So my dnd group is planning a few oneshots of all single class parties.( yes we are aware the balance will be bad but games will be tailored for each party)
And the discussion of the paladin's session came up (with a scenario of hunting down myrkul cultists). And 2 of my players have asked if they could worship 2 of the chaos gods from warhammer fantasy. (Khorne for oath of slaughter, and Nurgle for oath of pestilence) I'm having trouble creating a justifiable reason for them to A) worship these gods(rule of cool says yes). B) lore adjacent(as long as it is vallid enough and can be somewhat defended with facts from any respective/approriate/relevant lore) reason for them to be hunting down myrkul cultists.
Any thoughts would be appreciated. The group as a whole is open to the use of those gods just trying to iron out some details to make it make some sense.
Assuming you are playing in the FR, just find a similar god and use them. Theres certainly precedent for FR gods existing in other pantheons and other worlds. Maybe they use a different name in the different worlds, and this character, for some reason, knows the hod by that name. Really, the god will have little game mechanics impact on the character, so I’d let them flavor it however they like.
And I’d put the why on the player. Make them explain why they call the god something different, and why they’re motivated to do this.
I’d also add, by RAW, there is no requirement that paladins have any affiliation with a god. If that’s the way you play in your world, that would certainly take precedence, but the rules don’t care if there’s a god involved at all.
While I do appreciate the advice(and I will research some equivalent gods to substitute for) it technically didn't answer my questions.
Let me rephrase, other than the standard rule of killing myrkul cultists on sight. What would be a convincing reason for a follower of khorne or nurgle to hunt a myrkul cult down.
And for the record my group has rule zeroed that all paladins and clerics must follow a God or pantheon for rp purposes(we really get into character and enjoy a good theological debate). The only exception is oathbreakers.
While I do appreciate the advice(and I will research some equivalent gods to substitute for) it technically didn't answer my questions.
Let me rephrase, other than the standard rule of killing myrkul cultists on sight. What would be a convincing reason for a follower of khorne or nurgle to hunt a myrkul cult down.
That’s what I meant by let the player figure it out. If they want to import a new god into the setting, cool. But that doesn’t mean it has to be on you to make it work. Make/allow them to do the world building of how that fits into the existing world.
And I’d also say it’s less important why a follower of a certain god might do something, and more about why their character might. Sure, maybe they’re following orders from the church. Easy-peasy. But maybe they aren’t. Maybe their church is neutral on the issue, and the higher-ups have their own thoughts about this character’s personal crusade. Or maybe they are in conflict with their church’s stance. Let those things be part of the backstory — with your approval, of course.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
So my dnd group is planning a few oneshots of all single class parties.( yes we are aware the balance will be bad but games will be tailored for each party)
And the discussion of the paladin's session came up (with a scenario of hunting down myrkul cultists). And 2 of my players have asked if they could worship 2 of the chaos gods from warhammer fantasy. (Khorne for oath of slaughter, and Nurgle for oath of pestilence) I'm having trouble creating a justifiable reason for them to A) worship these gods(rule of cool says yes). B) lore adjacent(as long as it is vallid enough and can be somewhat defended with facts from any respective/approriate/relevant lore) reason for them to be hunting down myrkul cultists.
Any thoughts would be appreciated. The group as a whole is open to the use of those gods just trying to iron out some details to make it make some sense.
As the DM, tell them that and the answer is "NO they can't"
Assuming you are playing in the FR, just find a similar god and use them. Theres certainly precedent for FR gods existing in other pantheons and other worlds. Maybe they use a different name in the different worlds, and this character, for some reason, knows the hod by that name. Really, the god will have little game mechanics impact on the character, so I’d let them flavor it however they like.
And I’d put the why on the player. Make them explain why they call the god something different, and why they’re motivated to do this.
I’d also add, by RAW, there is no requirement that paladins have any affiliation with a god. If that’s the way you play in your world, that would certainly take precedence, but the rules don’t care if there’s a god involved at all.
While I do appreciate the advice(and I will research some equivalent gods to substitute for) it technically didn't answer my questions.
Let me rephrase, other than the standard rule of killing myrkul cultists on sight. What would be a convincing reason for a follower of khorne or nurgle to hunt a myrkul cult down.
And for the record my group has rule zeroed that all paladins and clerics must follow a God or pantheon for rp purposes(we really get into character and enjoy a good theological debate). The only exception is oathbreakers.
That’s what I meant by let the player figure it out. If they want to import a new god into the setting, cool. But that doesn’t mean it has to be on you to make it work. Make/allow them to do the world building of how that fits into the existing world.
And I’d also say it’s less important why a follower of a certain god might do something, and more about why their character might. Sure, maybe they’re following orders from the church. Easy-peasy. But maybe they aren’t. Maybe their church is neutral on the issue, and the higher-ups have their own thoughts about this character’s personal crusade. Or maybe they are in conflict with their church’s stance. Let those things be part of the backstory — with your approval, of course.