Gunslinger

And have some long rest cap on the quick shot

Make a feature that allows me to use cunning action to reload my pistol at 3rd level 

Pistols are more complex firearms mechanically since they must mechanically reject the cartridge after each shot, whereas revolvers leave the cartridge in the weapon. This is also why the Pistols can be reloaded as a bonus action - since new ammunition just has to be put into the weapon - whereas revolvers require a full action to reload.

• Pistols (cost 120g): have a range of 80/320 ft, deal 1d8 piercing damage on hit, and can fire 3 shots before needing to be reloaded as a Bonus action. If you roll a 1 on the d20 attack roll a pistol will jam, requiring you to spend an action clearing it. Pistols are Light weapons and can be used for dual wielding but you cannot clear or reload while dual wielding.
• Revolvers (cost 100g): have a range of 80/320 ft, deal 1d10 piercing damage on hit, and can fire 6 shots before needing to be reloaded as an Action.  Revolvers are Light weapons and can be used for dual wielding but you cannot reload while dual wielding. why dos the pistol cost mor the other is Beter

No real person obeys rules always, but mechanics should reinforce what your characters do most of the time. In this case, most of the time a good character shouldn't be torturing/intimidating other characters. That doesn't mean they can't do it occasionally but the mechanics of their character shouldn't encourage them to do it or make them especially good at doing it. Likewise an Evil character can occasionally be self-sacrificing but they shouldn't be acting self-sacrificially in every single fight nor should they be the most effective character at being self-sacrificing in the party. Hence why I restrict the options. 

It's no harsher than the proficiency restrictions for the different classes - a Mastermind Rogue really shouldn't know more about Nature than a Druid, and the Druid shouldn't know more about Arcane magic than a wizard. 

PS I couldn't figure out a way to actually limit the options by alignment so its all just flavour text that people are free to ignore if they wish. Just as they are free to interpret "good" and "evil" however they wish. But I stand by the alignment limitations, and if you are playing a "good" character that routinely threatens to blow someone's head/fingers off with their gun, you should really consider whether that character wouldn't be better described as "neutral".

Well, that's kind of tied into the problem a lot of people have with D&D's alignment system. An evil person can still have people they love, and therefore people they would sacrifice themselves for. A good person can still make use of intimidation, especially if it's against someone they believe is evil and if they're doing it for what they believe is the greater good.

I think it would be fine to not gate the options behind alignment. Then it's up to the player how they use it, and it can be up to the DM whether either one is being used for good or evil.

The alignment restrictions are there because they make sense. The Honourable Duel feature is putting yourself at risk to protect the rest of the party, which is something Evil characters shouldn't be doing, but Good characters should. Whereas the Shoot First, Ask Questions Later feature encourages torturing your prisoners, which is definitely not something Good characters should be doing. 

I like the gunslinger code abilities but I think its a little annoying that the abilities are alignment restricted.

Updates for Version 1.1:

• Added option of "Shoot first, ask questions later"
• Added feature actions that appear on character sheets correctly.