I've had an ongoing temptation to make it so enemy threatened area counts as difficult terrain, which you can ignore at the cost of drawing an opportunity attack.
I've had an ongoing temptation to make it so enemy threatened area counts as difficult terrain, which you can ignore at the cost of drawing an opportunity attack.
Ooh that sounds tactically interesting.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
WOTC lies. We know that WOTC lies. WOTC knows that we know that WOTC lies. We know that WOTC knows that we know that WOTC lies. And still they lie.
Because of the above (a paraphrase from Orwell) I no longer post to the forums -- PM me if you need help or anything.
I've had an ongoing temptation to make it so enemy threatened area counts as difficult terrain, which you can ignore at the cost of drawing an opportunity attack.
Ooh that sounds tactically interesting.
It's not really a big difference (at most it adds 15' movement to run past someone) but it does make it more practical for a front line to defend a back line without having large amounts of space between the lines.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I've had an ongoing temptation to make it so enemy threatened area counts as difficult terrain, which you can ignore at the cost of drawing an opportunity attack.
Ooh that sounds tactically interesting.
WOTC lies. We know that WOTC lies. WOTC knows that we know that WOTC lies. We know that WOTC knows that we know that WOTC lies. And still they lie.
Because of the above (a paraphrase from Orwell) I no longer post to the forums -- PM me if you need help or anything.
It's not really a big difference (at most it adds 15' movement to run past someone) but it does make it more practical for a front line to defend a back line without having large amounts of space between the lines.