This always annoyed me. Sorcerers have no right being charisma based. Bards are probably the only Charisma based caster that makes sense. Paladins maybe, as you could say their oath is based on kindness/intimidation. Warlocks are a stretch, but you could say they need charisma to interact with their patron? Sorcerers have no reason at all. If it wouldn`t be crazily unbalanced, I would say it should be Con-based, with it being their bloodline and all. I think Wisdom would be a good fix, though.
This always annoyed me. Sorcerers have no right being charisma based. Bards are probably the only Charisma based caster that makes sense. Paladins maybe, as you could say their oath is based on kindness/intimidation. Warlocks are a stretch, but you could say they need charisma to interact with their patron? Sorcerers have no reason at all. If it wouldn`t be crazily unbalanced, I would say it should be Con-based, with it being their bloodline and all. I think Wisdom would be a good fix, though.
Please share your thoughts!
Studded Leather: He does exactly what I do
Natural Armor: But better
This was discussed in this thread: Should Sorcerers cast with Constitution instead of charisma? - Sorcerer - Class Forums - D&D Beyond Forums - D&D Beyond (dndbeyond.com).
Food, Scifi/fantasy, anime, DND 5E/RPG geek.