Simply defined, a gish is a character that uses both swords and spells. I think originally they were specific to githyanki but the term is used to describe any fighter/mage character.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Your Friendly Neighborhood Community Manager (she/her) You can call me LT. :)
CM Hat On| CM Hat Off Generally active from 9am - 6pm CDT [GMT-5]. Thank you for your patience if you message me outside of those hours!
Simply defined, a gish is a character that uses both swords and spells. I think originally they were specific to githyanki but the term is used to describe any fighter/mage character.
Good examples are Eldritch Knight Fighters, Hexblade Warlock, Bladesinger Wizard, Valor/Sword Bards
Typically when you see people talking about gish builds here, it’s specifically a full caster who can be effective as a weapon user as well. As you might imagine, there’s a lot of criticism over the “effectiveness” of the weapon use, since as the number and level of spell slots grows the less desirable making a weapon attack looks.
Typically when you see people talking about gish builds here, it’s specifically a full caster who can be effective as a weapon user as well. As you might imagine, there’s a lot of criticism over the “effectiveness” of the weapon use, since as the number and level of spell slots grows the less desirable making a weapon attack looks.
yuuuup. Right now I'm playing a Bladesinger in a seafaring campaign, but with the character flavor that the person she was inspired by was also a bladesinger, but she only ever got to see the melee side of things, so when I take spells as I level, I try to think more tactically vs. damage dealing; spells that give me more mobility on the battlefield, stuff that keeps us safe on the water, etc., etc.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Your Friendly Neighborhood Community Manager (she/her) You can call me LT. :)
CM Hat On| CM Hat Off Generally active from 9am - 6pm CDT [GMT-5]. Thank you for your patience if you message me outside of those hours!
There are really (IMO) 3 different types of “GISH” : 1) the full caster - bladesinger, valor/sword bards and ( maybe) war cleric or moon Druid. These are casters who have some ability to survive in melee when they have to. 2) the partial casters - paladins, rangers, Eldritch knights, hexblades, arcane tricksters. These are all primarily physical combatants who get some measure of casting capability. They typically focus on melee or ranged combat with occasional spell use. The hexblade, arcane trickster and Eldritch knights have very limited spell use while the paladins and rangers have substantial ability. Paladins however tend to channel the majority of their ability into added damage on weapon attacks (smites) leaving the ranger as the more “ magically” oriented . 3) the multiclassing Gish - typically a multiclass with a partial caster and a full caster ( although plenty of fighter-casters are also built). Here you get the martial abilities from the partial caster and the major casting abilities from the full caster. Partial casters tend to dominate here as the caster levels they bring add to the levels of the full caster to make casting abilities somewhat stronger. Because spell damage tends to increase faster than martial damage both groups 1&3 tend to focus less on martial action as they progress. Shifting from martial with occasional spells at tier one to casting with occasional martial defensive actions at tier 4.
The term "Gish" goes all the way back to the Fiend Folio Githyanki of the early 1980s.
I'd personally love to have a full class built around a playstyle that weaves arcane magic into a heavy melee focus since it's such a popular concept. For me the paladin and ranger are not technically "gish" classes since they don't use arcane magic, but I know other people feel differently about that. 4E had the Swordmage to fill that arcane + melee desire, though I never owned any of the 4E products. 5E does have quite a few subclass options as Wi1dBi11 pointed out.
Due to the lack of massive forums etc, my D&D groups of old never ran into the term, and would instead call it "Gandalffing" since Gandalf used the Sword Glamdring along with his staff. Also after a while, every use of spellcraft and melee was called 'battlemaging', or "Swordsingering" if the weapon was a sword.
It was only in the mid half of 5E did i ever hear the word "Gish" in relation to D&D. There had been a term for it that i had just missed, for 3 decades.
So don't worry OP, you will never be as woefully ignorant as me.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
He/Him. Loooooooooong time Player. The Dark days of the THAC0 system are behind us.
"Hope is a fire that burns in us all If only an ember, awaiting your call To rise up in triumph should we all unite The spark for change is yours to ignite." Kalandra - The State of the World
I would note that a classic image that I have never seen successfully done in D&D is the guy who dual-wields a sword and an arcane focus, and uses them both to fight (think a spellsword in Skyrim).
I would note that a classic image that I have never seen successfully done in D&D is the guy who dual-wields a sword and an arcane focus, and uses them both to fight (think a spellsword in Skyrim).
I always assumed the 4E Swordmage was something like this. Not so?
The 4e Swordmage did a better job of it than the 5e classes and subclasses do - within the rules of 4e but the best examples were really the 1e elven fighter mages who leveled up in both classes into tier 3. By 3e the rules on that had changed but you could still multiclassing in both potentially into tier 5 (epic levels). I have a few of my 1e PCs that I played into 3e and epic levels as NPCs in my current world and you don’t want to mess with them.
The term "Gish" goes all the way back to the Fiend Folio Githyanki of the early 1980s.
I'd personally love to have a full class built around a playstyle that weaves arcane magic into a heavy melee focus since it's such a popular concept. For me the paladin and ranger are not technically "gish" classes since they don't use arcane magic, but I know other people feel differently about that. 4E had the Swordmage to fill that arcane + melee desire, though I never owned any of the 4E products. 5E does have quite a few subclass options as Wi1dBi11 pointed out.
I have the original fiend folio and the word Gish doesn't appear anywhere in it or to the Githyanki section.
Simply defined, a gish is a character that uses both swords and spells. I think originally they were specific to githyanki but the term is used to describe any fighter/mage character.
Heh, I'd always heard the term and knew the meaning, but I always assumed it was to do with 'gish gallop', used in the context of overwhelming opponents with everything from swords to spells at once. Never heard the Gith / Gish bit.
The term "Gish" goes all the way back to the Fiend Folio Githyanki of the early 1980s.
I'd personally love to have a full class built around a playstyle that weaves arcane magic into a heavy melee focus since it's such a popular concept. For me the paladin and ranger are not technically "gish" classes since they don't use arcane magic, but I know other people feel differently about that. 4E had the Swordmage to fill that arcane + melee desire, though I never owned any of the 4E products. 5E does have quite a few subclass options as Wi1dBi11 pointed out.
I have the original fiend folio and the word Gish doesn't appear anywhere in it or to the Githyanki section.
Simply defined, a gish is a character that uses both swords and spells. I think originally they were specific to githyanki but the term is used to describe any fighter/mage character.
Heh, I'd always heard the term and knew the meaning, but I always assumed it was to do with 'gish gallop', used in the context of overwhelming opponents with everything from swords to spells at once. Never heard the Gith / Gish bit.
See, this is the use of Gish i was familiar with, the Rhetorical technique.
I also had the fiend Folio back in the day, but was a 3rd hand copy, with a few of the pages missing, so i chalked that up to why i had never seen the term.
Edit: It has been pointed out that the term does appear by the person i quoted, and so it is all but confirmed that that i never saw the term because the version of the Folio i had was in such poor condition. ( Or i was a child and just never retained the word )
He/Him. Loooooooooong time Player. The Dark days of the THAC0 system are behind us.
"Hope is a fire that burns in us all If only an ember, awaiting your call To rise up in triumph should we all unite The spark for change is yours to ignite." Kalandra - The State of the World
The term "Gish" goes all the way back to the Fiend Folio Githyanki of the early 1980s.
I'd personally love to have a full class built around a playstyle that weaves arcane magic into a heavy melee focus since it's such a popular concept. For me the paladin and ranger are not technically "gish" classes since they don't use arcane magic, but I know other people feel differently about that. 4E had the Swordmage to fill that arcane + melee desire, though I never owned any of the 4E products. 5E does have quite a few subclass options as Wi1dBi11 pointed out.
I have the original fiend folio and the word Gish doesn't appear anywhere in it or to the Githyanki section.
The term "Gish" goes all the way back to the Fiend Folio Githyanki of the early 1980s.
I'd personally love to have a full class built around a playstyle that weaves arcane magic into a heavy melee focus since it's such a popular concept. For me the paladin and ranger are not technically "gish" classes since they don't use arcane magic, but I know other people feel differently about that. 4E had the Swordmage to fill that arcane + melee desire, though I never owned any of the 4E products. 5E does have quite a few subclass options as Wi1dBi11 pointed out.
I have the original fiend folio and the word Gish doesn't appear anywhere in it or to the Githyanki section.
Adventure from 1982 referring to 'Gish' named characters in the encounter table.
Thank you for defending my honor on this. xD
Now that we are getting a new psion class, hopefully WotC will revisit this full class concept next.
Meh; they’re unlikely to anything with it that’s markedly different from Bladesinger. The complaint about Gish options is that melee does not readily scale the way spellcasting does, and they can’t change that without making the Gish a better melee than the dedicated melee classes, which I really doubt they’re going to do.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
What is a "Gish" Never heard of it, except for Lillian Gish.
Simply defined, a gish is a character that uses both swords and spells. I think originally they were specific to githyanki but the term is used to describe any fighter/mage character.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Community Manager (she/her)
You can call me LT. :)
CM Hat On | CM Hat Off
Generally active from 9am - 6pm CDT [GMT-5].
Thank you for your patience if you message me outside of those hours!
Useful Links: Site Rules & Guidelines | D&D Educator Resources | Change Your Nickname | Submit a Support Ticket

Good examples are Eldritch Knight Fighters, Hexblade Warlock, Bladesinger Wizard, Valor/Sword Bards
Typically when you see people talking about gish builds here, it’s specifically a full caster who can be effective as a weapon user as well. As you might imagine, there’s a lot of criticism over the “effectiveness” of the weapon use, since as the number and level of spell slots grows the less desirable making a weapon attack looks.
yuuuup. Right now I'm playing a Bladesinger in a seafaring campaign, but with the character flavor that the person she was inspired by was also a bladesinger, but she only ever got to see the melee side of things, so when I take spells as I level, I try to think more tactically vs. damage dealing; spells that give me more mobility on the battlefield, stuff that keeps us safe on the water, etc., etc.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Community Manager (she/her)
You can call me LT. :)
CM Hat On | CM Hat Off
Generally active from 9am - 6pm CDT [GMT-5].
Thank you for your patience if you message me outside of those hours!
Useful Links: Site Rules & Guidelines | D&D Educator Resources | Change Your Nickname | Submit a Support Ticket

There are really (IMO) 3 different types of “GISH” :
1) the full caster - bladesinger, valor/sword bards and ( maybe) war cleric or moon Druid. These are casters who have some ability to survive in melee when they have to.
2) the partial casters - paladins, rangers, Eldritch knights, hexblades, arcane tricksters. These are all primarily physical combatants who get some measure of casting capability. They typically focus on melee or ranged combat with occasional spell use. The hexblade, arcane trickster and Eldritch knights have very limited spell use while the paladins and rangers have substantial ability. Paladins however tend to channel the majority of their ability into added damage on weapon attacks (smites) leaving the ranger as the more “ magically” oriented .
3) the multiclassing Gish - typically a multiclass with a partial caster and a full caster ( although plenty of fighter-casters are also built). Here you get the martial abilities from the partial caster and the major casting abilities from the full caster. Partial casters tend to dominate here as the caster levels they bring add to the levels of the full caster to make casting abilities somewhat stronger.
Because spell damage tends to increase faster than martial damage both groups 1&3 tend to focus less on martial action as they progress. Shifting from martial with occasional spells at tier one to casting with occasional martial defensive actions at tier 4.
Wisea$$ DM and Player since 1979.
Good question. I never heard of it used anywhere except in 5e. Maybe it originated from Baldur's Gate video game?
It’s a type of Gith monster block in 5e, at least. Githyanki Gish
Most likely the term has been around for a while- the Gith and a lot of their core concepts aren’t original to 5e.
The term "Gish" goes all the way back to the Fiend Folio Githyanki of the early 1980s.
I'd personally love to have a full class built around a playstyle that weaves arcane magic into a heavy melee focus since it's such a popular concept. For me the paladin and ranger are not technically "gish" classes since they don't use arcane magic, but I know other people feel differently about that. 4E had the Swordmage to fill that arcane + melee desire, though I never owned any of the 4E products. 5E does have quite a few subclass options as Wi1dBi11 pointed out.
Due to the lack of massive forums etc, my D&D groups of old never ran into the term, and would instead call it "Gandalffing" since Gandalf used the Sword Glamdring along with his staff.
Also after a while, every use of spellcraft and melee was called 'battlemaging', or "Swordsingering" if the weapon was a sword.
It was only in the mid half of 5E did i ever hear the word "Gish" in relation to D&D. There had been a term for it that i had just missed, for 3 decades.
So don't worry OP, you will never be as woefully ignorant as me.
He/Him. Loooooooooong time Player.
The Dark days of the THAC0 system are behind us.
"Hope is a fire that burns in us all If only an ember, awaiting your call
To rise up in triumph should we all unite
The spark for change is yours to ignite."
Kalandra - The State of the World
I would note that a classic image that I have never seen successfully done in D&D is the guy who dual-wields a sword and an arcane focus, and uses them both to fight (think a spellsword in Skyrim).
I always assumed the 4E Swordmage was something like this. Not so?
The 4e Swordmage did a better job of it than the 5e classes and subclasses do - within the rules of 4e but the best examples were really the 1e elven fighter mages who leveled up in both classes into tier 3. By 3e the rules on that had changed but you could still multiclassing in both potentially into tier 5 (epic levels). I have a few of my 1e PCs that I played into 3e and epic levels as NPCs in my current world and you don’t want to mess with them.
Wisea$$ DM and Player since 1979.
I have the original fiend folio and the word Gish doesn't appear anywhere in it or to the Githyanki section.
Heh, I'd always heard the term and knew the meaning, but I always assumed it was to do with 'gish gallop', used in the context of overwhelming opponents with everything from swords to spells at once. Never heard the Gith / Gish bit.
Apparently AD&D Fiend Folio (1981), p.43? https://rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/30829/what-is-the-etymology-of-the-term-gish/161711#161711
EDIT: Yep, page 43, in the listing of the lair of a Githyanki, it includes "2 'gish': fighter/magic-users of 4th/4th level"
Now I'm curious why they called it a Githyanki Gish so reading older and older articles.
https://media.wizards.com/2018/dnd/dragon/19/DRA19_Fedifensor.pdf
Adventure from 1982 referring to 'Gish' named characters in the encounter table.
See, this is the use of Gish i was familiar with, the Rhetorical technique.
I also had the fiend Folio back in the day, but was a 3rd hand copy, with a few of the pages missing, so i chalked that up to why i had never seen the term.
Edit: It has been pointed out that the term does appear by the person i quoted, and so it is all but confirmed that that i never saw the term because the version of the Folio i had was in such poor condition. ( Or i was a child and just never retained the word )
He/Him. Loooooooooong time Player.
The Dark days of the THAC0 system are behind us.
"Hope is a fire that burns in us all If only an ember, awaiting your call
To rise up in triumph should we all unite
The spark for change is yours to ignite."
Kalandra - The State of the World
Interesting side note: 'zerths' which is the same thing for Githzerai, never took hold.
Thank you for defending my honor on this. xD
Now that we are getting a new psion class, hopefully WotC will revisit this full class concept next.
Meh; they’re unlikely to anything with it that’s markedly different from Bladesinger. The complaint about Gish options is that melee does not readily scale the way spellcasting does, and they can’t change that without making the Gish a better melee than the dedicated melee classes, which I really doubt they’re going to do.