In the 2024 DMG and on line, the dimensions of the Bag of Holding reads as: "dimensions—roughly 2 feet square and 4 feet deep on the inside. The bag can hold up to 500 pounds, not exceeding a volume of 64 cubic feet."
If the ‘inside' extradimensional space dimensions are 2-feet by 2-feet by 4-feet, as stated, that is a total volume of 16 cubic feet, not 64 cubic feet, which would be 4-feet by 4-feet by 4-feet.
So is the internal space 16 cubic feet or 64 cubic feet?
The 2 ft square is the opening. The 4 ft deep is the inside. The inside is shapeless - like a sack - so would be 4 ft by 4 ft by 4 ft. 4x4x4 = 64. The interior is 64 cubic ft in volume.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Click ✨ HERE ✨ For My Youtube Videos featuring Guides, Tips & Tricks for using D&D Beyond. Need help with Homebrew? Check out ✨ thisFAQ/Guide thread ✨ by IamSposta.
You can also just ignore the internal measurements and go off weight alone. Notice said "internal measurements" because the bag's opening is still defined, and some DMs will hold to that.
If we were going to take the bag at its word, then fitting things like staves, spears, halberds and many types of greatsword in the bag would be impossible, since they exceed 4 feet long. The Typical Zweihander ( approx 7 feet), Montante ( between 6.5 and 7 feet), or Oodachi ( approx 7.5 feet) are all longer than 4 feet, a quarterstaff is often historically 6 to 9 feet, but do we really want to open the can of worms of "That is too long to put in your bag of holding."
Heck sometimes the opening is ignored. A lot of DM will let you store shields that should be too big to fit in a 2 foot opening in them with no problem. When i am running games i treat it as almost cartoon hammerspace and will make on the spot rulings of when something doesn't fit. Does lead to a lot of: "No you can't put the adult dragon in the bag of holding." "No you can not put the storm giant in your bag of holding and give her a piggyback ride. But creative thinking." "No you can't put the church in the bag of holding."
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
He/Him. Loooooooooong time Player. The Dark days of the THAC0 system are behind us.
"Hope is a fire that burns in us all If only an ember, awaiting your call To rise up in triumph should we all unite The spark for change is yours to ignite." Kalandra - The State of the World
It's not a fixed space. It can hold up to 64 cubic feet. But I agree the 2024 description is "deceptive".
It's clearly indicating the same as the 2014 one:
This bag has an interior space considerably larger than its outside dimensions, roughly 2 feet in diameter at the mouth and 4 feet deep.
but taken in isolation does not read the same.
At my tables it's played as "You can fit up to 64cuft in it, as long as that fits through a 2ft square opening" (which generally includes ignoring the depth sometimes).
In the 2024 DMG and on line, the dimensions of the Bag of Holding reads as: "dimensions—roughly 2 feet square and 4 feet deep on the inside. The bag can hold up to 500 pounds, not exceeding a volume of 64 cubic feet."
If the ‘inside' extradimensional space dimensions are 2-feet by 2-feet by 4-feet, as stated, that is a total volume of 16 cubic feet, not 64 cubic feet, which would be 4-feet by 4-feet by 4-feet.
So is the internal space 16 cubic feet or 64 cubic feet?
The 2 ft square is the opening. The 4 ft deep is the inside. The inside is shapeless - like a sack - so would be 4 ft by 4 ft by 4 ft. 4x4x4 = 64. The interior is 64 cubic ft in volume.
Click ✨ HERE ✨ For My Youtube Videos featuring Guides, Tips & Tricks for using D&D Beyond.
Need help with Homebrew? Check out ✨ this FAQ/Guide thread ✨ by IamSposta.
You can also just ignore the internal measurements and go off weight alone. Notice said "internal measurements" because the bag's opening is still defined, and some DMs will hold to that.
If we were going to take the bag at its word, then fitting things like staves, spears, halberds and many types of greatsword in the bag would be impossible, since they exceed 4 feet long.
The Typical Zweihander ( approx 7 feet), Montante ( between 6.5 and 7 feet), or Oodachi ( approx 7.5 feet) are all longer than 4 feet, a quarterstaff is often historically 6 to 9 feet, but do we really want to open the can of worms of "That is too long to put in your bag of holding."
Heck sometimes the opening is ignored. A lot of DM will let you store shields that should be too big to fit in a 2 foot opening in them with no problem.
When i am running games i treat it as almost cartoon hammerspace and will make on the spot rulings of when something doesn't fit. Does lead to a lot of:
"No you can't put the adult dragon in the bag of holding."
"No you can not put the storm giant in your bag of holding and give her a piggyback ride. But creative thinking."
"No you can't put the church in the bag of holding."
He/Him. Loooooooooong time Player.
The Dark days of the THAC0 system are behind us.
"Hope is a fire that burns in us all If only an ember, awaiting your call
To rise up in triumph should we all unite
The spark for change is yours to ignite."
Kalandra - The State of the World
It's not a fixed space. It can hold up to 64 cubic feet. But I agree the 2024 description is "deceptive".
It's clearly indicating the same as the 2014 one:
but taken in isolation does not read the same.
At my tables it's played as "You can fit up to 64cuft in it, as long as that fits through a 2ft square opening" (which generally includes ignoring the depth sometimes).
Note, a 4 ft x 4 ft x 4ft container has a diagonal of 6.92 ft, That should fit most Montante swords.
If the opening is at one corner rather than the center of a cube, I see no reason to prevent any weapon of less than 6' 11"
Similarly, a shield that fits in a rectangle of no more than 2.8 ft by 5 1/2 ft should also be able to fit inside a 2 ft x 2 ft square opening