I love DnDBeyond, especially for a couple of the campaigns I'm running. But, I have a server on discord, that I intended to have multiple DMs running ideally the "World" or Campaign. Similar to Roll20 and how they create a "Game" instead of a Campaign, I'd like to have that set up the same way to where I can have multiple DMs for the Game or campaign that I'm running. I hope I'm not the only one that's trying to push this or think about this, although I'm sure there will be plenty that'll tell me to either keep using Roll20, or use a different set website or software but again I really like Beyond. That's just a me thing, hopefully having multiple DMs or creating games and not just campaigns on DnDbeyond.com is something that the developers are considering.
It wouldn't be bad idea to do it - it'd be nice to be able to transfer campaigns as well. Unfortunately, it's not been implemented yet and if it were, it'd either have been done by now, or would be done in time for the launch of 2024e. That means you've probably missed the boat in terms of suggesting it - it's either coming, or it won't at all. This isn't the first time people have asked for it, so it might be coming, but I wouldn't hold my breathe. The choices of what what DDB have focused on have been...confusing.
Sorry I can't be more optimistic, but it is what it is. I'd guess it won't happen, but it might. If it does, I'd expect it soon, or give up hope and make decisions accordingly.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
If you're not willing or able to to discuss in good faith, then don't be surprised if I don't respond, there are better things in life for me to do than humour you. This signature is that response.
I have seen plenty of people talk about the idea. I have seen very few actually try it, and nowhere did it work. And that was usually just two co-DMs as well.
Building the adventure, building the world, and designing NPCs and encounters are not separate. They coexist, and are all part of the same thing. Treating them separately is arguably worse than a single DM just being a little weaker at some aspects of DMing that others. It's a "too many cooks" problem, it causes way more issues than it solves.
A better approach https://xender.vip/, and one that I have seen work is a group where the DM role rotates between the group members within a shared world and campaign. Some DMs are better at certain aspects of DMing, and this style of play showcases that well. After each adventure (usually a few sessions), the DMing role shifts to the next member and the group plays through that DM's adventure- and the cycle repeats. This is much easier too as you only have one DM at a time so have more actual players, rather than (presumably) having 3-4 players and 3 DMs at the same time.
I love DnDBeyond, especially for a couple of the campaigns I'm running. But, I have a server on discord, that I intended to have multiple DMs running ideally the "World" or Campaign. Similar to Roll20 and how they create a "Game" instead of a Campaign, I'd like to have that set up the same way to where I can have multiple DMs for the Game or campaign that I'm running. I hope I'm not the only one that's trying to push this or think about this, although I'm sure there will be plenty that'll tell me to either keep using Roll20, or use a different set website or software but again I really like Beyond. That's just a me thing, hopefully having multiple DMs or creating games and not just campaigns on DnDbeyond.com is something that the developers are considering.
It wouldn't be bad idea to do it - it'd be nice to be able to transfer campaigns as well. Unfortunately, it's not been implemented yet and if it were, it'd either have been done by now, or would be done in time for the launch of 2024e. That means you've probably missed the boat in terms of suggesting it - it's either coming, or it won't at all. This isn't the first time people have asked for it, so it might be coming, but I wouldn't hold my breathe. The choices of what what DDB have focused on have been...confusing.
Sorry I can't be more optimistic, but it is what it is. I'd guess it won't happen, but it might. If it does, I'd expect it soon, or give up hope and make decisions accordingly.
If you're not willing or able to to discuss in good faith, then don't be surprised if I don't respond, there are better things in life for me to do than humour you. This signature is that response.
I have seen plenty of people talk about the idea. I have seen very few actually try it, and nowhere did it work. And that was usually just two co-DMs as well.
Building the adventure, building the world, and designing NPCs and encounters are not separate. They coexist, and are all part of the same thing. Treating them separately is arguably worse than a single DM just being a little weaker at some aspects of DMing that others. It's a "too many cooks" problem, it causes way more issues than it solves.
A better approach https://xender.vip/, and one that I have seen work is a group where the DM role rotates between the group members within a shared world and campaign. Some DMs are better at certain aspects of DMing, and this style of play showcases that well. After each adventure (usually a few sessions), the DMing role shifts to the next member and the group plays through that DM's adventure- and the cycle repeats. This is much easier too as you only have one DM at a time so have more actual players, rather than (presumably) having 3-4 players and 3 DMs at the same time.