This item appears to be a longsword hilt. While grasping the hilt, you can use a bonus action to cause a blade of pure radiance to spring into existence, or make the blade disappear. While the blade exists, this magic longsword has the finesse property. If you are proficient with shortswords or longswords, you are proficient with the sun blade.
You gain a +2 bonus to attack and damage rolls made with this weapon, which deals radiant damage instead of slashing damage. When you hit an undead with it, that target takes an extra 1d8 radiant damage.
The sword's luminous blade emits bright light in a 15-foot radius and dim light for an additional 15 feet. The light is sunlight. While the blade persists, you can use an action to expand or reduce its radius of bright and dim light by 5 feet each, to a maximum of 30 feet each or a minimum of 10 feet each.
Proficiency with a Longsword allows you to add your proficiency bonus to the attack roll for any attack you make with it.
This weapon has the following mastery property. To use this property, you must have a feature that lets you use it.
Sap. If you hit a creature with this weapon, that creature has Disadvantage on its next attack roll before the start of your next turn.
Notes: Bonus: Magic, Damage: Radiant, Replace Damage Type: Radiant, Weapon Property: Finesse, Damage, Combat, Versatile, Sap







-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Jul 15, 2018Question: This item seems to have two somewhat contradictory statements in it:
(1) "If you are proficient with shortswords or longswords, you are proficient with the sun blade."
and
(2) "Proficiency with a longsword allows you to add your proficiency bonus to the attack roll for any attack you make with it."
Doesn't statement #1 ALONE IMPLY that you would add your proficiency score to the attack roll if you were PROFICIENT with either a SHORTSWORD or a LONGSWORD? Then why add statement #2 at all? and... more importantly, why does statement #2 partially CONTRADICT statement #1
So.... If you are "proficient with a shortsword" are you proficient with sun blade or not?
AND.... IT'S A BIG DEAL.... because.....while we are on that topic... It further states that "this magic longsword has the finesse property" ! Sooo..... does this imply that a character who normally only uses SHORTSWORDS with DEXTERITY (not strength) can now suddenly use this LONGSWORD as a LONGSWORD, but using their DEXTERITY for the attack, taking advantage of a longsword's 1d8 slashing damage one handed.... and 1d10 slashing damage TWO HANDED!?? And on top of that you add +2 to hit AND +2 damage? (Plus 1d8 damage on top of that to Undead!?) THAT is GREAT for someone who normally USES a LONGSWORD (with strength) but CRAZY GREAT weapon for someone who normally CAN'T use a longsword, but only uses short sword.... Um.... Imagine taking away a dexterity-users shortsword that normally does 1d6+dex damage, and replacing it with a two-handed longsword that can do 1d10+dex+2+1d8 to undead..... You went from an average damage of 3.5 + dex.... to 7.5 + dex (+4.5 to undead!)....
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
Um. OK. Nevermind. I just now realized that EVERY CLASS that is PROFICIENT with a short sword is ALSO proficient with a LONG SWORD except the MONK...... And, in that case, the Longsword would still NOT be counted as a "monk" weapon.... So using this great, shortsword/as a longsword would NOT be practical for a Monk.... So its a moot point. (I'll leave my comment here anyhow.... Maybe someone will correct the typo in the DM Guide or something.... ha. Or maybe someone reading this has a Monk character, or is a DM with a Monk character and wants to read my ravings on this topic.)
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Sep 26, 2018So it's basically a lightsaber.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Oct 20, 2018How much does it cost? treasure points? GP?
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Nov 3, 2018if a character wielding a sun blade is invisible. Would the light that it emits be invisible as well?
My gut rule is to say no. That the source of the light is, but the light itself is not.
Thoughts?
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Nov 11, 2018Invisible to everything but truesight
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 27, 2018You can work it in to your back story useing trinkets
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Jan 1, 2019Hmm, guess what magical weapon I gave my friend who is a Star Wars fan? It's a pretty hard question, but...
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Jan 9, 2019It fit perfectly into my new characters backstory. He is a Pact of the Blade Celestial Warlock. His pact weapon was a gift from his patron. Guess what it was. ;)
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Mar 3, 2019Jeremy Crawford says not a monk weapon: https://www.sageadvice.eu/2015/10/19/can-a-sunblade-be-used-as-a-monk-weapon/
He also says, as DM, he'd probably allow a monk to use it nonetheless.
Personally I'd rule its size is determined by the wielder. So dexterity classes would use it as a shortsword (and in Monk case, at higher level you'd get to use d8/d10).
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Mar 19, 2019It's not a question of a typo, it's a question of mechanical transclusion on D&D Beyond. That text doesn't exist in the DMG. It exists in D&D Beyond because the item is templated from a generic longsword.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Apr 15, 2019Thanks for the clarification!
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Apr 15, 2019Thanks for clarifying this. I didnt notice the template thing until you did. The text also exists in the moonblade details.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Jul 31, 2019Yeah, my rogue in a recent campaign had a sun blade, and it took me a while to realize I could use it 2-handed and get a d10 damage dice, because I was just so used to the limitation on my sneak attack capabilities, and also wanting to use my Dex instead of Str. So in the end for a rogue, it could be 1d10+Dex+2+1d8toUndead+SneakAttackDice. It was glorious, especially on a Crit.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Nov 9, 2019Is it too OP to give a bunch of minions facing a LVL 4 party (2 people, I know it’s small) these blades? The minions aren’t that powerful, and bumping their +2 to hit up to a +4 wouldn’t be too OP, or atleast I don’t think.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Nov 19, 2019Hi friend! Ultimately, you should go with what makes the most sense for your players and your setting.
My honest advice as a DM is that this might be unbalancing. These are Rare magic items and, if not wholly unique and one-of-a-kind, should probably be reserved for an impactful, significant event rather than be relegated to the hands of minions, unless you’re just looking for a way to hand them to your players.
The caveat here is that the needs/fun of your campaign supersedes anything else. Maybe these minions just ransacked a holy temple of the sun and are making good with their contraband weapons when your two heroes show up to stop them.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 6, 2019Thanks, that helps a lot. I’ll think about my options. I’m running the game in two weeks (I started pretty early).
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 26, 2019It's just sort of Default Text since Sun Blade is a Longsword. So it's a shortsword that does Longsword damage.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Feb 7, 2020Loving the fact that Sneak Attack with this weapons deals additional radiant damage. which is way more useful than slashing, piercing or bludgeoning damage :)
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Feb 29, 2020- View User Profile
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
Posted <1 min agoI think instead giving you minions the exact blade but instead have them somehow have weaker versions of the balde that could only do one type of damage of either longsword or shortsword but you may want to make the plus 2 only a plus 1
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Apr 13, 2020so a lightsaber