First of all, I dont have fizban's yet, but Im a huge nerd about lore that I read older editions just to get a glimpse of something new, and the draconomicon was one of my favourites with all the different infomation about dragons, but a friend told me that fizban's changes a lot about dragons lore, is that true?
I don't know if it contradicts so much as expands and loosens prior "established" lore, placing prior accounts of dragons into the faster and looser "multiverse" of 5e, and actually making Dragons sort of bedrock to that multiverse. FWIW I've also heard from fans of prior Draconomicons, particularly the 3.5/4 e ones that Fizbans is a lot leaner than the meat the past two additions poured in their dragon books. Skimming it, I haven't found any of it world breaking, it's also one of those things where the hype train was so loud I don't think anything in the book surprised me either.
First of all, I dont have fizban's yet, but Im a huge nerd about lore that I read older editions just to get a glimpse of something new, and the draconomicon was one of my favourites with all the different infomation about dragons, but a friend told me that fizban's changes a lot about dragons lore, is that true?
I don't know if it contradicts so much as expands and loosens prior "established" lore, placing prior accounts of dragons into the faster and looser "multiverse" of 5e, and actually making Dragons sort of bedrock to that multiverse. FWIW I've also heard from fans of prior Draconomicons, particularly the 3.5/4 e ones that Fizbans is a lot leaner than the meat the past two additions poured in their dragon books. Skimming it, I haven't found any of it world breaking, it's also one of those things where the hype train was so loud I don't think anything in the book surprised me either.
Jander Sunstar is the thinking person's Drizzt, fight me.