My wizard doesn’t live on Exandia, nor Toril, nor Eberron. My wizard doesn’t care that the Empire and the Dynasty are at odds. My DM doesn’t care if I use Galder’s Tower or Flock of Familiars. My DM should decide if my wizard may choose or scribe this new content. Making everyone jump through hoops to add homebrew feats is terrible design.
I love Critical Role. What Matt and everyone have designed for this book is great.
Based on what I have seen here Matt should just remove the spells from Caleb’s spellbook
The site functions as written in the books. The book states that these spells belong only to two Wizard subclasses and not the Wizard class itself (RAW), though a DM can choose to ignore that (homebrew).
Just gonna pitch the idea of a toggle in the character builder to enable it for all wizards, again! Seems like a good way to make everyone happy as, yeah... I hear what you guys are saying about RAW, but it feels a little bit like an expectation wasn't met, in how it was implemented.
I hear what you guys are saying about RAW, but it feels a little bit like an expectation wasn't met, in how it was implemented.
The exception was met exactly as described. The books says that DMs can make exceptions through homebrew, and you can make those same exceptions through homebrew on DDB.
I hear what you guys are saying about RAW, but it feels a little bit like an expectation wasn't met, in how it was implemented.
The exception was met exactly as described. The books says that DMs can make exceptions through homebrew, and you can make those same exceptions through homebrew on DDB.
If that was your expectation, then good, I am glad it was met! I just had a different one. I'm only sharing opinions, and making suggestions, trying to be helpful to the discussion <3
I hear what you guys are saying about RAW, but it feels a little bit like an expectation wasn't met, in how it was implemented.
The exception was met exactly as described. The books says that DMs can make exceptions through homebrew, and you can make those same exceptions through homebrew on DDB.
If that was your expectation, then good, I am glad it was met! I just had a different one. I'm only sharing opinions, and making suggestions, trying to be helpful to the discussion <3
I agree, my expectations where not met either. I don't even agree with the assertion of it being homebrew, but that is neither here nor there.
As an sside from that, has anyone figured out how to make a feat to add the spells to the list?
I hear what you guys are saying about RAW, but it feels a little bit like an expectation wasn't met, in how it was implemented.
The exception was met exactly as described. The books says that DMs can make exceptions through homebrew, and you can make those same exceptions through homebrew on DDB.
Yeah you keep posting this but clearly, by literally everyone else’s reaction, that’s not what’s wanted. It’s fine if D&Dbeyonds initial intent was to keep as close to the exact words of the book, but that clearly has been poorly received by the small audience that is here on the forum. How are people who don’t go here going to feel when they and their DM who they have agreed with to learn a dunamancy spell finds they can’t? It just doesn’t make sense for the site to make official content difficult to access. Make it available to all spellcasting classes and let DMs and players sort it out individually.
I hear what you guys are saying about RAW, but it feels a little bit like an expectation wasn't met, in how it was implemented.
The exception was met exactly as described. The books says that DMs can make exceptions through homebrew, and you can make those same exceptions through homebrew on DDB.
If that was your expectation, then good, I am glad it was met! I just had a different one. I'm only sharing opinions, and making suggestions, trying to be helpful to the discussion <3
I agree, my expectations where not met either. I don't even agree with the assertion of it being homebrew, but that is neither here nor there.
As an sside from that, has anyone figured out how to make a feat to add the spells to the list?
To my knowledge, it doesn't exist to add to the available spell list for them to later select from. The player would have to choose which spell(s) they want and you create a feat that grants them specifically.
Core Spawn Emissary is listed as Small, but it should be Medium.
Thanks for catching that! We have dispelled the enlarge/reduce spell that was cast on the core spawn emissary, so it should now be back to it's proper size!
I hear what you guys are saying about RAW, but it feels a little bit like an expectation wasn't met, in how it was implemented.
The exception was met exactly as described. The books says that DMs can make exceptions through homebrew, and you can make those same exceptions through homebrew on DDB.
If that was your expectation, then good, I am glad it was met! I just had a different one. I'm only sharing opinions, and making suggestions, trying to be helpful to the discussion <3
I agree, my expectations where not met either. I don't even agree with the assertion of it being homebrew, but that is neither here nor there.
As an sside from that, has anyone figured out how to make a feat to add the spells to the list?
To my knowledge, it doesn't exist to add to the available spell list for them to later select from. The player would have to choose which spell(s) they want and you create a feat that grants them specifically.
That is what I figured, I just don't understand why they list it as a possible solution if we can't do it?
I hear what you guys are saying about RAW, but it feels a little bit like an expectation wasn't met, in how it was implemented.
The exception was met exactly as described. The books says that DMs can make exceptions through homebrew, and you can make those same exceptions through homebrew on DDB.
If that was your expectation, then good, I am glad it was met! I just had a different one. I'm only sharing opinions, and making suggestions, trying to be helpful to the discussion <3
I agree, my expectations where not met either. I don't even agree with the assertion of it being homebrew, but that is neither here nor there.
As an sside from that, has anyone figured out how to make a feat to add the spells to the list?
To my knowledge, it doesn't exist to add to the available spell list for them to later select from. The player would have to choose which spell(s) they want and you create a feat that grants them specifically.
That is what I figured, I just don't understand why they list it as a possible solution if we can't do it?
You can add the spells to a feat like the following example:
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
How I'm posting based on text formatting: Mod Hat On - Mod Hat Off
I hear what you guys are saying about RAW, but it feels a little bit like an expectation wasn't met, in how it was implemented.
The exception was met exactly as described. The books says that DMs can make exceptions through homebrew, and you can make those same exceptions through homebrew on DDB.
If that was your expectation, then good, I am glad it was met! I just had a different one. I'm only sharing opinions, and making suggestions, trying to be helpful to the discussion <3
I agree, my expectations where not met either. I don't even agree with the assertion of it being homebrew, but that is neither here nor there.
As an sside from that, has anyone figured out how to make a feat to add the spells to the list?
To my knowledge, it doesn't exist to add to the available spell list for them to later select from. The player would have to choose which spell(s) they want and you create a feat that grants them specifically.
That is what I figured, I just don't understand why they list it as a possible solution if we can't do it?
You can add the spells to a feat like the following example:
I don't have the options below Additional Description, the only option I have below that is "Is Infinite" with a check box. See screenshot link below.
Swabian Basilisk is the same way, bolded Melee Weapon Attack in its actions.
Are you talking about the compendium versions specifically?
The standalone statblocks for the shadowghast and Swavain basilisk seem to be properly formatted... But I can confirm that I'm seeing "Melee Weapon Attack" in both both and italics (instead of just italics) in the compendium versions of both monsters:
i cant seem to add any dunamancy spells to my wizards spell list in the character sheet. i have critical role content on so idk why its not working
As noted in the first post, the spells are only available by default to the 2 wizard subclasses in the book (Chronurgy Magic and Gravity Magic). If you want to grant the spells to other characters besides those subclasses, you can use the homebrew system to do so (e.g. by creating a copy of the spell(s) and changing the spell list it's on, or via a homebrew feat), as long as you don't try to publish it publicly.
My wizard doesn’t live on Exandia, nor Toril, nor Eberron. My wizard doesn’t care that the Empire and the Dynasty are at odds. My DM doesn’t care if I use Galder’s Tower or Flock of Familiars. My DM should decide if my wizard may choose or scribe this new content. Making everyone jump through hoops to add homebrew feats is terrible design.
I love Critical Role. What Matt and everyone have designed for this book is great.
Based on what I have seen here Matt should just remove the spells from Caleb’s spellbook
The site functions as written in the books. The book states that these spells belong only to two Wizard subclasses and not the Wizard class itself (RAW), though a DM can choose to ignore that (homebrew).
But that's not true, otherwise only an elf could be a bladesinger or wield those elven blades from ebberon.
Also if it is your intent, then you shouldn't have the option to buy the spells separately, as that allows someone to buy content that is unusable within the ddb tool. And I don't think it's fair to say 'just homebrew it to make it work', there is nothing else that currently works like this
Yeah i hope they fix this just make it a spell that can be added ugggg
Ninja
Just gonna pitch the idea of a toggle in the character builder to enable it for all wizards, again! Seems like a good way to make everyone happy as, yeah... I hear what you guys are saying about RAW, but it feels a little bit like an expectation wasn't met, in how it was implemented.
Homebrew: Spells. Items.
Subclasses: Mythwalker (fighter).
The exception was met exactly as described. The books says that DMs can make exceptions through homebrew, and you can make those same exceptions through homebrew on DDB.
Find my D&D Beyond articles here
If that was your expectation, then good, I am glad it was met! I just had a different one. I'm only sharing opinions, and making suggestions, trying to be helpful to the discussion <3
Homebrew: Spells. Items.
Subclasses: Mythwalker (fighter).
I agree, my expectations where not met either. I don't even agree with the assertion of it being homebrew, but that is neither here nor there.
As an sside from that, has anyone figured out how to make a feat to add the spells to the list?
Yeah you keep posting this but clearly, by literally everyone else’s reaction, that’s not what’s wanted. It’s fine if D&Dbeyonds initial intent was to keep as close to the exact words of the book, but that clearly has been poorly received by the small audience that is here on the forum. How are people who don’t go here going to feel when they and their DM who they have agreed with to learn a dunamancy spell finds they can’t? It just doesn’t make sense for the site to make official content difficult to access. Make it available to all spellcasting classes and let DMs and players sort it out individually.
To my knowledge, it doesn't exist to add to the available spell list for them to later select from. The player would have to choose which spell(s) they want and you create a feat that grants them specifically.
My Homebrew Backgrounds | Feats | Magic Items | Monsters | Races | Subclasses
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
AlumniPlease don't argue in this channel.
This channel is for support problems only.
[ Site Rules & Guidelines ] - [ Homebrew Rules ] - [ D&D Beyond FAQ ] - [ Homebrew FAQ ] - [ Homebrew Video Tutorials ]
Standard "free" content is restricted to the D&D 5th Edition Basic Rules, SRD, and other free content.
Core Spawn Emissary is listed as Small, but it should be Medium.
Profile image Copyright Matthew Muzak, CGSociety.org
Thanks, Matt!
Thanks for catching that! We have dispelled the enlarge/reduce spell that was cast on the core spawn emissary, so it should now be back to it's proper size!
That is what I figured, I just don't understand why they list it as a possible solution if we can't do it?
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
ModeratorYou can add the spells to a feat like the following example:
Homebrew Rules || Homebrew FAQ || Snippet Codes || Tooltips
DDB Guides & FAQs, Class Guides, Character Builds, Game Guides, Useful Websites, and WOTC Resources
I don't have the options below Additional Description, the only option I have below that is "Is Infinite" with a check box. See screenshot link below.
Actions for Shadowghast are not formatted properly. Melee Weapon Attack is in bold, rather than in italics.
Profile image Copyright Matthew Muzak, CGSociety.org
Thanks, Matt!
Swabian Basilisk is the same way, bolded Melee Weapon Attack in its actions.
Profile image Copyright Matthew Muzak, CGSociety.org
Thanks, Matt!
i cant seem to add any dunamancy spells to my wizards spell list in the character sheet. i have critical role content on so idk why its not working
one time my character flirted with some towns folk while hiding in the illusion of a black dragon. "the dragon seduces you"
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
ModeratorAre you talking about the compendium versions specifically?
The standalone statblocks for the shadowghast and Swavain basilisk seem to be properly formatted... But I can confirm that I'm seeing "Melee Weapon Attack" in both both and italics (instead of just italics) in the compendium versions of both monsters:
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/egtw/wildemount-bestiary#Shadowghast
https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/egtw/wildemount-bestiary#SwavainBasilisk
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
ModeratorAs noted in the first post, the spells are only available by default to the 2 wizard subclasses in the book (Chronurgy Magic and Gravity Magic). If you want to grant the spells to other characters besides those subclasses, you can use the homebrew system to do so (e.g. by creating a copy of the spell(s) and changing the spell list it's on, or via a homebrew feat), as long as you don't try to publish it publicly.
The race and subclass options I bought on Dnd Beyond are not showing up in the character creator.
But that's not true, otherwise only an elf could be a bladesinger or wield those elven blades from ebberon.
Also if it is your intent, then you shouldn't have the option to buy the spells separately, as that allows someone to buy content that is unusable within the ddb tool. And I don't think it's fair to say 'just homebrew it to make it work', there is nothing else that currently works like this