We've reached the point in a thread where people are just repeating their arguments. Time for both sides to recognize that anyone who doesn't already agree with them isn't going to be convinced.
If a dm wants to allow it in their campaign, thats their choice, but a player trying to tell me i should allow it in my campaign because their interpretation of free upcasting with zero side effects is raw? Nope.
Nobody is telling you that. This is a RAW discussion. You don't HAVE to rule your game strictly RAW. The vast majority of DMs don't do that. But the very fact that this is a controversial topic should drive you to clarify your position on this as a house-rule, whether your interpretation is RAW or not.
As Pantagruel said, at this point it's clear that you're not listening to what anybody says and you just keep repeating the same points over and over even though they've already been addressed.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
We've reached the point in a thread where people are just repeating their arguments. Time for both sides to recognize that anyone who doesn't already agree with them isn't going to be convinced.
Nobody is telling you that. This is a RAW discussion. You don't HAVE to rule your game strictly RAW. The vast majority of DMs don't do that. But the very fact that this is a controversial topic should drive you to clarify your position on this as a house-rule, whether your interpretation is RAW or not.
As Pantagruel said, at this point it's clear that you're not listening to what anybody says and you just keep repeating the same points over and over even though they've already been addressed.