| Mod | Save | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| STR | 18 | +4 | +4 |
| DEX | 13 | +1 | +1 |
| CON | 20 | +5 | +5 |
| Mod | Save | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| INT | 7 | −2 | −2 |
| WIS | 9 | −1 | −1 |
| CHA | 7 | −2 | −2 |
Loathsome Limbs (4/Day). If the troll ends any turn Bloodied and took 15+ Slashing damage during that turn, one of the troll’s limbs is severed, falls into the troll’s space, and becomes a Troll Limb. The limb acts immediately after the troll’s turn. The troll has 1 Exhaustion level for each missing limb, and it grows replacement limbs the next time it regains Hit Points.
Regeneration. The troll regains 15 Hit Points at the start of each of its turns. If the troll takes Acid or Fire damage, this trait doesn’t function on the troll’s next turn. The troll dies only if it starts its turn with 0 Hit Points and doesn’t regenerate.
Multiattack. The troll makes three Rend attacks.
Rend. Melee Attack Roll: +7, reach 10 ft. Hit: 11 (2d6 + 4) Slashing damage.
Charge. The troll moves up to half its Speed straight toward an enemy it can see.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Nov 8, 2025I didn’t realize until I clicked the link that the troll limb is an independent monster that can (sometimes) turn into another troll! That is an incredible new feature and I love it!!
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 5, 2025I'm pretty sure there is more than one AI message in this comment section. See if you can spot it.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 21, 2025I bought the newer monster manual without knowing the ai art would be used. Please replace this ai art with real art made by real artists. Real art looks better, has more soul, and engages the player's imagination.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Dec 31, 2025That... that is real art... made by a real artist... did you even bother looking at it? I honestly can't even find any AI indicators. The closest thing I see is the foot in the stream, but that makes perfect sense in the composition. It even has layers that you can see when you compare the art in the physical book to the art in the digital version. The artist, John Tedrick, literally has this posted on his artstation. These completely unfounded accusations are incredibly harmful to artists like John. So next time you decide to go around accusing real art of being AI, maybe try doing 30 seconds of research, because thats literally all it took for me to find the artist.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Jan 1, 2026good god, that is a long chain. also, I see no A.I. in the picture, maby you just need glasses.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Feb 18, 2026The art is by John Tedrick, a human artist
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Apr 10, 2026would need a cow tail then
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Jul 9, 2026Listen I see what people are saying, but this may be AI, look at the left side of the picture, the foot is hella wierd, not only is it infused into roots like the tree behind it, but it is crazy disproportionate to the other leg, and the colors match completely, but look at the arm that also, on the left side turns into a tree, the other arm doesn't do that lol. This may be a "real dudes" art but he also could have AI crafted it and then completely edited it into his OWN work lol. People act like an artist can't use AI tools lol. Their is a random tree under the trolls legs that goes high and ends between the legs and then all the trees behind it go for days all the way up to the sky lol not to mention, the left most bird their is a random tree branch that comes up from the tale feather region, it's kinda wild. I'm all for DMs using AI tools if they want to create a monster for their players but that's a normal DM, we have lives, jobs, families, other shit to do. But if you have this in a book for purchase, that's kinda shameful.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Aug 15, 2026Everyone's talking about the power word kill interaction or claiming this is AI art, but nobody's talking about how by repeatedly chopping off and regenerating limbs trolls can rapidly create more trolls as (as someone else did point out) the creature it creates has a 1 in 12 chance to become a troll at the next dawn.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted Sep 11, 2026Necro but contrapositives are always logically equivalent to the original statement, and your example isn't a contrapositive. An inverse is swapping the order of the clauses of an if-then statement, a contrapositive is negating both clauses of the inverse of an if-then statement. Or, using your example:
Original Statement: If it is raining, then the ground must be wet.
Inverse: If the ground is wet, then it must be raining.
Contrapositive: If the ground isn't wet, then it isn't raining.
The original statement and contrapositive are logically equivalent to each other. In your example, you skipped the step of inverting the statement, leaving you with a statement that was not logically equivalent to the original.