TASHA’S CAULDRON of EVERYTHING - Issues and Support Thread

Quote from Athanar90 >>

Quote from Visimar >>

When I try to remove it, it crashes my DnD Beyond, and it disappears when I switch to other subclasses. I also made them with homebrews turned off, so it's something involving the subclass

You should set your sheet to Public and share the link so that can be seen if that's the case. The only spell of any level with "pyro" in the name is Pyrotechnics, when looking at all official and third-party sources on Beyond.

 made a brand new character for this thread, didn't add any spells besides what's given, and made sure Homebrew was turned off https://www.dndbeyond.com/characters/156926686

For some reason, even thought this book is supposedly usable with 2024 ruleset, the character creation options don't appear for me or my players in my campaigns. Do I have to also buy the 2024 players handbook or something?

Will add that the Tasha's "Optional Features" only work for 2014 versions of species or classes.

curious, why is the Martial Adept feat tagged as Legacy? As far as I'm aware, it hasn't been replaced by anything in 5.5e, so it shouldn't have that tag.

Quote from wagnarokkr >>

Quote from Fenrys87 >>

curious, why is the Martial Adept feat tagged as Legacy? As far as I'm aware, it hasn't been replaced by anything in 5.5e, so it shouldn't have that tag.

Because when the 5.5e core books came out, they put the Legacy tag on every feat and background from the 5e core books, regardless of whether it actually had an updated version or not. This doesn't make any sense, but we seem to be stuck with it for now.

(Martial Adept is not from Tasha's Cauldron of Everything. It's from the 2014 Player's Handbook.)

 ah, my mistake, don't know why I thought it was Tasha's

Quote from wagnarokkr >>

Quote from Fenrys87 >>

Quote from wagnarokkr >>

Quote from Fenrys87 >>

curious, why is the Martial Adept feat tagged as Legacy? As far as I'm aware, it hasn't been replaced by anything in 5.5e, so it shouldn't have that tag.

Because when the 5.5e core books came out, they put the Legacy tag on every feat and background from the 5e core books, regardless of whether it actually had an updated version or not. This doesn't make any sense, but we seem to be stuck with it for now.

(Martial Adept is not from Tasha's Cauldron of Everything. It's from the 2014 Player's Handbook.)

 ah, my mistake, don't know why I thought it was Tasha's

You were probably getting it mixed up with Fighting Initiate, which is from Tasha's, and which is trying to do a similar sort of thing — giving a less martial character a bit of martialness. Martial Adept does it by giving you Battle Master maneuvers, while Fighting Initiate does it by giving you a Fighting Style. 

I can never remember which is which either, I had to look it up to write this.

 probably, or Eldritch Adept due to the similar names

So.... five plus years later and the Genie Warlock is still not fixed? Is there ANY movement on this?

Quote from ShinyShipDnD >>

So.... five plus years later and the Genie Warlock is still not fixed? Is there ANY movement on this?

 
Yes. If you check the roadmap you'll see they're working on a remaking the platform - all the behind the scenes stuff - which will make it easier to make stuff work that previously couldn't. This means many unimplemented features being implemented. This was clarified in the AMAs with the Devs and D&D Beyond VP.

So I noticed today that the Amulet of the Devout changes your spell save DC but that isn't reflected in your channel divinity options snippet text (it shows the DC as the whatever it is unmodified by items). At least with the Oath of Noble Genies Paladin

Snippets don't actually take your spell save dc, it just calculates it (8 + prof bonus + sc ability mod). Anything that affects your spell save dc outside of changing prof bonus or your sc ability mod, won't affect the snippet.

Quote from Cyb3rM1nd >>

Snippets don't actually take your spell save dc, it just calculates it (8 + prof bonus + sc ability mod). Anything that affects your spell save dc outside of changing prof bonus or your sc ability mod, won't affect the snippet.

They really need to implement snippet codes for each casting class's attack mod and save DC since we can use modifiers in homebrew to alter them. It would be great for the class's snippets to finally show the correct values.

I agree, it would be good. Maybe the platform rebuild would allow something like that to be possible? 🤞

Thanks, D&D Beyond, for not implementing the optional Paladin features for the class from Tasha's. That the only freaking reason I bought the book! I'm done giving you fools any more money! Pathfinder, here I come!

Quote from Walkmaster2000 >>

Thanks, D&D Beyond, for not implementing the optional Paladin features for the class from Tasha's. That the only freaking reason I bought the book! I'm done giving you fools any more money! Pathfinder, here I come!

 They're implemented for the legacy Paladin class, which they were designed for.

Well, I  have ALL the ruleset options checked, including Legacy content, which I guess now includes 5e, which is the ruleset that my character was created in. So why can't I see or use the optional features? I own all the 2014, 2024, and every supplemental book for D&D since 2014.

Quote from Walkmaster2000 >>

Well, I  have ALL the ruleset options checked, including Legacy content, which I guess now includes 5e, which is the ruleset that my character was created in. So why can't I see or use the optional features? I own all the 2014, 2024, and every supplemental book for D&D since 2014.

You've presumably using the 5.5 version of the class. The Tasha's optional features are only for the 5.0 versions. When they made the new classes, they incorporated, made redundant, or chose not to include the features into the base classes.

Quote from PedanticPoet81664 >>

So Beyond just killed my ability to play a Clockwork Sorcerer because there is no UI support for Clockwork Sorcerers ability to swap spells.

 
Or just make a homebrew copy and change the spells? It's easy enough. This seems like a major overreaction to such a small thing. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

After 6 years, 7 of 22 known issues have been fixed. What are we paying monthly subscriptions for again?  That's just for subclass support.