But this one actually does. The druids in the 2014 PH, whether out of tradition or honest belief, elect not to wear metal armor. The DM is always free to adjust that for their own games, but the core book shouldn't make those assumptions. It needs to take a stand on some issues, and this was one of them.
Mostly agree except on who makes the choice. The player makes the choices for what their character chooses to do, thus this is a player choice.
The default assumption is that druids choose not to. But, your character, play em how you want. Make some counterintuitive choices, play against tropes, whatever floats your boat.
Eg. I had a stars druid who refused to wear anything other than chromed out polished steel to beter reflect the light. Not all druids are hippies.
It is apparently so hard to program Aberrant Mind and Clockwork Soul spell-swapping into dndbeyond they had to remake the game without it rather than implement it.
But this one actually does. The druids in the 2014 PH, whether out of tradition or honest belief, elect not to wear metal armor. The DM is always free to adjust that for their own games, but the core book shouldn't make those assumptions. It needs to take a stand on some issues, and this was one of them.
Mostly agree except on who makes the choice. The player makes the choices for what their character chooses to do, thus this is a player choice.
The default assumption is that druids choose not to. But, your character, play em how you want. Make some counterintuitive choices, play against tropes, whatever floats your boat.
Eg. I had a stars druid who refused to wear anything other than chromed out polished steel to beter reflect the light. Not all druids are hippies.
And this has been addressed ad nauseam.
The player makes an informed choice to abide by the druid's self-imposed restriction. If they want to deviate, then they should take it up with the DM. It isn't their decision to make unilaterally.
But this one actually does. The druids in the 2014 PH, whether out of tradition or honest belief, elect not to wear metal armor. The DM is always free to adjust that for their own games, but the core book shouldn't make those assumptions. It needs to take a stand on some issues, and this was one of them.
Mostly agree except on who makes the choice. The player makes the choices for what their character chooses to do, thus this is a player choice.
The default assumption is that druids choose not to. But, your character, play em how you want. Make some counterintuitive choices, play against tropes, whatever floats your boat.
Eg. I had a stars druid who refused to wear anything other than chromed out polished steel to beter reflect the light. Not all druids are hippies.
And this has been addressed ad nauseam.
The player makes an informed choice to abide by the druid's self-imposed restriction. If they want to deviate, then they should take it up with the DM. It isn't their decision to make unilaterally.
The DM isn't playing their character, they are. They make the choices for them. That's how this game works on the most basic fundamental level. Players control their character. DM controls literally everything else.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
I'm probably laughing.
It is apparently so hard to program Aberrant Mind and Clockwork Soul spell-swapping into dndbeyond they had to remake the game without it rather than implement it.
But this one actually does. The druids in the 2014 PH, whether out of tradition or honest belief, elect not to wear metal armor. The DM is always free to adjust that for their own games, but the core book shouldn't make those assumptions. It needs to take a stand on some issues, and this was one of them.
Mostly agree except on who makes the choice. The player makes the choices for what their character chooses to do, thus this is a player choice.
The default assumption is that druids choose not to. But, your character, play em how you want. Make some counterintuitive choices, play against tropes, whatever floats your boat.
Eg. I had a stars druid who refused to wear anything other than chromed out polished steel to beter reflect the light. Not all druids are hippies.
And this has been addressed ad nauseam.
The player makes an informed choice to abide by the druid's self-imposed restriction. If they want to deviate, then they should take it up with the DM. It isn't their decision to make unilaterally.
The DM isn't playing their character, they are. They make the choices for them. That's how this game works on the most basic fundamental level. Players control their character. DM controls literally everything else.
A player who chooses to play as a druid chooses to play by that restriction. They agree to it.
If they don't want to, they can play something else or talk with the DM about it. As you said, the DM controls everything else. Including what it means to be a druid. [REDACTED]
In a world like the forgotten realms a case can be made for a particular Druid to wear metal armor (probably cold worked copper, arsenical bronze or meteoric iron/steel as these would be found in native forms in the “natural” world. In a purely homebrewed world talk to the DM as their worldbuilding may have placed restrictions you need to abide by. Now yes even then you can choose to wear it but the the DM is free to tell you your spells fizzle and you can’t wildshape because your metal armor interferes with the flow of the magic needed to do these things..
The basic rule of D&D is the players decide there actions and the DM determines the consequences of those actions.
The rules state "druids will not wear armor or use shields made of metal" I agree it is an odd rule given that are willing to wield a weapon made of metal but the rule is there.
The DM had decide the ignore the rule, any movement away from RAW is a DM decision not a player decision (though they may consult with theplayers)
It is up to the DM to decide whether it is possible to make armor made up of materials such as bone and is so that the AC of it would be and any other features (e.g .imposing steath disadvantage or movement restrictions for low strength characters)
The player can say "while druids in the this world will not wear metal armor mine chooses to do so" but the DM decides the consequences of that. That can be that a druid that decides to wear metal armor loses all druid class features (possibly even permanently). As the DM has this right it is they that ultimately decide whether druids wearing metal armor is possible.
I'm glad that this fluff, is being changed to a rule in the new update.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Any time an unfathomably powerful entity sweeps in and offers godlike rewards in return for just a few teensy favors, it’s a scam. Unless it’s me. I’d never lie to you, reader dearest.
For those Druids playing with a DM who want to play the RAW, one option for is to find/buy medium (+1 - +3) dragon scale mail armor. Dragon scales are not metal.
Other magical items a Druid can use to improve their AC:
A +1 - +3 magical shield (bonus for the Sentinel Shield), which can be made of wood
I don't view an RP choice as a rule. If it was a rule, it would say a druid cannot wear metal armor. It doesn't say that.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Any time an unfathomably powerful entity sweeps in and offers godlike rewards in return for just a few teensy favors, it’s a scam. Unless it’s me. I’d never lie to you, reader dearest.
I don't view an RP choice as a rule. If it was a rule, it would say a druid cannot wear metal armor. It doesn't say that.
You can read the text either way. I perfect valid interpretation of "Druids will not wear armor or use shiled made of metal" is anyone willing to wear metal armor is not a druid.
"Druids cannot wear armor...made of metal " means if someone casts dominate person on a druid and tells them to put on a breastplate they would be physically unable to do so. "Druids will not wear armor...made of metal" means that could could put on the armor if under a dominate person spell becasue they would not be doing so willingly.
I don't agree. if the druid was somehow not allowed to wear metal armor, the proficiency would state "light armor and hide armor" as hide is the only form of medium armor that isn't metal (without getting exotic). it doesn't say that. It's proficient in wearing metal armor. It's proficient in metal armor, because part of becoming a druid was learning how to wear it. Now, RAI, I 100% agree with you. The intent is that druids do not wear metal armor. Adding an exception, of will not...that is a choice on the character's part. Not a rule. Particularly, since re-skinning is the name of the game.
OK, my druid doesn't identify as a druid, he identifies as a shaman. Now I get to wear metal armor because my title is not "druid", right?
The new rules fix this once they come out. No more medium armor, no more scimitars. Now it's a rule, not a choice, and that makes it ok in my eyes.
Any time an unfathomably powerful entity sweeps in and offers godlike rewards in return for just a few teensy favors, it’s a scam. Unless it’s me. I’d never lie to you, reader dearest.
I don't agree. if the druid was somehow not allowed to wear metal armor, the proficiency would state "light armor and hide armor" as hide is the only form of medium armor that isn't metal (without getting exotic). it doesn't say that. It's proficient in wearing metal armor. It's proficient in metal armor, because part of becoming a druid was learning how to wear it. Now, RAI, I 100% agree with you. The intent is that druids do not wear metal armor. Adding an exception, of will not...that is a choice on the character's part. Not a rule. Particularly, since re-skinning is the name of the game.
OK, my druid doesn't identify as a druid, he identifies as a shaman. Now I get to wear metal armor because my title is not "druid", right?
The new rules fix this once they come out. No more medium armor, no more scimitars. Now it's a rule, not a choice, and that makes it ok in my eyes.
I don't agree. if the druid was somehow not allowed to wear metal armor, the proficiency would state "light armor and hide armor" as hide is the only form of medium armor that isn't metal (without getting exotic).
Why not "get exotic", I have always thought one of the main reason dragon scale mail was put into the game was to provide a way in which the DM could provide a druid with an upgrade tp armor when they get into higher tiers.
I haven't played D&D long enough to know if it was an issue with earlier editions but I can see why WOTC seem to be about to move away frm the current rules because a lot of players want their druids to do something druids "will not" do.
I don't agree. if the druid was somehow not allowed to wear metal armor, the proficiency would state "light armor and hide armor" as hide is the only form of medium armor that isn't metal (without getting exotic). it doesn't say that. It's proficient in wearing metal armor. It's proficient in metal armor, because part of becoming a druid was learning how to wear it. Now, RAI, I 100% agree with you. The intent is that druids do not wear metal armor. Adding an exception, of will not...that is a choice on the character's part. Not a rule. Particularly, since re-skinning is the name of the game.
OK, my druid doesn't identify as a druid, he identifies as a shaman. Now I get to wear metal armor because my title is not "druid", right?
The new rules fix this once they come out. No more medium armor, no more scimitars. Now it's a rule, not a choice, and that makes it ok in my eyes.
The druid, as of 2014, is proficient with armors which can be made of metal but do not have to be. What you consider flavor text is a perfect example of future-proofing. Exotic materials can and do exist for armors both magical and mundane. We've gone over this, too, and there's nothing stopping a DM from inventing even more of their own.
It doesn't matter if the rule is externally imposed (this is their proficiency) or self-imposed (this is their choice and part of their identity). The rule still exists. Players of paladins still agree to the terms of their chosen Sacred Oath, do they not? Or do they get to ignore that because it's honestly just flavor and only the mechanics matter?
Any time an unfathomably powerful entity sweeps in and offers godlike rewards in return for just a few teensy favors, it’s a scam. Unless it’s me. I’d never lie to you, reader dearest.
No. It's not a rule. A rule is set in stone. Won't is a choice.
My shaman does not identify as a druid. Therefore the restriction does not apply for RP reasons.
Exactly right!
Some rules will tell you you CAN'T do something. Some will tell you that you CAN do something.
And there is a third type of rule that is if you do something there is a consequence for it.
We can even see that plain as day with armor rules. Anyone can wear it. But if you choose to wear armor that you don't have proficiency for, well, you suffer the specific listed consequence for that.
Without a consequence it isn't enforceable. Because it is a text blurb about preference. And that's it. That's called flavor text.
If it had been a rule, there would be a consequence for doing it.
Because I assure you if I'm a stars druid, or even a wildfire druid, I'm going to buy and then don some breastplate armor. There is nothing reasonable stopping that from happening.
So then what? Because that choice was always outside the DM's control. I the player choose the characters action and I say he equips it.
So then what? Again... the book is silent because it is not a rule. It is unenforceable.
edit: The irony is that my own game's druids are rarely ever caught in metal armor. Because the different druidic circles are ferociously territorial and hunt each other. And they all have the heat metal on their class list. So it is just a common sense thing.
It is apparently so hard to program Aberrant Mind and Clockwork Soul spell-swapping into dndbeyond they had to remake the game without it rather than implement it.
Since this thread is still going another thought occurred to me: maybe the designers didn't want players to go out and custom make polar bear sized plate barding (it only costs 6,000 gold), then put it on their druid after they wildshape into a polar bear. Or giant scorpion or whatever. Because that is golden compass territory :D
The answer is yes. You will have the same effects (higher AC), but you’ll have disadvantage on stealth and athletics checks.
DM: “Who’s your patron?”
Warlock: “Ummm”
DM: “Hurry Up”
Warlock: “yOu”
*All other players look at each other with utter fear*
__________________________________________________________________________________
Check out my homebrew: My Homebrew
Mostly agree except on who makes the choice. The player makes the choices for what their character chooses to do, thus this is a player choice.
The default assumption is that druids choose not to. But, your character, play em how you want. Make some counterintuitive choices, play against tropes, whatever floats your boat.
Eg. I had a stars druid who refused to wear anything other than chromed out polished steel to beter reflect the light. Not all druids are hippies.
I'm probably laughing.
It is apparently so hard to program Aberrant Mind and Clockwork Soul spell-swapping into dndbeyond they had to remake the game without it rather than implement it.
And this has been addressed ad nauseam.
The player makes an informed choice to abide by the druid's self-imposed restriction. If they want to deviate, then they should take it up with the DM. It isn't their decision to make unilaterally.
The DM isn't playing their character, they are. They make the choices for them. That's how this game works on the most basic fundamental level. Players control their character. DM controls literally everything else.
I'm probably laughing.
It is apparently so hard to program Aberrant Mind and Clockwork Soul spell-swapping into dndbeyond they had to remake the game without it rather than implement it.
A player who chooses to play as a druid chooses to play by that restriction. They agree to it.
If they don't want to, they can play something else or talk with the DM about it. As you said, the DM controls everything else. Including what it means to be a druid. [REDACTED]
In a world like the forgotten realms a case can be made for a particular Druid to wear metal armor (probably cold worked copper, arsenical bronze or meteoric iron/steel as these would be found in native forms in the “natural” world. In a purely homebrewed world talk to the DM as their worldbuilding may have placed restrictions you need to abide by. Now yes even then you can choose to wear it but the the DM is free to tell you your spells fizzle and you can’t wildshape because your metal armor interferes with the flow of the magic needed to do these things..
Wisea$$ DM and Player since 1979.
The basic rule of D&D is the players decide there actions and the DM determines the consequences of those actions.
The rules state "druids will not wear armor or use shields made of metal" I agree it is an odd rule given that are willing to wield a weapon made of metal but the rule is there.
I'm glad that this fluff, is being changed to a rule in the new update.
Any time an unfathomably powerful entity sweeps in and offers godlike rewards in return for just a few teensy favors, it’s a scam. Unless it’s me. I’d never lie to you, reader dearest.
Tasha
Wow! A thing I actually like about one d&d, for once. I'm kind of amazed. Nice!
For those Druids playing with a DM who want to play the RAW, one option for is to find/buy medium (+1 - +3) dragon scale mail armor. Dragon scales are not metal.
Other magical items a Druid can use to improve their AC:
Started playing AD&D in the late 70s and stopped in the mid-80s. Started immersing myself into 5e in 2023
I don't view an RP choice as a rule. If it was a rule, it would say a druid cannot wear metal armor. It doesn't say that.
Any time an unfathomably powerful entity sweeps in and offers godlike rewards in return for just a few teensy favors, it’s a scam. Unless it’s me. I’d never lie to you, reader dearest.
Tasha
You can read the text either way. I perfect valid interpretation of "Druids will not wear armor or use shiled made of metal" is anyone willing to wear metal armor is not a druid.
"Druids cannot wear armor...made of metal " means if someone casts dominate person on a druid and tells them to put on a breastplate they would be physically unable to do so. "Druids will not wear armor...made of metal" means that could could put on the armor if under a dominate person spell becasue they would not be doing so willingly.
I don't agree. if the druid was somehow not allowed to wear metal armor, the proficiency would state "light armor and hide armor" as hide is the only form of medium armor that isn't metal (without getting exotic). it doesn't say that. It's proficient in wearing metal armor. It's proficient in metal armor, because part of becoming a druid was learning how to wear it. Now, RAI, I 100% agree with you. The intent is that druids do not wear metal armor. Adding an exception, of will not...that is a choice on the character's part. Not a rule. Particularly, since re-skinning is the name of the game.
OK, my druid doesn't identify as a druid, he identifies as a shaman. Now I get to wear metal armor because my title is not "druid", right?
The new rules fix this once they come out. No more medium armor, no more scimitars. Now it's a rule, not a choice, and that makes it ok in my eyes.
PROFICIENCIES
Saving Throws: Intelligence, Wisdom
Skills (Choose 2): Arcana, Animal Handling, Insight,
Medicine, Nature, Perception, Religion, Survival
Weapons: Simple Weapons
Tools: Herbalism Kit
ARMOR TRAINING
Light Armor, Shields
Any time an unfathomably powerful entity sweeps in and offers godlike rewards in return for just a few teensy favors, it’s a scam. Unless it’s me. I’d never lie to you, reader dearest.
Tasha
Why not "get exotic", I have always thought one of the main reason dragon scale mail was put into the game was to provide a way in which the DM could provide a druid with an upgrade tp armor when they get into higher tiers.
I haven't played D&D long enough to know if it was an issue with earlier editions but I can see why WOTC seem to be about to move away frm the current rules because a lot of players want their druids to do something druids "will not" do.
The druid, as of 2014, is proficient with armors which can be made of metal but do not have to be. What you consider flavor text is a perfect example of future-proofing. Exotic materials can and do exist for armors both magical and mundane. We've gone over this, too, and there's nothing stopping a DM from inventing even more of their own.
It doesn't matter if the rule is externally imposed (this is their proficiency) or self-imposed (this is their choice and part of their identity). The rule still exists. Players of paladins still agree to the terms of their chosen Sacred Oath, do they not? Or do they get to ignore that because it's honestly just flavor and only the mechanics matter?
Consent is king, and it's informed.
No. It's not a rule. A rule is set in stone. Won't is a choice.
My shaman does not identify as a druid. Therefore the restriction does not apply for RP reasons.
Any time an unfathomably powerful entity sweeps in and offers godlike rewards in return for just a few teensy favors, it’s a scam. Unless it’s me. I’d never lie to you, reader dearest.
Tasha
Exactly right!
Some rules will tell you you CAN'T do something. Some will tell you that you CAN do something.
And there is a third type of rule that is if you do something there is a consequence for it.
We can even see that plain as day with armor rules. Anyone can wear it. But if you choose to wear armor that you don't have proficiency for, well, you suffer the specific listed consequence for that.
Without a consequence it isn't enforceable. Because it is a text blurb about preference. And that's it. That's called flavor text.
If it had been a rule, there would be a consequence for doing it.
Because I assure you if I'm a stars druid, or even a wildfire druid, I'm going to buy and then don some breastplate armor. There is nothing reasonable stopping that from happening.
So then what? Because that choice was always outside the DM's control. I the player choose the characters action and I say he equips it.
So then what? Again... the book is silent because it is not a rule. It is unenforceable.
edit: The irony is that my own game's druids are rarely ever caught in metal armor. Because the different druidic circles are ferociously territorial and hunt each other. And they all have the heat metal on their class list. So it is just a common sense thing.
I'm probably laughing.
It is apparently so hard to program Aberrant Mind and Clockwork Soul spell-swapping into dndbeyond they had to remake the game without it rather than implement it.
And if the DM says the breastplate isn't legal? Then what?
You all keep acting like the only consequences are mechanical and spelled out in the rules. You're ignoring the social contract.
It is absolutely enforceable. Plenty of things with no defined game mechanics remain enforceable.
Since this thread is still going another thought occurred to me: maybe the designers didn't want players to go out and custom make polar bear sized plate barding (it only costs 6,000 gold), then put it on their druid after they wildshape into a polar bear. Or giant scorpion or whatever. Because that is golden compass territory :D