Humblewood Tales - Bug and Support

Quote from MyTaintedSorrow >>

Quote from wagnarokkr >>

Other things to check would be:

• Is content sharing still enabled on the campaign?
• Is the person who enabled content sharing on the campaign over their limit?
• Is there still someone in the campaign who actually owns the Humblewood book?
• Are the player's licensing entitlements in sync as indicated here?
• Are the licensing entitlements in sync for the person in the campaign who actually owns the Humblewood book?

 
Hi!
Thank you for the response, it took a while for me to confirm all of this. It seems this is all good but now me and my friend who owns the Humblewood book is realizing there just might be a problem with his content sharing. Even though he has a bunch of sourcebooks, none of them are being shared even though content sharing is enabled, he is not past his limit, he has the membership, everything is synced, etc. So it might just be a DNDBeyond problem with something and not a  problem with the Humblewood source :(

Just to clarify: the person who owns the books does not need to have a subscription to share them.

What you need to check on is the person who enabled content sharing in the campaign. This may be the DM or one of players (it says their username on the campaign screen). You need to make sure that person still has an active subscription and isn’t over the limit of five campaigns they can enable sharing for.

Quote from wagnarokkr >>

Quote from MyTaintedSorrow >>

Quote from wagnarokkr >>

Other things to check would be:

• Is content sharing still enabled on the campaign?
• Is the person who enabled content sharing on the campaign over their limit?
• Is there still someone in the campaign who actually owns the Humblewood book?
• Are the player's licensing entitlements in sync as indicated here?
• Are the licensing entitlements in sync for the person in the campaign who actually owns the Humblewood book?

 
Hi!
Thank you for the response, it took a while for me to confirm all of this. It seems this is all good but now me and my friend who owns the Humblewood book is realizing there just might be a problem with his content sharing. Even though he has a bunch of sourcebooks, none of them are being shared even though content sharing is enabled, he is not past his limit, he has the membership, everything is synced, etc. So it might just be a DNDBeyond problem with something and not a  problem with the Humblewood source :(

Just to clarify: the person who owns the books does not need to have a subscription to share them.

What you need to check on is the person who enabled content sharing in the campaign. This may be the DM or one of players (it says their username on the campaign screen). You need to make sure that person still has an active subscription and isn’t over the limit of five campaigns they can enable sharing for.

 
Ohhh I see, I am the DM and my subscription is good and I only have two campaigns I am content sharing for... but it still isnt working for some reason 

Still no ETA?

Quote from ThyRium >>

Still no ETA?

 ETA on what exactly?

So it’s been a year and a half and dndbeyond would rather develop subscriber seasonal content than fix known incompatibility issues with existing content that are so easy to code that it was spelled out for yall on the first page of these complaints over a year ago.

Quote from aaronmauthe >>

So it’s been a year and a half and dndbeyond would rather develop subscriber seasonal content than fix known incompatibility issues with existing content that are so easy to code that it was spelled out for yall on the first page of these complaints over a year ago.

Good job being vague enough that nobody actually can tell what issue(s) you're quite talking about. 

The engine rework is still an in-progress project. Drops are being designed by a different team and the options are simply being set in place.

Quote from Athanar90 >>

Quote from aaronmauthe >>

So it’s been a year and a half and dndbeyond would rather develop subscriber seasonal content than fix known incompatibility issues with existing content that are so easy to code that it was spelled out for yall on the first page of these complaints over a year ago.

Good job being vague enough that nobody actually can tell what issue(s) you're quite talking about. 

The engine rework is still an in-progress project. Drops are being designed by a different team and the options are simply being set in place.

 Well if you wanna use your rusty reading skills, you can tell that I said things brought up on page one. Which means they've bothered to fix NONE of ANYTHING brought up on page one. Not the invocation support, not the Feats, not the Magic items that are bugged, NOTHING.

Quote from aaronmauthe >>

Quote from Athanar90 >>

Quote from aaronmauthe >>

So it’s been a year and a half and dndbeyond would rather develop subscriber seasonal content than fix known incompatibility issues with existing content that are so easy to code that it was spelled out for yall on the first page of these complaints over a year ago.

Good job being vague enough that nobody actually can tell what issue(s) you're quite talking about. 

The engine rework is still an in-progress project. Drops are being designed by a different team and the options are simply being set in place.

 Well if you wanna use your rusty reading skills, you can tell that I said things brought up on page one. Which means they've bothered to fix NONE of ANYTHING brought up on page one. Not the invocation support, not the Feats, not the Magic items that are bugged, NOTHING.

 They deleted the stuff off of there that WAS fixed, you silly billy.

Also, it's not just a "click buttons & fix it" situation.

It's been over a year and there is still no support help for this.

invocation support. i bought this book to get hexshredder for my 2024 warlock but it wasn't clear that i wouldnt be able to add the invocations because its a "legacy" invocation, even though i can add legacy subclasses.

So my problem, I'm making a warlock character. The hexshredder invocation does not appear in the invocation dropdown for class features. However, if I use my ASI and select the feat option, then select the eldritch adept feat, then hexshredder is in the list of available invocations.

My question, why do I have to use a feat to double up on a class feature to get access to this particular invocation? and is this something than could be easily fixed on the dev side by simply putting it in the right list?

Quote from DumbOrphan >>

So my problem, I'm making a warlock character. The hexshredder invocation does not appear in the invocation dropdown for class features. However, if I use my ASI and select the feat option, then select the eldritch adept feat, then hexshredder is in the list of available invocations.

My question, why do I have to use a feat to double up on a class feature to get access to this particular invocation? and is this something than could be easily fixed on the dev side by simply putting it in the right list?

 Because 5e invocations don't work w/5.5e characters unless reprinted.

This has been expressly stated as something that will be addressed by the various updates to the site coming over the next year.

yes. i am making a 2014 character, not a 5.5 character.  hence i asked the question and thought that i would let someone know.  i read this thread before posting, as is only courteous and appropriate. but, thanks for the assumption.

Quote from DumbOrphan >>

yes. i am making a 2014 character, not a 5.5 character.  hence i asked the question and thought that i would let someone know.  i read this thread before posting, as is only courteous and appropriate. but, thanks for the assumption.

 Hexshredder is also buggy in general.