Would you say that when it says you "gain the ammount you bet plus half again more or double the amount you bet" in that gain it includes the money you had bet?
For example, if you bet 50gp and you get two successes do you get back the 50gp plus another 75gp or you get 50gp plus another 25 gp.
For me it's quite important to apply this rule as RAW, as I want to be unbias with the players when balancing gambling, as they will use it rutinely to make money in this campaign due to their characters strenghts.
Would you say that when it says you "gain the ammount you bet plus half again more or double the amount you bet" in that gain it includes the money you had bet?
For example, if you bet 50gp and you get two successes do you get back the 50gp plus another 75gp or you get 50gp plus another 25 gp.
Sanvael is correct gaining the ammount you bet means it includes the money you had bet. So if you get two success in gambling on a 50 gp bet, you gain 25 and get 75 gp total. It's basically
At 0 success you loose your bet and accrue a debt equal to it, so, if you are right, it would be something like this, wich is why I'm not 100% sure about the interpretation.
0 success = - 200% (loose total + debt equal to total)
1 success = -50% (loose half)
2 success = +50% (gain half)
3 success = +100% (gain total)
Still the other one would be these, wich I dislike as it would make gambling quite reliable.
0 success = - 200% (loose total + debt equal to total)
0 success means you lose all the money you bet, and accrue a debt equal to that amount equal - 100%, not - 200%. You cannot win or loose more than you bet basically. So if you bet 50 gp that way, you loose all 50 gp and become poorer of such ammount basically.
0 success means you lose all the money you bet, and accrue a debt equal to that amount equal - 100%, not - 200%. You cannot win or loose more than you bet basically. So if you bet 50 gp that way, you loose all 50 gp and become poorer of such ammount basically.
Yea but the "equal" refers to the money you bet which it says you also lose. I can't see any way that sentence doesn't mean you lost the initial 50gp plus another 50gp for a total of 100gp. Might seems harsh but it's very thematic IMO.
0 success means you lose all the money you bet, and accrue a debt equal to that amount equal - 100%, not - 200%. You cannot win or loose more than you bet basically. So if you bet 50 gp that way, you loose all 50 gp and become poorer of such ammount basically.
Yea but the "equal" refers to the money you bet which it says you also lose. I can't see any way that sentence doesn't mean you lost the initial 50gp plus another 50gp for a total of 100gp. Might seems harsh but it's very thematic IMO.
Ok then If that is the intended way it would mean this:
0 success = - 200% (recuperate nothing and pay as much as your stake)
I get where you’re coming from, but I think the wording here is intentionally focused on balancing risk and consequence. The "equal" part refers to the amount you lose being the same as your bet. So if you bet 50 gp and get 0 successes, you lose the 50 gp you bet, and then you're in debt for an additional 50 gp (so 100 gp total, including the debt). It adds a lot of tension and stakes to the game, which feels very fitting for this kind of setting. If we step away from the D&D setting and look at similar luck-based games, things can be a bit simpler. For example, here https://bonustwist.com/casino-bonuses/50-free-spins-no-deposit/ you can find reviews of online casinos that offers 50 no deposit free spins, where you get the bonus without risking anything. These types of bonuses are perfect for newcomers who want to test the casino experience before committing to a deposit. It’s an interesting contrast to the harsh consequences of D&D-style gambling. These types of systems highlight how varying approaches to risk and reward can cater to different player experiences and preferences. It’s fascinating to see how such contrasts influence player engagement and strategy.
Givent the gambling table provided by xanathar.
Would you say that when it says you "gain the ammount you bet plus half again more or double the amount you bet" in that gain it includes the money you had bet?
For example, if you bet 50gp and you get two successes do you get back the 50gp plus another 75gp or you get 50gp plus another 25 gp.
For me it's quite important to apply this rule as RAW, as I want to be unbias with the players when balancing gambling, as they will use it rutinely to make money in this campaign due to their characters strenghts.
I would say that it does include the amount you bet. The first two categories - 0 successes and 1 success - indicate that you lose the money you bet.
The maximum amount you can make is therefore 100% of the initial bet, on 3 successes (doubling your initial stake).
Sanvael is correct gaining the ammount you bet means it includes the money you had bet. So if you get two success in gambling on a 50 gp bet, you gain 25 and get 75 gp total. It's basically
At 0 success you loose your bet and accrue a debt equal to it, so, if you are right, it would be something like this, wich is why I'm not 100% sure about the interpretation.
0 success = - 200% (loose total + debt equal to total)
1 success = -50% (loose half)
2 success = +50% (gain half)
3 success = +100% (gain total)
Still the other one would be these, wich I dislike as it would make gambling quite reliable.
0 success = - 200% (loose total + debt equal to total)
1 success = -50% (loose half)
2 success = +150% (gain bet + half)
3 success = +200% (gain 2x total)
0 success means you lose all the money you bet, and accrue a debt equal to that amount equal - 100%, not - 200%. You cannot win or loose more than you bet basically. So if you bet 50 gp that way, you loose all 50 gp and become poorer of such ammount basically.
Yea but the "equal" refers to the money you bet which it says you also lose. I can't see any way that sentence doesn't mean you lost the initial 50gp plus another 50gp for a total of 100gp. Might seems harsh but it's very thematic IMO.
Ok then If that is the intended way it would mean this:
0 success = - 200% (recuperate nothing and pay as much as your stake)
1 success = -50% (recuperate half your stake)
2 success = +150% (recuperate stake + 1/2 stake)
3 success = +200% (recuperate stake + stake)
I get where you’re coming from, but I think the wording here is intentionally focused on balancing risk and consequence. The "equal" part refers to the amount you lose being the same as your bet. So if you bet 50 gp and get 0 successes, you lose the 50 gp you bet, and then you're in debt for an additional 50 gp (so 100 gp total, including the debt). It adds a lot of tension and stakes to the game, which feels very fitting for this kind of setting. If we step away from the D&D setting and look at similar luck-based games, things can be a bit simpler. For example, here https://bonustwist.com/casino-bonuses/50-free-spins-no-deposit/ you can find reviews of online casinos that offers 50 no deposit free spins, where you get the bonus without risking anything. These types of bonuses are perfect for newcomers who want to test the casino experience before committing to a deposit. It’s an interesting contrast to the harsh consequences of D&D-style gambling. These types of systems highlight how varying approaches to risk and reward can cater to different player experiences and preferences. It’s fascinating to see how such contrasts influence player engagement and strategy.