Interesting, keep them imbalanced won. I've said this before. I wonder how many spellcasters, who've never played melee vote in these polls or respond to posts like "Spellcasters are more powerful than melee." LOL
i won't vote in the silly poll because none of the three options make any sense; while i'm not okay with how things are, i'm not here for damaging a different feat for no good reason, or thoughtlessly homogenizing them; i just want the GWF feat to be written with even a hair of real thought and basic arithmetic, which it does not appear to have been afforded
Not sure why you think they didn’t crunch the numbers in the first place. It’s not a huge buff, but it’s there, and on the weapons that least need a static increase to their inherent DPR. Seems like sound design, setting aside complaints that it’s not hyping up the weapon set that is already the most powerful into an even greater lead.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Interesting, keep them imbalanced won. I've said this before. I wonder how many spellcasters, who've never played melee vote in these polls or respond to posts like "Spellcasters are more powerful than melee." LOL
We are all in danger!
i voted keep them, but i also do not think they are imballanced at all
i won't vote in the silly poll because none of the three options make any sense; while i'm not okay with how things are, i'm not here for damaging a different feat for no good reason, or thoughtlessly homogenizing them; i just want the GWF feat to be written with even a hair of real thought and basic arithmetic, which it does not appear to have been afforded
Not sure why you think they didn’t crunch the numbers in the first place. It’s not a huge buff, but it’s there, and on the weapons that least need a static increase to their inherent DPR. Seems like sound design, setting aside complaints that it’s not hyping up the weapon set that is already the most powerful into an even greater lead.