One thing I need the most, is when I share my D&D Beyond content with a group, is to be able to select/sort which books to share. And not only rulebooks. It really need to be possible for the GM to un-share the campaign he is running, so the players cannot read it.
But for obvious reasons, not all campaigns you run are based on the same books. Often you have a group, where you are only allowed to use content from Players Handbook and Xanathars. So If I bought all the rulebooks, it really makes it hard to seperate what content is ok to use, and what is not.
So fix that, and do it on layer deeper. Every rulebook/adventure needs individual 3 options: Shared with all Shared with DM/GM only Blocked for all including DM/GM (to not have other rules mix in what he can see)
That way, the owner who shares, can agree with the DM on which content is avaliable for all or just DM, or noone.
granular content sharing is on the short-term roadmap. I don't know if they plan to provide all the options you laid out above, but they are responsive to feedback and will at least consider this possibility now that you have raised it.
I second this. Selective sharing of campaign books is a must.
I would love to share all the rules books released to date, but be able to restrict members of the campaign from seeing the adventure book that we're about to run.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
One thing I need the most, is when I share my D&D Beyond content with a group, is to be able to select/sort which books to share.
And not only rulebooks. It really need to be possible for the GM to un-share the campaign he is running, so the players cannot read it.
But for obvious reasons, not all campaigns you run are based on the same books. Often you have a group, where you are only allowed to use content from Players Handbook and Xanathars. So If I bought all the rulebooks, it really makes it hard to seperate what content is ok to use, and what is not.
So fix that, and do it on layer deeper. Every rulebook/adventure needs individual 3 options:
Shared with all
Shared with DM/GM only
Blocked for all including DM/GM (to not have other rules mix in what he can see)
That way, the owner who shares, can agree with the DM on which content is avaliable for all or just DM, or noone.
granular content sharing is on the short-term roadmap. I don't know if they plan to provide all the options you laid out above, but they are responsive to feedback and will at least consider this possibility now that you have raised it.
Trying to Decide if DDB is for you? A few helpful threads: A Buyer's Guide to DDB; What I/We Bought and Why; How some DMs use DDB; A Newer Thread on Using DDB to Play
Helpful threads on other topics: Homebrew FAQ by IamSposta; Accessing Content by ConalTheGreat;
Check your entitlements here. | Support Ticket LInk
I see it as a pretty logical thing to implement.
Especially, that a DM should not share the adventure with the players..
So instead of just one "share content" button. There ought to be a button for each book you bought, and option to share with dm only, or both.
I second this. Selective sharing of campaign books is a must.
I would love to share all the rules books released to date, but be able to restrict members of the campaign from seeing the adventure book that we're about to run.