I was unaware of this option. But most cantrips already have really good range and I don't like the idea of a staff requiring 2 hands to be used as a focus.
I don't mind the idea of them, but only a cantrip range improvement isn't great. I might allow them in my games if someone asked and had a good reason for it, but only in eberron.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
Indeed, it was removed in the final version (v3) of the Wayfinder's Guide to Eberron - I see it in v2 of WGtE (the version of WGtE from just before the content went through UA), but not in v3. The sidebar in v2 matches the UA playtest content, but it was removed in the final version.
(Also, technically WGtE can be a valid source in the Eberron AL campaign, but only where its content matches that of Eberron: Rising from the Last War.)
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
It was an interesting addition but now I cannot find it
It isn't in Eberron Rising from the Last War.
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
Spells, Monsters, Subclasses, Races, Arcknight Class, Occultist Class, World, Enigmatic Esoterica forms
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
D&D Beyond FoundersIt was an idea presented in an Unearthed Arcana playtest, which has since completed:
Magic Items of Eberron
Pun-loving nerd | Faith Elisabeth Lilley | She/Her/Hers | Profile art by Becca Golins
If you need help with homebrew, please post on the homebrew forums, where multiple staff and moderators can read your post and help you!
"We got this, no problem! I'll take the twenty on the left - you guys handle the one on the right!"🔊
Wel thats to bad. guess I will have to drop a character note. just copy and paste from the UA
I was unaware of this option. But most cantrips already have really good range and I don't like the idea of a staff requiring 2 hands to be used as a focus.
I don't mind the idea of them, but only a cantrip range improvement isn't great. I might allow them in my games if someone asked and had a good reason for it, but only in eberron.
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
Spells, Monsters, Subclasses, Races, Arcknight Class, Occultist Class, World, Enigmatic Esoterica forms
As far as I know, the optional rule still exists in the Wayfinder’s Guide, which is still official (though not available in AL play).
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
D&D Beyond FoundersI'm not aware of it being in that sourcebook - do you have a link, or page reference?
Pun-loving nerd | Faith Elisabeth Lilley | She/Her/Hers | Profile art by Becca Golins
If you need help with homebrew, please post on the homebrew forums, where multiple staff and moderators can read your post and help you!
"We got this, no problem! I'll take the twenty on the left - you guys handle the one on the right!"🔊
Page 114 of Wayfarer's Guide.
Please check out my homebrew, I would appreciate feedback:
Spells, Monsters, Subclasses, Races, Arcknight Class, Occultist Class, World, Enigmatic Esoterica forms
I think it may actually have been removed when WGtE was updated to the finalized rules. I couldn't find it when looking at the latest .pdf.
Definitely not in DDB's version of WGtE. I don't have a PDF.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
ModeratorIndeed, it was removed in the final version (v3) of the Wayfinder's Guide to Eberron - I see it in v2 of WGtE (the version of WGtE from just before the content went through UA), but not in v3. The sidebar in v2 matches the UA playtest content, but it was removed in the final version.
(Also, technically WGtE can be a valid source in the Eberron AL campaign, but only where its content matches that of Eberron: Rising from the Last War.)