Is the person who enabled content sharing on the campaign over their limit?
Is there still someone in the campaign who actually owns the Humblewood book?
Are the player's licensing entitlements in sync as indicated here?
Are the licensing entitlements in sync for the person in the campaign who actually owns the Humblewood book?
Hi! Thank you for the response, it took a while for me to confirm all of this. It seems this is all good but now me and my friend who owns the Humblewood book is realizing there just might be a problem with his content sharing. Even though he has a bunch of sourcebooks, none of them are being shared even though content sharing is enabled, he is not past his limit, he has the membership, everything is synced, etc. So it might just be a DNDBeyond problem with something and not a problem with the Humblewood source :(
Just to clarify: the person who owns the books does not need to have a subscription to share them.
What you need to check on is the person who enabled content sharing in the campaign. This may be the DM or one of players (it says their username on the campaign screen). You need to make sure that person still has an active subscription and isn’t over the limit of five campaigns they can enable sharing for.
Is the person who enabled content sharing on the campaign over their limit?
Is there still someone in the campaign who actually owns the Humblewood book?
Are the player's licensing entitlements in sync as indicated here?
Are the licensing entitlements in sync for the person in the campaign who actually owns the Humblewood book?
Hi! Thank you for the response, it took a while for me to confirm all of this. It seems this is all good but now me and my friend who owns the Humblewood book is realizing there just might be a problem with his content sharing. Even though he has a bunch of sourcebooks, none of them are being shared even though content sharing is enabled, he is not past his limit, he has the membership, everything is synced, etc. So it might just be a DNDBeyond problem with something and not a problem with the Humblewood source :(
Just to clarify: the person who owns the books does not need to have a subscription to share them.
What you need to check on is the person who enabled content sharing in the campaign. This may be the DM or one of players (it says their username on the campaign screen). You need to make sure that person still has an active subscription and isn’t over the limit of five campaigns they can enable sharing for.
Ohhh I see, I am the DM and my subscription is good and I only have two campaigns I am content sharing for... but it still isnt working for some reason
So it’s been a year and a half and dndbeyond would rather develop subscriber seasonal content than fix known incompatibility issues with existing content that are so easy to code that it was spelled out for yall on the first page of these complaints over a year ago.
So it’s been a year and a half and dndbeyond would rather develop subscriber seasonal content than fix known incompatibility issues with existing content that are so easy to code that it was spelled out for yall on the first page of these complaints over a year ago.
Good job being vague enough that nobody actually can tell what issue(s) you're quite talking about.
The engine rework is still an in-progress project. Drops are being designed by a different team and the options are simply being set in place.
So it’s been a year and a half and dndbeyond would rather develop subscriber seasonal content than fix known incompatibility issues with existing content that are so easy to code that it was spelled out for yall on the first page of these complaints over a year ago.
Good job being vague enough that nobody actually can tell what issue(s) you're quite talking about.
The engine rework is still an in-progress project. Drops are being designed by a different team and the options are simply being set in place.
Well if you wanna use your rusty reading skills, you can tell that I said things brought up on page one. Which means they've bothered to fix NONE of ANYTHING brought up on page one. Not the invocation support, not the Feats, not the Magic items that are bugged, NOTHING.
So it’s been a year and a half and dndbeyond would rather develop subscriber seasonal content than fix known incompatibility issues with existing content that are so easy to code that it was spelled out for yall on the first page of these complaints over a year ago.
Good job being vague enough that nobody actually can tell what issue(s) you're quite talking about.
The engine rework is still an in-progress project. Drops are being designed by a different team and the options are simply being set in place.
Well if you wanna use your rusty reading skills, you can tell that I said things brought up on page one. Which means they've bothered to fix NONE of ANYTHING brought up on page one. Not the invocation support, not the Feats, not the Magic items that are bugged, NOTHING.
They deleted the stuff off of there that WAS fixed, you silly billy.
Also, it's not just a "click buttons & fix it" situation.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
DM, player & homebrewer(Current homebrew project is an unofficial conversion of SBURB/SGRUB from Homestuck into DND 5e)
Once made Maxwell's Silver Hammer come down upon Strahd's head to make sure he was dead.
Always study & sharpen philosophical razors. They save a lot of trouble.
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Just to clarify: the person who owns the books does not need to have a subscription to share them.
What you need to check on is the person who enabled content sharing in the campaign. This may be the DM or one of players (it says their username on the campaign screen). You need to make sure that person still has an active subscription and isn’t over the limit of five campaigns they can enable sharing for.
pronouns: he/she/they
Ohhh I see, I am the DM and my subscription is good and I only have two campaigns I am content sharing for... but it still isnt working for some reason
Still no ETA?
ETA on what exactly?
Find my D&D Beyond articles here
So it’s been a year and a half and dndbeyond would rather develop subscriber seasonal content than fix known incompatibility issues with existing content that are so easy to code that it was spelled out for yall on the first page of these complaints over a year ago.
Good job being vague enough that nobody actually can tell what issue(s) you're quite talking about.
The engine rework is still an in-progress project. Drops are being designed by a different team and the options are simply being set in place.
Well if you wanna use your rusty reading skills, you can tell that I said things brought up on page one. Which means they've bothered to fix NONE of ANYTHING brought up on page one. Not the invocation support, not the Feats, not the Magic items that are bugged, NOTHING.
They deleted the stuff off of there that WAS fixed, you silly billy.
Also, it's not just a "click buttons & fix it" situation.
DM, player & homebrewer(Current homebrew project is an unofficial conversion of SBURB/SGRUB from Homestuck into DND 5e)
Once made Maxwell's Silver Hammer come down upon Strahd's head to make sure he was dead.
Always study & sharpen philosophical razors. They save a lot of trouble.