Tis might be a larger issue, but 2014 expanded languages are not available in character options for 2024 species. Missing as an example is Quori which was not updated for 2024 rule set and should abe accessible through legacy 2014 content like Rising from the Last War?
Additionally missing Daelkyr and Riedran.
True... Riedran at least should be considered a 'standard language' in Eberron, and Kalashtar should have Quori as a bonus language, or at least as a language option. Daelkyr should also be available as a selectable language in Eberron campaigns.
I can't access my book, even though I purchased it several hours ago and my licenses page says everything is synced. The license for EFotA does not appear. Edit: I somehow purchased ERftLW instead of EFotA. Even though I already owned ERftLW. So. That's annoying, but not the problem I thought it was.
Repeating Shot isn't allowing for all the Firearms, or other Weapons that have the Ammunition property. Despite saying it can be any Ranged Weapon with the Ammunition property.
Also there are several Feats that just do not show up for Artificer. Basically any of the 3rd Party books. 1 for Example, that I was just looking for Gun-Mage Adept.
Mark of Sentinel does not grant a Reaction for the Vigilant Guardian feature under the Actions tab, nor under the Limited Use tab, so there's nothing in place to keep track of the number of uses.
Using the Artificer's Replicate Magic Item ability does not always grant the abilities of the item replicated. For instance, replicating Goggles of Night and equipping them does not grant Darkvision on your character sheet.
Edit: This one seems to work now. One day she didn't have darkvision, now she does, even though I haven't touched the character since I reported the issue.
Using the Artificer's Replicate Magic Item ability does not always grant the abilities of the item replicated. For instance, replicating Goggles of Night and equipping them does not grant Darkvision on your character sheet.
Seems to work on mine.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Need help with D&D Beyond? Come ask in the official D&D server on Discord: https://discord.gg/dnd
Although it's correct in the digital book itself, the details page for the dragonmark spell version of the Boon of Siberys feat has a typo: it says "Siberys Dragonmark Seplls" above the table.
Like many I have the same problem with the Potent Dragonmark feat as it doesn't apply any of the benefits it list on it's description, even when I meet all prerequisites.
if someone has homebrewed something that mimics this feat to a similar effect I would be thankful.
I think that us Beyond users would really appreciate a message from Wotc about the Potent Dragonmark not working at all, and Aberrant Dragonmark not giving the +1 to the ability (at least on the Potent Dragonmark).
Like others said that this is official material with an actual cost of money and we haven't gotten any real confirmation if a complete fix in progress, or somekind of workaround is coming up before the big overhaul?
Or even "sorry, this one will have to wait for the overhaul that might come 2026-27" etc?
This one's frustrating as this isn’t achievable easily through homebrew either
I was able to Add Potent Dragon Mark into a class but it basically involved adding a class feature in the subclass itself. I tried to make it as it's own feat but with how feats work, the spells showed up at will instead of as castable with spell slots. I am assuming this is the issue with why it isn't showing anything as a feat when added.
Using the Artificer's Replicate Magic Item ability does not always grant the abilities of the item replicated. For instance, replicating Goggles of Night and equipping them does not grant Darkvision on your character sheet.
Seems to work on mine.
It works on mine now too... Not sure what changed. I haven't touched the character since I reported the issue. Weird...
So, when do we get some update/acknowledgement about Potent Dragonmark? It's been awhile, and no updates on what's going on with that one. I think at this point, we either need a "fix" or an official statement of some kind.
True... Riedran at least should be considered a 'standard language' in Eberron, and Kalashtar should have Quori as a bonus language, or at least as a language option. Daelkyr should also be available as a selectable language in Eberron campaigns.
Homebrew and 2014 Core rules spells are not showing up with the new artificer. I have all the sources turned on.
Armorer Armor Models do not allow you to Make the "SIMPLE WEAPON" from the arcane Armor A +1 Version of that weapon.
Homebrew spells would need to be updated to be put on the class list for the new class first.
pronouns: he/she/they
I can't access my book, even though I purchased it several hours ago and my licenses page says everything is synced. The license for EFotA does not appear.
Edit: I somehow purchased ERftLW instead of EFotA. Even though I already owned ERftLW. So. That's annoying, but not the problem I thought it was.
Can't select Flametongue Greatsword as a Magic Item Plan and still can't select Elemental Adept multiple times.
Starting to lose faith. Lol
Repeating Shot isn't allowing for all the Firearms, or other Weapons that have the Ammunition property. Despite saying it can be any Ranged Weapon with the Ammunition property.
Also there are several Feats that just do not show up for Artificer. Basically any of the 3rd Party books. 1 for Example, that I was just looking for Gun-Mage Adept.
"Not getting cut into bloody littles slices, That's the key to a sound plan."
Mark of Sentinel does not grant a Reaction for the Vigilant Guardian feature under the Actions tab, nor under the Limited Use tab, so there's nothing in place to keep track of the number of uses.
Using the Artificer's Replicate Magic Item ability does not always grant the abilities of the item replicated. For instance, replicating Goggles of Night and equipping them does not grant Darkvision on your character sheet.
Edit: This one seems to work now. One day she didn't have darkvision, now she does, even though I haven't touched the character since I reported the issue.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
ModeratorFixed on the site! Should be fixed for the app in the next book update as well.
Need help with D&D Beyond? Come ask in the official D&D server on Discord: https://discord.gg/dnd
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
ModeratorI've got them on dev's to-do list (along with everything else in this post), but I'm afraid that's the extent of my power. 😅
Need help with D&D Beyond? Come ask in the official D&D server on Discord: https://discord.gg/dnd
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
ModeratorSeems to work on mine.
Need help with D&D Beyond? Come ask in the official D&D server on Discord: https://discord.gg/dnd
Although it's correct in the digital book itself, the details page for the dragonmark spell version of the Boon of Siberys feat has a typo: it says "Siberys Dragonmark Seplls" above the table.
pronouns: he/she/they
You are a hero.
Not able to pick any of the species options from here even though my DM has content sharing on.
Are you making the character in the campaign where the content is shared? Do you have Expanded Rules turned on?
pronouns: he/she/they
Like many I have the same problem with the Potent Dragonmark feat as it doesn't apply any of the benefits it list on it's description, even when I meet all prerequisites.
if someone has homebrewed something that mimics this feat to a similar effect I would be thankful.
I think that us Beyond users would really appreciate a message from Wotc about the Potent Dragonmark not working at all, and Aberrant Dragonmark not giving the +1 to the ability (at least on the Potent Dragonmark).
Like others said that this is official material with an actual cost of money and we haven't gotten any real confirmation if a complete fix in progress, or somekind of workaround is coming up before the big overhaul?
Or even "sorry, this one will have to wait for the overhaul that might come 2026-27" etc?
This one's frustrating as this isn’t achievable easily through homebrew either
I was able to Add Potent Dragon Mark into a class but it basically involved adding a class feature in the subclass itself. I tried to make it as it's own feat but with how feats work, the spells showed up at will instead of as castable with spell slots. I am assuming this is the issue with why it isn't showing anything as a feat when added.
It works on mine now too... Not sure what changed. I haven't touched the character since I reported the issue. Weird...
So, when do we get some update/acknowledgement about Potent Dragonmark? It's been awhile, and no updates on what's going on with that one. I think at this point, we either need a "fix" or an official statement of some kind.