When i try to share a subclass i get the reasons "This homebrew Subclass has data mapped to it that is licensed content or private homebrew. This typically occurs when licensed or private homebrew spells are linked to the Subclass."
I have try to go through all the build and use remove link, but i still get the reasons.
To troubleshoot i have try to remake the subclass, but even a completely new COPY_OF_Battle Smith without any changes has the same reason.
The warning you are receiving means that there is content, usually spells, associated with your subclass that are not a part of the free Basic Rules / SRD. You cannot publicly share homebrew on D&D Beyond that includes that content. You would need to change your homebrew to not include content from non-free sources in order to publish it.
For battle smith aura of vitality, conjure barrage, aura of purity, and banishing smite are all not free spells and would have to be changed to be shared.
I believe the licenced content restriction is under review.
When i try to share a subclass i get the reasons "This homebrew Subclass has data mapped to it that is licensed content or private homebrew. This typically occurs when licensed or private homebrew spells are linked to the Subclass."
I have try to go through all the build and use remove link, but i still get the reasons.
To troubleshoot i have try to remake the subclass, but even a completely new COPY_OF_Battle Smith without any changes has the same reason.
Link to the subclass im trying to share https://www.dndbeyond.com/subclasses/368028-runesmith-not-working
The warning you are receiving means that there is content, usually spells, associated with your subclass that are not a part of the free Basic Rules / SRD. You cannot publicly share homebrew on D&D Beyond that includes that content. You would need to change your homebrew to not include content from non-free sources in order to publish it.
Hope that helps!
For battle smith aura of vitality, conjure barrage, aura of purity, and banishing smite are all not free spells and would have to be changed to be shared.
I believe the licenced content restriction is under review.
Thx.
The part of non-free sources, is what i didn't know.