Monstrous Compendium Vol. 1: Spelljammer Creatures
Frozen Sick
D&D Beyond Basic Rules
Basic Rules (2014)
Sign in to view your library & saved favorites.
Sign in- Marketplace
Monstrous Compendium Vol. 1: Spelljammer CreaturesFrozen SickD&D Beyond Basic RulesBasic Rules (2014)Sign in to view your library & saved favorites.
Sign in
This feature CAN dish out a large amount of damage. This feature CAN be used twice per round with clever play.
There's only one question I have:
Why is it limited to attacks with finesse or ranged weapons specifically instead of generalizing to attacks using Dexterity like the 2024/5.5e Barbarian uses attacks using Strength?
The only real effect this has is allowing Barbarian-Rogues and inhibiting Monk-Rogues. I don't speak for anyone but myself, but I speak honestly when I say: I'd rather be able to sneak attack with a punch than rage as a rogue.
How can cleaver play get a thief to do sneak attack twice in a round?
Aren't finesse and range weapons dex based?
Why should any ability of a class be designed for promoting multi classing character?
By attacking again on someone else's turn. The most obvious way to do this is via an Opportunity Attack, but there are various other ways.
Ranged weapons are. Finesse weapons can use either Strength or Dexterity. This person's specific complaint is that not referencing Dexterity-based attacks specifically means they can't use Sneak Attack on Unarmed Strikes even if (as a Monk) they could make those using Dexterity.
They shouldn't.
pronouns: he/she/they
You could still use Sneak Attack with your Monk, you would just need to use a Finesse weapon instead of your fists. Limiting the weapon type actually allows for a wider range of possible multi-class options than it would if it just required Dexterity-based attacks (which for anyone other than a Monk, means a Finesse or ranged weapon anyways).