So how do I get my money back for the new books? I won't be using this site or app, if there's no toggle for 2014 spells/magic items in the character sheets.
You're clearly not thinking about your players/customers AT ALL of you think this is a good idea.
Almost no one uses dndbeyond for the compendium, and having the 2014 versions of the spells etc. only in there and not being able to use them in the character sheets is a highway robbery. And someone mentioned that your solution for this is homebrew? Okay! So you're going to make using homebrew free now? Because last I checked you can only use it if you pay for a subscription! And I PAID for this shit ALREADY AND NOW YOU'RE TRYING TO MAKE ME PAY MORE? No thanks! I want my money back.
Can you say, explicitly and with no room for confusion, whether or not I can add a 2014 spell to my character sheet with these new rules? Will the 2024 version of a magic item be the only version that I can see on my sheet, meaning I would need to look through the 2014 compendium for the mechanics I would prefer to use, or will there be a Legacy/Current toggle that allows me to choose which version I add (and it just *defaults* to the current one)? Even if I have access to the old versions of the compendium, will I still need to follow the original advice of making a homebrew version just so I can add it to a character sheet (where I am much more likely to look it up)?
Having access to a game mechanic does not guarantee that you can actually use it the way you want to, and at this point I don't want any vagueness or points of ambiguity.
Using the character builder itself you will have no access to 2014 spells on new or existing characters. Old characters will have their spells replaced with the new versions whether you want them or not.
If you are willing to spend a lot of time with the homebrew tools it is possible to restore them in *some* cases. We have found (and continue to find) many cases where they cannot be restored. See post 429 for more detailed information.
I genuinely don’t care about anything other than accessing the content I choose to access on mine and my player’s character sheets.
I’ve been a loyal subscriber for years and taught our players on dndbeyond, but it isn’t worth it if I can’t use the content I’ve already paid for.
If I want to purchase and use 2024 content, I will when I’m ready. Make a stinking toggle option instead of assuming anyone wants these updates pushed upon them. I already spend enough time on game prep and researching in game to adjudicate rules - why should we also have to waste time add homebrew spells that ALREADY EXIST IN YOUR SITE or refer back to a search for this content? Just absolute idiocy and laziness.
Please just leave our character sheets alone unless we opt in to using your new rules. This is ridiculous, everyone is downloading their sheets rn because of this.
this is disappointing and frustrating. I don't want to swap rules mid campaign. I DM and play, so do I now need to spend HOURS homebrewing EVERY spell and magic item? That's not a constructive solution. some way to switch between would be better.
"Better" is subjective. This may make it "better" for you, but to those of us who are realizing that all the money we've spent and purchases we've made on DnD Beyond are about to go to waste because there is a new system and WOTC/DnD wants more of our money. That (let's be honest) we were probably going to give them anyway. This is a slap in the face, you can call it "better" because they are going us a flower afterwards but they still slapped us in the face.
How is it better for me? Something is better than nothing... objectively. You are not getting something where you previously were getting nothing. If something is not better than nothing, don't use the site at all. It's all the same to you.
I'm gonna break into your house and steal your TV, it's okay though, I'm leaving a free turd on your doorstep. This free turd is objectively better than nothing.
The more accurate analogy is stealing my broken, 10 year old television and leaving a brand new, $5,000 television behind. Which, yes, would be objectively better than nothing.
I think a better analogy would be WotC handing us a shit pie. when we got upset about the pie, they handed everyone a side of peanuts. You like the peanuts, good for you. However for those of us who have problems with peanuts, it doesn't improve the situation.
I think a better analogy would be WotC handing us a shit pie. when we got upset about the pie, they handed everyone a side of peanuts. You like the peanuts, good for you. However for those of us who have problems with peanuts, it doesn't improve the situation.
It is not a better analogy because yours deals with like/not like/preferences/and feelings. All of which are beyond the bounds of any of my discussions here. Don’t like it all you want.
I think a better analogy would be WotC handing us a shit pie. when we got upset about the pie, they handed everyone a side of peanuts. You like the peanuts, good for you. However for those of us who have problems with peanuts, it doesn't improve the situation.
It is not a better analogy because yours deals with like/not like/preferences/and feelings. All of which are beyond the bounds of any of my discussions here. Don’t like it all you want.
Please read my posts for what they are.
Please stop arguing just to continue to see your name appear in the comments. You aren't adding anything to the conversation other than continual confrontation. Just accept that people are not happy with this, that you are, and you won't be affected. But it does affect lots of other people. How is that so hard for you to understand?
I think a better analogy would be WotC handing us a shit pie. when we got upset about the pie, they handed everyone a side of peanuts. You like the peanuts, good for you. However for those of us who have problems with peanuts, it doesn't improve the situation.
It is not a better analogy because yours deals with like/not like/preferences/and feelings. All of which are beyond the bounds of any of my discussions here. Don’t like it all you want.
Please read my posts for what they are.
Please stop arguing just to continue to see your name appear in the comments. You aren't adding anything to the conversation other than continual confrontation. Just accept that people are not happy with this, that you are, and you won't be affected. But it does affect lots of other people. How is that so hard for you to understand?
This does nothing to address my post. I have been very clear on my position and others, yourself included, continue to invite me back to the conversation. If you don’t want me here, the least you can do is stop tagging me.
I am free to post my opinions here too though. This is not just a soundboard for rage. I have added to the conversation. It just is not a contribution that you value, which you are free to not approve of. If I wanted approval, I would be bullying, which seems to be very popular here.
My statement is only that the changes have cleared up a lot of confusion and put to bed a lot of anger, disappointment, and anxiety for some. Others don’t feel that way and that is completely valid too. I am not disputing or challenging the validity of feelings. I am disputing claims of fact that, in my observation, are incorrect.
Good afternoon, Sarah, and thank you for clarifying some things on the changes to the compendium.
As a longtime customer on D&DBeyond, and a frequent player of this game, I have been repeatedly disappointed in the lack of foresight with decisions made for this game, specifically for how it is handled on D&DBeyond. I was one of the few people who pre-ordered the Dragonlance: Shadow of the Dragon Queen digital and physical bundle, and was surprised to see a difference between my print Lunar Sorcery subclass and my digital Lunar Sorcery subclass, on the first day of pre-order access. This is but one example.
As a point of transparency, I cancelled my subscription to D&DBeyond when the OGL Debacle took place. I have not looked back since, as I realized the idiocy of spending my money on digital products and tools that I do not own and cannot control in any way. The course of action you are now taking regarding the 2024 rules is exactly the reason I stopped purchasing content here.
When you purchase a product on D&DBeyond, the product description always gave a description inclusion of something along the lines of "for use in the D&DBeyond Compendium and the D&DBeyond Character Creator". Now, I do not see that, as it has been removed. Regardless, that was a promise made to your customers that the content in those books, whether you decide to make a new version in a new book or not, would be usable in those tools.
The decision to essentially force those who still make use of your site to update certain things to your preferences or be forced to find a work around to use them with the tools they were promised they worked with in the first place, is exactly why people like me are stepping away from your tools and products entirely.
Please correct this mistake. This is but another step that will further the divide between your company and your customers. A simple solution to this is to offer the same free updates to people, but allow for 2014 versions to still be accessible in the character creator with a "Legacy" tag. Taking content away will never be the right decision.
We appreciate the level of transparency hat you are offering to the community at this time. Please appreciate the feedback being given, and take it into consideration, so a mistake is not made that further hurts the brand.
I think a better analogy would be WotC handing us a shit pie. when we got upset about the pie, they handed everyone a side of peanuts. You like the peanuts, good for you. However for those of us who have problems with peanuts, it doesn't improve the situation.
It is not a better analogy because yours deals with like/not like/preferences/and feelings. All of which are beyond the bounds of any of my discussions here. Don’t like it all you want.
Please read my posts for what they are.
Please stop arguing just to continue to see your name appear in the comments. You aren't adding anything to the conversation other than continual confrontation. Just accept that people are not happy with this, that you are, and you won't be affected. But it does affect lots of other people. How is that so hard for you to understand?
This does nothing to address my post. I have been very clear on my position and others, yourself included, continue to invite me back to the conversation. If you don’t want me here, the least you can do is stop tagging me.
I am free to post my opinions here too though. This is not just a soundboard for rage. I have added to the conversation. It just is not a contribution that you value, which you are free to not approve of. If I wanted approval, I would be bullying, which seems to be very popular here.
My statement is only that the changes have cleared up a lot of confusion and put to bed a lot of anger, disappointment, and anxiety for some. Others don’t feel that way and that is completely valid too. I am not disputing or challenging the validity of feelings. I am disputing claims of fact that, in my observation, are incorrect.
Dude, I accept that YOU are fine with the changes and that they won't affect you. I'm happy for you, truly. But you continue on and on dismissive of the FACT not opinion, that these changes negatively impact hundreds if not thousands of other players, and thus are not in fact good. A good change would be to update to the 2024 edition as planned, and have all of the changed spells and items flagged as Legacy, so that people that have not or choose not to use the 2024 edition rules can do so without interruption. That WOULD be in fact good. Can that be explained to you any better? Can you understand and accept that your thoughts on this are not the only acceptable ones?
So if someone showed up to your house took your ps5 and handed you a bag of poop is that better than if they just took it
If spells and magic items are the PS5 here, then it is more accurate to say that someone took my PS5 and left me a PS6. So, yes, that would be better. For this analogy to fully work though, we would have to say that when you bought the PS5, you agreed that Sony could come at any time and give you a PS6, or give you nothing at all. That is what you agreed to when you purchased spells and magic items here.
You may not like the PS6 and it may not work with your current TV without you buying an adapter or you doing some other workaround, but having a PS6 is better than them simply taking the PS5 and giving nothing at all, which is the extend of my argument here.
I think a better analogy would be WotC handing us a shit pie. when we got upset about the pie, they handed everyone a side of peanuts. You like the peanuts, good for you. However for those of us who have problems with peanuts, it doesn't improve the situation.
It is not a better analogy because yours deals with like/not like/preferences/and feelings. All of which are beyond the bounds of any of my discussions here. Don’t like it all you want.
Please read my posts for what they are.
Please stop arguing just to continue to see your name appear in the comments. You aren't adding anything to the conversation other than continual confrontation. Just accept that people are not happy with this, that you are, and you won't be affected. But it does affect lots of other people. How is that so hard for you to understand?
This does nothing to address my post. I have been very clear on my position and others, yourself included, continue to invite me back to the conversation. If you don’t want me here, the least you can do is stop tagging me.
I am free to post my opinions here too though. This is not just a soundboard for rage. I have added to the conversation. It just is not a contribution that you value, which you are free to not approve of. If I wanted approval, I would be bullying, which seems to be very popular here.
My statement is only that the changes have cleared up a lot of confusion and put to bed a lot of anger, disappointment, and anxiety for some. Others don’t feel that way and that is completely valid too. I am not disputing or challenging the validity of feelings. I am disputing claims of fact that, in my observation, are incorrect.
Dude, I accept that YOU are fine with the changes and that they won't affect you. I'm happy for you, truly. But you continue on and on dismissive of the FACT not opinion, that these changes negatively impact hundreds if not thousands of other players, and thus are not in fact good. A good change would be to update to the 2024 edition as planned, and have all of the changed spells and items flagged as Legacy, so that people that have not or choose not to use the 2024 edition rules can do so without interruption. That WOULD be in fact good. Can that be explained to you any better? Can you understand and accept that your thoughts on this are not the only acceptable ones?
I too accept that you are not happy with the changes, but here lies the problem: you have not identified how I feel about the changes because how I feel doesn’t matter to you and you have never asked… or read my posts where I stated how I feel.
The impact is being dismissed by me because it was never part of my argument. Impact or disruption to players os beyond the scope of my argument, which you would know if you were really trying to understand my position here. Good, not good, bad, terrible… these are all things that are separate from anything I have discussed.
I have repeatedly stated that yours and many others feelings are valid and acceptable. In fact, the very post you are responding to here states that. Did you read it?
For those arguing that the 2024 spells, etc are improvements - that may be - HOWEVER, I can think of no better way of getting the typical D&D Player to reject something than by forcing it upon them. WOTC emphasized that this new edition (what is it actually called? I've been using 2024 vs 2014, because that's easy to understand) would be "backwards compatible", but that means you can use your existing characters/campaign without change if you choose. D&D Beyond is saying that our existing characters/campaign will be changed without choice. That's compulsion - a 4-th level bard spell used against enemies. After spending hundreds of $$$$ on D&D Beyond, why do they now consider us an enemy to be controlled?
HOWEVER, I can think of no better way of getting the typical D&D Player to reject something than by forcing it upon them.
One of my best friends and roommates worked tech service phone lines for Apple during the whole "we just gave you all U2's Album for free!"
You'd never believe how many people called in furious over being given some music they didn't have to pay for, demanding to know how to delete it from their phones.
I don't think it's fair to call the guy a troll. He's just trying to defend his position when everyone's coming for him. That being said, he's already said if people stop tagging him he'd stop commenting so "not feeding" the guy is the obvious answer.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Grant K. Smith A+, Network+, MCP x 2, BSIT/VC, MIS
Software Engineer & Dungeon Master
"Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle and quick to anger." - J. R. R. Tolkien "Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup" - Anonymous
It seems much of the community is outraged by the published changelog for D&D Beyond regarding the implementation of the 2024 rules update.
I do not purport to know the architecture of the system or the costs associated with hosting it but I wanted to share a somewhat simple (to my mind) solution:
Host the current 2014 ruleset with all the currently existing content on a DDB Classic website. Give those who, for whatever reason, are against the rules updates the opportunity to move their purchases and subscriptions to the DDB Classic site, and then carry on with the updates to DDB and continue adding new content as it comes out. Perhaps down the road offer the ability to migrate to DDB from DDB Classic so those who want to update but "just not yet" have the ability to do so in due time.
Thanks in advance for your consideration and best wishes.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Grant K. Smith A+, Network+, MCP x 2, BSIT/VC, MIS
Software Engineer & Dungeon Master
"Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle and quick to anger." - J. R. R. Tolkien "Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup" - Anonymous
We understand that tensions are very high and you are well within your rights to be frustrated by the proposed changes here, but you are still obligated to follow the site rules and guidelines while posting in the forums. Any post that goes against these rules will be dealt with accordingly. This also includes reporting posts that you don't agree with, especially when they don't break our rules.
There is nothing wrong with having a difference of opinion. Some people are okay with these changes, and some are not, but calling other community members out of their names or other similar language because you disagree with them isn't going to be tolerated.
The community team thanks you all very much for sharing your opinions and feedback. We are continuing to collect that and pass it along.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Your Friendly Neighborhood Community Manager (she/her) You can call me LT. :)
CM Hat On| CM Hat Off Generally active from 9am - 6pm CDT [GMT-5]. Thank you for your patience if you message me outside of those hours!
So how do I get my money back for the new books? I won't be using this site or app, if there's no toggle for 2014 spells/magic items in the character sheets.
You're clearly not thinking about your players/customers AT ALL of you think this is a good idea.
Almost no one uses dndbeyond for the compendium, and having the 2014 versions of the spells etc. only in there and not being able to use them in the character sheets is a highway robbery. And someone mentioned that your solution for this is homebrew? Okay! So you're going to make using homebrew free now? Because last I checked you can only use it if you pay for a subscription! And I PAID for this shit ALREADY AND NOW YOU'RE TRYING TO MAKE ME PAY MORE? No thanks! I want my money back.
Using the character builder itself you will have no access to 2014 spells on new or existing characters. Old characters will have their spells replaced with the new versions whether you want them or not.
If you are willing to spend a lot of time with the homebrew tools it is possible to restore them in *some* cases. We have found (and continue to find) many cases where they cannot be restored. See post 429 for more detailed information.
https://www.dndbeyond.com/forums/d-d-beyond-general/news-announcements/204068-news-clarifications-on-the-2024-d-d-beyond?comment=429
I genuinely don’t care about anything other than accessing the content I choose to access on mine and my player’s character sheets.
I’ve been a loyal subscriber for years and taught our players on dndbeyond, but it isn’t worth it if I can’t use the content I’ve already paid for.
If I want to purchase and use 2024 content, I will when I’m ready. Make a stinking toggle option instead of assuming anyone wants these updates pushed upon them. I already spend enough time on game prep and researching in game to adjudicate rules - why should we also have to waste time add homebrew spells that ALREADY EXIST IN YOUR SITE or refer back to a search for this content? Just absolute idiocy and laziness.
Please just leave our character sheets alone unless we opt in to using your new rules. This is ridiculous, everyone is downloading their sheets rn because of this.
this is disappointing and frustrating. I don't want to swap rules mid campaign. I DM and play, so do I now need to spend HOURS homebrewing EVERY spell and magic item? That's not a constructive solution. some way to switch between would be better.
I think a better analogy would be WotC handing us a shit pie. when we got upset about the pie, they handed everyone a side of peanuts. You like the peanuts, good for you. However for those of us who have problems with peanuts, it doesn't improve the situation.
It is not a better analogy because yours deals with like/not like/preferences/and feelings. All of which are beyond the bounds of any of my discussions here. Don’t like it all you want.
Please read my posts for what they are.
DM mostly, Player occasionally | Session 0 form | He/Him/They/Them
EXTENDED SIGNATURE!
Doctor/Published Scholar/Science and Healthcare Advocate/Critter/Trekkie/Gandalf with a Glock
Try DDB free: Free Rules (2024), premade PCs, adventures, one shots, encounters, SC, homebrew, more
Answers: physical books, purchases, and subbing.
Check out my life-changing
Please stop arguing just to continue to see your name appear in the comments. You aren't adding anything to the conversation other than continual confrontation. Just accept that people are not happy with this, that you are, and you won't be affected. But it does affect lots of other people. How is that so hard for you to understand?
This does nothing to address my post. I have been very clear on my position and others, yourself included, continue to invite me back to the conversation. If you don’t want me here, the least you can do is stop tagging me.
I am free to post my opinions here too though. This is not just a soundboard for rage. I have added to the conversation. It just is not a contribution that you value, which you are free to not approve of. If I wanted approval, I would be bullying, which seems to be very popular here.
My statement is only that the changes have cleared up a lot of confusion and put to bed a lot of anger, disappointment, and anxiety for some. Others don’t feel that way and that is completely valid too. I am not disputing or challenging the validity of feelings. I am disputing claims of fact that, in my observation, are incorrect.
DM mostly, Player occasionally | Session 0 form | He/Him/They/Them
EXTENDED SIGNATURE!
Doctor/Published Scholar/Science and Healthcare Advocate/Critter/Trekkie/Gandalf with a Glock
Try DDB free: Free Rules (2024), premade PCs, adventures, one shots, encounters, SC, homebrew, more
Answers: physical books, purchases, and subbing.
Check out my life-changing
So if someone showed up to your house took your ps5 and handed you a bag of poop is that better than if they just took it
*Clears throat*
Good afternoon, Sarah, and thank you for clarifying some things on the changes to the compendium.
As a longtime customer on D&DBeyond, and a frequent player of this game, I have been repeatedly disappointed in the lack of foresight with decisions made for this game, specifically for how it is handled on D&DBeyond. I was one of the few people who pre-ordered the Dragonlance: Shadow of the Dragon Queen digital and physical bundle, and was surprised to see a difference between my print Lunar Sorcery subclass and my digital Lunar Sorcery subclass, on the first day of pre-order access. This is but one example.
As a point of transparency, I cancelled my subscription to D&DBeyond when the OGL Debacle took place. I have not looked back since, as I realized the idiocy of spending my money on digital products and tools that I do not own and cannot control in any way. The course of action you are now taking regarding the 2024 rules is exactly the reason I stopped purchasing content here.
When you purchase a product on D&DBeyond, the product description always gave a description inclusion of something along the lines of "for use in the D&DBeyond Compendium and the D&DBeyond Character Creator". Now, I do not see that, as it has been removed. Regardless, that was a promise made to your customers that the content in those books, whether you decide to make a new version in a new book or not, would be usable in those tools.
The decision to essentially force those who still make use of your site to update certain things to your preferences or be forced to find a work around to use them with the tools they were promised they worked with in the first place, is exactly why people like me are stepping away from your tools and products entirely.
Please correct this mistake. This is but another step that will further the divide between your company and your customers. A simple solution to this is to offer the same free updates to people, but allow for 2014 versions to still be accessible in the character creator with a "Legacy" tag. Taking content away will never be the right decision.
We appreciate the level of transparency hat you are offering to the community at this time. Please appreciate the feedback being given, and take it into consideration, so a mistake is not made that further hurts the brand.
Thank you,
Owlbear's Corner
Dude, I accept that YOU are fine with the changes and that they won't affect you. I'm happy for you, truly. But you continue on and on dismissive of the FACT not opinion, that these changes negatively impact hundreds if not thousands of other players, and thus are not in fact good. A good change would be to update to the 2024 edition as planned, and have all of the changed spells and items flagged as Legacy, so that people that have not or choose not to use the 2024 edition rules can do so without interruption. That WOULD be in fact good. Can that be explained to you any better? Can you understand and accept that your thoughts on this are not the only acceptable ones?
If spells and magic items are the PS5 here, then it is more accurate to say that someone took my PS5 and left me a PS6. So, yes, that would be better. For this analogy to fully work though, we would have to say that when you bought the PS5, you agreed that Sony could come at any time and give you a PS6, or give you nothing at all. That is what you agreed to when you purchased spells and magic items here.
You may not like the PS6 and it may not work with your current TV without you buying an adapter or you doing some other workaround, but having a PS6 is better than them simply taking the PS5 and giving nothing at all, which is the extend of my argument here.
DM mostly, Player occasionally | Session 0 form | He/Him/They/Them
EXTENDED SIGNATURE!
Doctor/Published Scholar/Science and Healthcare Advocate/Critter/Trekkie/Gandalf with a Glock
Try DDB free: Free Rules (2024), premade PCs, adventures, one shots, encounters, SC, homebrew, more
Answers: physical books, purchases, and subbing.
Check out my life-changing
I too accept that you are not happy with the changes, but here lies the problem: you have not identified how I feel about the changes because how I feel doesn’t matter to you and you have never asked… or read my posts where I stated how I feel.
The impact is being dismissed by me because it was never part of my argument. Impact or disruption to players os beyond the scope of my argument, which you would know if you were really trying to understand my position here. Good, not good, bad, terrible… these are all things that are separate from anything I have discussed.
I have repeatedly stated that yours and many others feelings are valid and acceptable. In fact, the very post you are responding to here states that. Did you read it?
DM mostly, Player occasionally | Session 0 form | He/Him/They/Them
EXTENDED SIGNATURE!
Doctor/Published Scholar/Science and Healthcare Advocate/Critter/Trekkie/Gandalf with a Glock
Try DDB free: Free Rules (2024), premade PCs, adventures, one shots, encounters, SC, homebrew, more
Answers: physical books, purchases, and subbing.
Check out my life-changing
For those arguing that the 2024 spells, etc are improvements - that may be - HOWEVER, I can think of no better way of getting the typical D&D Player to reject something than by forcing it upon them. WOTC emphasized that this new edition (what is it actually called? I've been using 2024 vs 2014, because that's easy to understand) would be "backwards compatible", but that means you can use your existing characters/campaign without change if you choose. D&D Beyond is saying that our existing characters/campaign will be changed without choice. That's compulsion - a 4-th level bard spell used against enemies. After spending hundreds of $$$$ on D&D Beyond, why do they now consider us an enemy to be controlled?
One of my best friends and roommates worked tech service phone lines for Apple during the whole "we just gave you all U2's Album for free!"
You'd never believe how many people called in furious over being given some music they didn't have to pay for, demanding to know how to delete it from their phones.
I'm fascinated to see what the next official post on this topic will include.
Cancelled my subscription earlier today. Been subbed for five years, with a full library.
I don't think it's fair to call the guy a troll. He's just trying to defend his position when everyone's coming for him. That being said, he's already said if people stop tagging him he'd stop commenting so "not feeding" the guy is the obvious answer.
Grant K. Smith
A+, Network+, MCP x 2, BSIT/VC, MIS
Software Engineer & Dungeon Master
"Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle and quick to anger." - J. R. R. Tolkien
"Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup" - Anonymous
It seems much of the community is outraged by the published changelog for D&D Beyond regarding the implementation of the 2024 rules update.
I do not purport to know the architecture of the system or the costs associated with hosting it but I wanted to share a somewhat simple (to my mind) solution:
Host the current 2014 ruleset with all the currently existing content on a DDB Classic website. Give those who, for whatever reason, are against the rules updates the opportunity to move their purchases and subscriptions to the DDB Classic site, and then carry on with the updates to DDB and continue adding new content as it comes out. Perhaps down the road offer the ability to migrate to DDB from DDB Classic so those who want to update but "just not yet" have the ability to do so in due time.
Thanks in advance for your consideration and best wishes.
Grant K. Smith
A+, Network+, MCP x 2, BSIT/VC, MIS
Software Engineer & Dungeon Master
"Do not meddle in the affairs of wizards, for they are subtle and quick to anger." - J. R. R. Tolkien
"Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup" - Anonymous
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
D&D StaffHey folks:
We understand that tensions are very high and you are well within your rights to be frustrated by the proposed changes here, but you are still obligated to follow the site rules and guidelines while posting in the forums. Any post that goes against these rules will be dealt with accordingly. This also includes reporting posts that you don't agree with, especially when they don't break our rules.
There is nothing wrong with having a difference of opinion. Some people are okay with these changes, and some are not, but calling other community members out of their names or other similar language because you disagree with them isn't going to be tolerated.
The community team thanks you all very much for sharing your opinions and feedback. We are continuing to collect that and pass it along.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Community Manager (she/her)
You can call me LT. :)
CM Hat On | CM Hat Off
Generally active from 9am - 6pm CDT [GMT-5].
Thank you for your patience if you message me outside of those hours!
Useful Links: Site Rules & Guidelines | D&D Educator Resources | Change Your Nickname | Submit a Support Ticket
