Why is it that all these NPC casters seem to have never picked useful or good spells on their stat block. Almost every spell is a damage one. Lots of power word kill very little wish/foresight, loads of fireball and lightning bolt, but very limited on tiny hut. Very little on wall of force/creation or mirage arcane.
I find it difficult to believe very powerful casters choose to not learn mind blank or wish or demiplane. Where is the utility spells?
I often feel like NPCs are not even the same species they have way more hp and initiate. At will spells all over the place. I don't mind a monster sure but like an arch mage or a noble prodigy are ment to be the same species as the players..
D&D is an "asymmetric" system. Meaning that 'monsters', while having the same basic stats such as AC, ability scores etc, do not necessarily follow the same "rules" as player characters.
In the case of NPCs, i.e. mostly monsters that are Humanoids with class-like traits, then the ones in the Monster Manual and similar books are generally written with the concept of them being antagonists and that PCs will basically be fighting them. Hence the focus on combat spells.
But...as a DM, you are also entirely free to change these spells (or any other abilities) if you want an NPC that needs to fulfil some other role rather than "monster to kill". You don't even have to be too formal about it. If this is a 'one-off' NPC that the PCs visit for help, and you want that NPC to use the Archmage state block but have the Divination spell, then they have the Divination spell. That simple.
Why is it that all these NPC casters seem to have never picked useful or good spells on their stat block. Almost every spell is a damage one. Lots of power word kill very little wish/foresight, loads of fireball and lightning bolt, but very limited on tiny hut. Very little on wall of force/creation or mirage arcane.
Because stat blocks are primarily for combat and thus reflect the combat-relevant information for the NPC. It's uncommon to encounter the same NPC in a combat and non-combat situation so it's rare for the stat block to list both combat and non-combat information.
If an NPC is meant to participate in the story in a non-combat role, they'll usually have a modified stat block. For example you might have Thestos the Spellwright who uses the Mage stat block, but also has the spells Message, Sending, and Skywrite prepared.
When it comes to combat, the DM has a lot of information to parse, so stat blocks need to be as efficient as possible. You don't need to be flipping through 7 different spells, only to find out 3 of them are completely irrelevant to combat.
I find it difficult to believe very powerful casters choose to not learn mind blank or wish or demiplane. Where is the utility spells?
What fun is Wish on an NPC? Some do have Mind Blank or Demiplane, but not on their stat block. It'll be in their description or traits, such as "X casts Mind Blank on before combat on themselves" and the resistances and immunities are listed in their stat block.
I often feel like NPCs are not even the same species they have way more hp and initiate. At will spells all over the place. I don't mind a monster sure but like an arch mage or a noble prodigy are ment to be the same species as the players..
Yes, because D&D is an asymmetric game. NPC HP is determined by size category, not class—tiny is d6, small and medium are d8, large is d10, huge is d12, and gargantuan is d20. Some NPCs add their proficiency bonus to their initiative because that matters more for balanced game design. You're confusing "same species" with "mechanically designed the same".
This has been a complaint by some of us for quite some time now. You can of course solve this, just by making a character sheet for that NPC following the same rules that PCs must follow. That's what we do. If it's an NPC and has a class, it gets all abilities that a PC would get, and follows the same rules.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Playing D&D since 1982
Have played every version of the game since Basic (original Red Box Set), except that abomination sometimes called 4e.
This has been a complaint by some of us for quite some time now. You can of course solve this, just by making a character sheet for that NPC following the same rules that PCs must follow. That's what we do. If it's an NPC and has a class, it gets all abilities that a PC would get, and follows the same rules.
OP should be aware that doing this will lead to NPC enemies that perform considerably differently in combat.
If you have ever been blocked in a room with a tiny hut, or put in the microwave with a wall of force and sickening radience combo, I think you can see why people in the design team wouldn't want to encourage DMs to do that to players by putting those spells out there on the NPC sheet.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
He/Him. Loooooooooong time Player. The Dark days of the THAC0 system are behind us.
"Hope is a fire that burns in us all If only an ember, awaiting your call To rise up in triumph should we all unite The spark for change is yours to ignite." Kalandra - The State of the World
I alter stat blocks all the time. On occasion I even change things mid-combat. If I think an NPC or a monster should have a spell or an ability, I just give it to them.
I want the NPC using the most effective tools they would have available in conjunction with their int and wis stats. The PC are special but do not hold the monopoly on tactics and brains
I want the NPC using the most effective tools they would have available in conjunction with their int and wis stats. The PC are special but do not hold the monopoly on tactics and brains
Unfortunately, that is unlikely to create a fun encounter. How fun do you think it would be for your precious PC to get cheese gratered to death by a monk?
I find it difficult to believe very powerful casters choose to not learn mind blank or wish or demiplane. Where is the utility spells?
2024 stat blocks are designed to be easy to use in combat; non-combat capabilities are generally not listed (this is not limited to spellcasters), and there's pretty much no effort to be simulationist. It is assumed that the DM will just fill them in (incidentally, most utility spells have zero effect on CR, so as a DM you can just... add them).
It's certainly possible to just build NPCs like they were PCs (there's no rule for xp value; if you actually need it, I suggest 150-200% of the High difficulty budget for a PC of the same level), it's just a significant block of work that really doesn't pay off for minor NPCs.
If you give the NPCs Wish, they can just Wish whatever plan they have going on to succeed, and the PCs have nothing to do. And now your Campaign is about going to the corner store to buy rations, since the evil cult runs the world.
That's... really not how the Wish spell works. It can potentially do a lot, but presumably the same caveat that prevents PCs from immediately ending a campaign with it keeps it from being a Cosmic Cube for BBEGs as well.
That's... really not how the Wish spell works. It can potentially do a lot, but presumably the same caveat that prevents PCs from immediately ending a campaign with it keeps it from being a Cosmic Cube for BBEGs as well.
"THE COSMIC CUBE CAN DO ANYTHING!"-old-school Marvel "No, not that"-Wish vs. the DM.
I think Wish has to alter what is, not what will be, lore-wise. It isn't chaos manipulation:It's reality warping.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
DM, player & homebrewer(Current homebrew project is an unofficial conversion of SBURB/SGRUB from Homestuck into DND 5e)
Once made Maxwell's Silver Hammer come down upon Strahd's head to make sure he was dead.
Always study & sharpen philosophical razors. They save a lot of trouble.
I think Wish has to alter what is, not what will be, lore-wise. It isn't chaos manipulation:It's reality warping.
Wish when used by NPCs can do whatever the plot calls for. Typically that's not a huge amount, because "X happened because someone Wished for it" is a lot less interesting than "X happened because <insert evil scheme>", and it's not like the DM can't just announce stuff happening with or without wish.
Another important thing to consider is that NPC spellcasters probably aren't "optimizers" the same way PCs are. Why would a Diviner learn Forcecage when Teleport is more useful in broader situations and also a great way to get out of fights?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Why is it that all these NPC casters seem to have never picked useful or good spells on their stat block. Almost every spell is a damage one. Lots of power word kill very little wish/foresight, loads of fireball and lightning bolt, but very limited on tiny hut. Very little on wall of force/creation or mirage arcane.
I find it difficult to believe very powerful casters choose to not learn mind blank or wish or demiplane. Where is the utility spells?
I often feel like NPCs are not even the same species they have way more hp and initiate. At will spells all over the place. I don't mind a monster sure but like an arch mage or a noble prodigy are ment to be the same species as the players..
D&D is an "asymmetric" system. Meaning that 'monsters', while having the same basic stats such as AC, ability scores etc, do not necessarily follow the same "rules" as player characters.
In the case of NPCs, i.e. mostly monsters that are Humanoids with class-like traits, then the ones in the Monster Manual and similar books are generally written with the concept of them being antagonists and that PCs will basically be fighting them. Hence the focus on combat spells.
But...as a DM, you are also entirely free to change these spells (or any other abilities) if you want an NPC that needs to fulfil some other role rather than "monster to kill". You don't even have to be too formal about it. If this is a 'one-off' NPC that the PCs visit for help, and you want that NPC to use the Archmage state block but have the Divination spell, then they have the Divination spell. That simple.
Because stat blocks are primarily for combat and thus reflect the combat-relevant information for the NPC. It's uncommon to encounter the same NPC in a combat and non-combat situation so it's rare for the stat block to list both combat and non-combat information.
If an NPC is meant to participate in the story in a non-combat role, they'll usually have a modified stat block. For example you might have Thestos the Spellwright who uses the Mage stat block, but also has the spells Message, Sending, and Skywrite prepared.
When it comes to combat, the DM has a lot of information to parse, so stat blocks need to be as efficient as possible. You don't need to be flipping through 7 different spells, only to find out 3 of them are completely irrelevant to combat.
What fun is Wish on an NPC? Some do have Mind Blank or Demiplane, but not on their stat block. It'll be in their description or traits, such as "X casts Mind Blank on before combat on themselves" and the resistances and immunities are listed in their stat block.
Yes, because D&D is an asymmetric game. NPC HP is determined by size category, not class—tiny is d6, small and medium are d8, large is d10, huge is d12, and gargantuan is d20. Some NPCs add their proficiency bonus to their initiative because that matters more for balanced game design. You're confusing "same species" with "mechanically designed the same".
Find my D&D Beyond articles here
This has been a complaint by some of us for quite some time now. You can of course solve this, just by making a character sheet for that NPC following the same rules that PCs must follow. That's what we do. If it's an NPC and has a class, it gets all abilities that a PC would get, and follows the same rules.
Playing D&D since 1982
Have played every version of the game since Basic (original Red Box Set), except that abomination sometimes called 4e.
OP should be aware that doing this will lead to NPC enemies that perform considerably differently in combat.
Most NPC spellcasters don't have Forcecage or similar because no one likes spending their turns in a magic box.
If you have ever been blocked in a room with a tiny hut, or put in the microwave with a wall of force and sickening radience combo, I think you can see why people in the design team wouldn't want to encourage DMs to do that to players by putting those spells out there on the NPC sheet.
He/Him. Loooooooooong time Player.
The Dark days of the THAC0 system are behind us.
"Hope is a fire that burns in us all If only an ember, awaiting your call
To rise up in triumph should we all unite
The spark for change is yours to ignite."
Kalandra - The State of the World
I alter stat blocks all the time. On occasion I even change things mid-combat. If I think an NPC or a monster should have a spell or an ability, I just give it to them.
I want the NPC using the most effective tools they would have available in conjunction with their int and wis stats. The PC are special but do not hold the monopoly on tactics and brains
Unfortunately, that is unlikely to create a fun encounter. How fun do you think it would be for your precious PC to get cheese gratered to death by a monk?
2024 stat blocks are designed to be easy to use in combat; non-combat capabilities are generally not listed (this is not limited to spellcasters), and there's pretty much no effort to be simulationist. It is assumed that the DM will just fill them in (incidentally, most utility spells have zero effect on CR, so as a DM you can just... add them).
It's certainly possible to just build NPCs like they were PCs (there's no rule for xp value; if you actually need it, I suggest 150-200% of the High difficulty budget for a PC of the same level), it's just a significant block of work that really doesn't pay off for minor NPCs.
If you give the NPCs Wish, they can just Wish whatever plan they have going on to succeed, and the PCs have nothing to do. And now your Campaign is about going to the corner store to buy rations, since the evil cult runs the world.
That's... really not how the Wish spell works. It can potentially do a lot, but presumably the same caveat that prevents PCs from immediately ending a campaign with it keeps it from being a Cosmic Cube for BBEGs as well.
"THE COSMIC CUBE CAN DO ANYTHING!"-old-school Marvel
"No, not that"-Wish vs. the DM.
I think Wish has to alter what is, not what will be, lore-wise. It isn't chaos manipulation:It's reality warping.
DM, player & homebrewer(Current homebrew project is an unofficial conversion of SBURB/SGRUB from Homestuck into DND 5e)
Once made Maxwell's Silver Hammer come down upon Strahd's head to make sure he was dead.
Always study & sharpen philosophical razors. They save a lot of trouble.
Wish when used by NPCs can do whatever the plot calls for. Typically that's not a huge amount, because "X happened because someone Wished for it" is a lot less interesting than "X happened because <insert evil scheme>", and it's not like the DM can't just announce stuff happening with or without wish.
Another important thing to consider is that NPC spellcasters probably aren't "optimizers" the same way PCs are. Why would a Diviner learn Forcecage when Teleport is more useful in broader situations and also a great way to get out of fights?