allowed to RP however they want, but I agree—I think that if we want to do goofy RPs, they should be in different threads than the more serious ones.

 I agree.

 on the job of making a silly rp thread

 I don't think that is needed. Considering basically all of the current rp threads are silly rp threads. It's the non-silly ones that we don't have.

 ok, then I'll do that! I want to help, I just don't know what to do.

 Wait. We shall discuss. Discuss before actions.

And deep rp threads have to be thought out. Think of any of Baalze's rp threads. That is what the in-depth lore I'm asking for.

Yep!

Adam: the whole point is to suggest things, not just do them (at least right now). We can’t just jump into action because that’s what we’ve been doing whenever people talk about changing the forums, and look how it’s gone.

What suggestions do you have?

And: why should being relatively ‘new’ to DDB be something that obstructs you from loving it?

 I tried making deep-ish rp threads. Should I make a storybook rp thread?

Storybook?

 Yeah, like literature. Like, you can have characters from any world of literature. It’s meant to be both deep and whimsical.

 hm, sounds nice. that said, people get embarrased somtimes sharing what they like. in fact, that might be the critical problem we are trying to solve. we need to help people feel more comfortable, but I don't know how.

 Yeah.

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Note: Extremely blunt post

I think that the new(er) people need to rp with less silly ways. Because partially why I've stopped rping is because I can't have the deep conversations in rping that I like. That was basically the entire reason I rped in the first place.

They’re allowed to RP however they want, but I agree—I think that if we want to do goofy RPs, they should be in different threads than the more serious ones.

 I agree.

 on the job of making a silly rp thread

 I don't think that is needed. Considering basically all of the current rp threads are silly rp threads. It's the non-silly ones that we don't have.

 ok, then I'll do that! I want to help, I just don't know what to do.

 Wait. We shall discuss. Discuss before actions.

And deep rp threads have to be thought out. Think of any of Baalze's rp threads. That is what the in-depth lore I'm asking for.

Yep!

Adam: the whole point is to suggest things, not just do them (at least right now). We can’t just jump into action because that’s what we’ve been doing whenever people talk about changing the forums, and look how it’s gone.

What suggestions do you have?

And: why should being relatively ‘new’ to DDB be something that obstructs you from loving it?

 ok, sorry. it was mostly tana's comment about new people not wanting silly rp. but something I have noticed is people are actually not just not silly, just different silly.

 Can you rephrase that? Because all of the not's have confused me.

 Ditto.

 I think I said what I meant to say above.

 Not exactly what I meant. I'm not saying that you didn't say what you mean. I'm saying that I'm confused about what you were saying, as in I can't understand it because there is too many nots

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Note: Extremely blunt post

I think that the new(er) people need to rp with less silly ways. Because partially why I've stopped rping is because I can't have the deep conversations in rping that I like. That was basically the entire reason I rped in the first place.

They’re allowed to RP however they want, but I agree—I think that if we want to do goofy RPs, they should be in different threads than the more serious ones.

 I agree.

 on the job of making a silly rp thread

 I don't think that is needed. Considering basically all of the current rp threads are silly rp threads. It's the non-silly ones that we don't have.

 ok, then I'll do that! I want to help, I just don't know what to do.

 Wait. We shall discuss. Discuss before actions.

And deep rp threads have to be thought out. Think of any of Baalze's rp threads. That is what the in-depth lore I'm asking for.

Yep!

Adam: the whole point is to suggest things, not just do them (at least right now). We can’t just jump into action because that’s what we’ve been doing whenever people talk about changing the forums, and look how it’s gone.

What suggestions do you have?

And: why should being relatively ‘new’ to DDB be something that obstructs you from loving it?

 ok, sorry. it was mostly tana's comment about new people not wanting silly rp. but something I have noticed is people are actually not just not silly, just different silly.

 Can you rephrase that? Because all of the not's have confused me.

Firstly: Adam, you don't have to be sorry for liking DDB.

And yeah, what do you mean with the second part of that? 

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Note: Extremely blunt post

I think that the new(er) people need to rp with less silly ways. Because partially why I've stopped rping is because I can't have the deep conversations in rping that I like. That was basically the entire reason I rped in the first place.

They’re allowed to RP however they want, but I agree—I think that if we want to do goofy RPs, they should be in different threads than the more serious ones.

 I agree.

 on the job of making a silly rp thread

 I don't think that is needed. Considering basically all of the current rp threads are silly rp threads. It's the non-silly ones that we don't have.

 ok, then I'll do that! I want to help, I just don't know what to do.

 Wait. We shall discuss. Discuss before actions.

And deep rp threads have to be thought out. Think of any of Baalze's rp threads. That is what the in-depth lore I'm asking for.

Yep!

Adam: the whole point is to suggest things, not just do them (at least right now). We can’t just jump into action because that’s what we’ve been doing whenever people talk about changing the forums, and look how it’s gone.

What suggestions do you have?

And: why should being relatively ‘new’ to DDB be something that obstructs you from loving it?

 ok, sorry. it was mostly tana's comment about new people not wanting silly rp. but something I have noticed is people are actually not just not silly, just different silly.

 Can you rephrase that? Because all of the not's have confused me.

 Ditto.

 I think I said what I meant to say above.

 Not exactly what I meant. I'm not saying that you didn't say what you mean. I'm saying that I'm confused about what you were saying, as in I can't understand it because there is too many nots

 No, I knew what you meant.

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Note: Extremely blunt post

I think that the new(er) people need to rp with less silly ways. Because partially why I've stopped rping is because I can't have the deep conversations in rping that I like. That was basically the entire reason I rped in the first place.

They’re allowed to RP however they want, but I agree—I think that if we want to do goofy RPs, they should be in different threads than the more serious ones.

 I agree.

 on the job of making a silly rp thread

 I don't think that is needed. Considering basically all of the current rp threads are silly rp threads. It's the non-silly ones that we don't have.

 ok, then I'll do that! I want to help, I just don't know what to do.

 Wait. We shall discuss. Discuss before actions.

And deep rp threads have to be thought out. Think of any of Baalze's rp threads. That is what the in-depth lore I'm asking for.

Yep!

Adam: the whole point is to suggest things, not just do them (at least right now). We can’t just jump into action because that’s what we’ve been doing whenever people talk about changing the forums, and look how it’s gone.

What suggestions do you have?

And: why should being relatively ‘new’ to DDB be something that obstructs you from loving it?

 ok, sorry. it was mostly tana's comment about new people not wanting silly rp. but something I have noticed is people are actually not just not silly, just different silly.

 Can you rephrase that? Because all of the not's have confused me.

 Ditto.

 I think I said what I meant to say above.

 Not exactly what I meant. I'm not saying that you didn't say what you mean. I'm saying that I'm confused about what you were saying, as in I can't understand it because there is too many nots

 No, I knew what you meant.

I think Tana's talking to Adam 

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Note: Extremely blunt post

I think that the new(er) people need to rp with less silly ways. Because partially why I've stopped rping is because I can't have the deep conversations in rping that I like. That was basically the entire reason I rped in the first place.

They’re allowed to RP however they want, but I agree—I think that if we want to do goofy RPs, they should be in different threads than the more serious ones.

 I agree.

 on the job of making a silly rp thread

 I don't think that is needed. Considering basically all of the current rp threads are silly rp threads. It's the non-silly ones that we don't have.

 ok, then I'll do that! I want to help, I just don't know what to do.

 Wait. We shall discuss. Discuss before actions.

And deep rp threads have to be thought out. Think of any of Baalze's rp threads. That is what the in-depth lore I'm asking for.

Yep!

Adam: the whole point is to suggest things, not just do them (at least right now). We can’t just jump into action because that’s what we’ve been doing whenever people talk about changing the forums, and look how it’s gone.

What suggestions do you have?

And: why should being relatively ‘new’ to DDB be something that obstructs you from loving it?

 ok, sorry. it was mostly tana's comment about new people not wanting silly rp. but something I have noticed is people are actually not just not silly, just different silly.

 Can you rephrase that? Because all of the not's have confused me.

 Ditto.

 I think I said what I meant to say above.

 Not exactly what I meant. I'm not saying that you didn't say what you mean. I'm saying that I'm confused about what you were saying, as in I can't understand it because there is too many nots

 No, I knew what you meant.

I think Tana's talking to Adam 

 Oh. Am confused now.

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Note: Extremely blunt post

I think that the new(er) people need to rp with less silly ways. Because partially why I've stopped rping is because I can't have the deep conversations in rping that I like. That was basically the entire reason I rped in the first place.

They’re allowed to RP however they want, but I agree—I think that if we want to do goofy RPs, they should be in different threads than the more serious ones.

 I agree.

 on the job of making a silly rp thread

 I don't think that is needed. Considering basically all of the current rp threads are silly rp threads. It's the non-silly ones that we don't have.

 ok, then I'll do that! I want to help, I just don't know what to do.

 Wait. We shall discuss. Discuss before actions.

And deep rp threads have to be thought out. Think of any of Baalze's rp threads. That is what the in-depth lore I'm asking for.

Yep!

Adam: the whole point is to suggest things, not just do them (at least right now). We can’t just jump into action because that’s what we’ve been doing whenever people talk about changing the forums, and look how it’s gone.

What suggestions do you have?

And: why should being relatively ‘new’ to DDB be something that obstructs you from loving it?

 ok, sorry. it was mostly tana's comment about new people not wanting silly rp. but something I have noticed is people are actually not just not silly, just different silly.

 Can you rephrase that? Because all of the not's have confused me.

Firstly: Adam, you don't have to be sorry for liking DDB.

And yeah, what do you mean with the second part of that? 

 I wasn't sorry about liking ddb, about trying to rush into action. and I tried to say everyones still silly, just different silly.

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Note: Extremely blunt post

I think that the new(er) people need to rp with less silly ways. Because partially why I've stopped rping is because I can't have the deep conversations in rping that I like. That was basically the entire reason I rped in the first place.

They’re allowed to RP however they want, but I agree—I think that if we want to do goofy RPs, they should be in different threads than the more serious ones.

 I agree.

 on the job of making a silly rp thread

 I don't think that is needed. Considering basically all of the current rp threads are silly rp threads. It's the non-silly ones that we don't have.

 ok, then I'll do that! I want to help, I just don't know what to do.

 Wait. We shall discuss. Discuss before actions.

And deep rp threads have to be thought out. Think of any of Baalze's rp threads. That is what the in-depth lore I'm asking for.

Yep!

Adam: the whole point is to suggest things, not just do them (at least right now). We can’t just jump into action because that’s what we’ve been doing whenever people talk about changing the forums, and look how it’s gone.

What suggestions do you have?

And: why should being relatively ‘new’ to DDB be something that obstructs you from loving it?

 ok, sorry. it was mostly tana's comment about new people not wanting silly rp. but something I have noticed is people are actually not just not silly, just different silly.

 Can you rephrase that? Because all of the not's have confused me.

 Ditto.

 I think I said what I meant to say above.

 Not exactly what I meant. I'm not saying that you didn't say what you mean. I'm saying that I'm confused about what you were saying, as in I can't understand it because there is too many nots

 No, I knew what you meant.

I think Tana's talking to Adam 

 Oh. Am confused now.

You said ditto, but Adam replied to all of y'all with 'I think I said what I meant to say'. 

Tana was talking to Adam responding with that. 

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Note: Extremely blunt post

I think that the new(er) people need to rp with less silly ways. Because partially why I've stopped rping is because I can't have the deep conversations in rping that I like. That was basically the entire reason I rped in the first place.

They’re allowed to RP however they want, but I agree—I think that if we want to do goofy RPs, they should be in different threads than the more serious ones.

 I agree.

 on the job of making a silly rp thread

 I don't think that is needed. Considering basically all of the current rp threads are silly rp threads. It's the non-silly ones that we don't have.

 ok, then I'll do that! I want to help, I just don't know what to do.

 Wait. We shall discuss. Discuss before actions.

And deep rp threads have to be thought out. Think of any of Baalze's rp threads. That is what the in-depth lore I'm asking for.

Yep!

Adam: the whole point is to suggest things, not just do them (at least right now). We can’t just jump into action because that’s what we’ve been doing whenever people talk about changing the forums, and look how it’s gone.

What suggestions do you have?

And: why should being relatively ‘new’ to DDB be something that obstructs you from loving it?

 ok, sorry. it was mostly tana's comment about new people not wanting silly rp. but something I have noticed is people are actually not just not silly, just different silly.

 Can you rephrase that? Because all of the not's have confused me.

Firstly: Adam, you don't have to be sorry for liking DDB.

And yeah, what do you mean with the second part of that? 

 I wasn't sorry about liking ddb, about trying to rush into action. and I tried to say everyones still silly, just different silly.

 Ok fair. I’m still a whimsical silly, but yeah, a bit different.

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Note: Extremely blunt post

I think that the new(er) people need to rp with less silly ways. Because partially why I've stopped rping is because I can't have the deep conversations in rping that I like. That was basically the entire reason I rped in the first place.

They’re allowed to RP however they want, but I agree—I think that if we want to do goofy RPs, they should be in different threads than the more serious ones.

 I agree.

 on the job of making a silly rp thread

 I don't think that is needed. Considering basically all of the current rp threads are silly rp threads. It's the non-silly ones that we don't have.

 ok, then I'll do that! I want to help, I just don't know what to do.

 Wait. We shall discuss. Discuss before actions.

And deep rp threads have to be thought out. Think of any of Baalze's rp threads. That is what the in-depth lore I'm asking for.

Yep!

Adam: the whole point is to suggest things, not just do them (at least right now). We can’t just jump into action because that’s what we’ve been doing whenever people talk about changing the forums, and look how it’s gone.

What suggestions do you have?

And: why should being relatively ‘new’ to DDB be something that obstructs you from loving it?

 ok, sorry. it was mostly tana's comment about new people not wanting silly rp. but something I have noticed is people are actually not just not silly, just different silly.

 Can you rephrase that? Because all of the not's have confused me.

 Ditto.

 I think I said what I meant to say above.

 Not exactly what I meant. I'm not saying that you didn't say what you mean. I'm saying that I'm confused about what you were saying, as in I can't understand it because there is too many nots

 No, I knew what you meant.

I think Tana's talking to Adam 

 Oh. Am confused now.

You said ditto, but Adam replied to all of y'all with 'I think I said what I meant to say'. 

Tana was talking to Adam responding with that. 

 Ohhhhh ok.

*cut because wow.*

yeah, and everyone seems like they are more shy about liking stuff. that said, I have different expiriences then people so I have different opinions.

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Note: Extremely blunt post

I think that the new(er) people need to rp with less silly ways. Because partially why I've stopped rping is because I can't have the deep conversations in rping that I like. That was basically the entire reason I rped in the first place.

They’re allowed to RP however they want, but I agree—I think that if we want to do goofy RPs, they should be in different threads than the more serious ones.

 I agree.

 on the job of making a silly rp thread

 I don't think that is needed. Considering basically all of the current rp threads are silly rp threads. It's the non-silly ones that we don't have.

 ok, then I'll do that! I want to help, I just don't know what to do.

 Wait. We shall discuss. Discuss before actions.

And deep rp threads have to be thought out. Think of any of Baalze's rp threads. That is what the in-depth lore I'm asking for.

Yep!

Adam: the whole point is to suggest things, not just do them (at least right now). We can’t just jump into action because that’s what we’ve been doing whenever people talk about changing the forums, and look how it’s gone.

What suggestions do you have?

And: why should being relatively ‘new’ to DDB be something that obstructs you from loving it?

 ok, sorry. it was mostly tana's comment about new people not wanting silly rp. but something I have noticed is people are actually not just not silly, just different silly.

 Can you rephrase that? Because all of the not's have confused me.

Firstly: Adam, you don't have to be sorry for liking DDB.

And yeah, what do you mean with the second part of that? 

 I wasn't sorry about liking ddb, about trying to rush into action. and I tried to say everyones still silly, just different silly.

...yes, sure, but that's irrelevant to the conversation. We're not talking about how silly people are; we're talking about how we want to separate silly RP from more serious RP. 

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

*cut because wow.*

yeah, and everyone seems like they are more shy about liking stuff. that said, I have different expiriences then people so I have different opinions.

 True.

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from Wes__ >>

Quote from Tana___ >>

Note: Extremely blunt post

I think that the new(er) people need to rp with less silly ways. Because partially why I've stopped rping is because I can't have the deep conversations in rping that I like. That was basically the entire reason I rped in the first place.

They’re allowed to RP however they want, but I agree—I think that if we want to do goofy RPs, they should be in different threads than the more serious ones.

 I agree.

 on the job of making a silly rp thread

 I don't think that is needed. Considering basically all of the current rp threads are silly rp threads. It's the non-silly ones that we don't have.

 ok, then I'll do that! I want to help, I just don't know what to do.

 Wait. We shall discuss. Discuss before actions.

And deep rp threads have to be thought out. Think of any of Baalze's rp threads. That is what the in-depth lore I'm asking for.

Yep!

Adam: the whole point is to suggest things, not just do them (at least right now). We can’t just jump into action because that’s what we’ve been doing whenever people talk about changing the forums, and look how it’s gone.

What suggestions do you have?

And: why should being relatively ‘new’ to DDB be something that obstructs you from loving it?

 ok, sorry. it was mostly tana's comment about new people not wanting silly rp. but something I have noticed is people are actually not just not silly, just different silly.

 Can you rephrase that? Because all of the not's have confused me.

Firstly: Adam, you don't have to be sorry for liking DDB.

And yeah, what do you mean with the second part of that? 

 I wasn't sorry about liking ddb, about trying to rush into action. and I tried to say everyones still silly, just different silly.

...yes, sure, but that's irrelevant to the conversation. We're not talking about how silly people are; we're talking about how we want to separate silly RP from more serious RP. 

 What would my storybook be?

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

*cut because wow.*

yeah, and everyone seems like they are more shy about liking stuff. that said, I have different expiriences then people so I have different opinions.

 True.

 which part? because they work for either.

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

Quote from LinkArcher >>

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

*cut because wow.*

yeah, and everyone seems like they are more shy about liking stuff. that said, I have different expiriences then people so I have different opinions.

 True.

 which part? because they work for either.

 True for both.

Quote from atomicgamer2012_13 >>

*cut because wow.*

yeah, and everyone seems like they are more shy about liking stuff. that said, I have different expiriences then people so I have different opinions.

I dunno, man. We have plenty of people willing to share their interests and whatnot throughout Adohand's. If people were to share/act upon more of their interests, then, what would that look like?