so no one knows about the invisibility question and you're all stuck on if a spider is something an Orc would kill...gotcha.
Could you perhaps repeat the question? (I think I got lost and the spider ate it.)
lol the spider debate did seem pretty intense.
Sorry, I was just wondering if a Warlock cast Invisibility, has an Imp go up to target (Imp is also invisible) and then next turn the Warlock casts a touch spell for the Imp to deliver via its reaction, would this cause A. Both the Warlock and Imp to become visible, B. Just the Warlock to become visible and Imp remains invisible or C. Warlock remains invisible but Imp is now visible.
If it matters the spell I was thinking was Inflict Wounds, so it is a spell casting attack roll touch spell.
Sorry, I was just wondering if a Warlock cast Invisibility, has an Imp go up to target (Imp is also invisible) and then next turn the Warlock casts a touch spell for the Imp to deliver via its reaction, would this cause A. Both the Warlock and Imp to become visible, B. Just the Warlock to become visible and Imp remains invisible or C. Warlock remains invisible but Imp is now visible.
If it matters the spell I was thinking was Inflict Wounds, so it is a spell casting attack roll touch spell.
The imp remains invisible until it makes an attack or loses concentration, so it would still be invisible as it is not attacking, it is using its action to "deliver the spell".
The Warlock if using the spell invisibility would lose invisibility as he just cast a spell.
Sorry, I was just wondering if a Warlock cast Invisibility, has an Imp go up to target (Imp is also invisible) and then next turn the Warlock casts a touch spell for the Imp to deliver via its reaction, would this cause A. Both the Warlock and Imp to become visible, B. Just the Warlock to become visible and Imp remains invisible or C. Warlock remains invisible but Imp is now visible.
If it matters the spell I was thinking was Inflict Wounds, so it is a spell casting attack roll touch spell.
The imp remains invisible until it makes an attack or loses concentration, so it would still be invisible as it is not attacking, it is using its action to "deliver the spell".
The Warlock if using the spell invisibility would lose invisibility as he just cast a spell.
Sorry, I was just wondering if a Warlock cast Invisibility, has an Imp go up to target (Imp is also invisible) and then next turn the Warlock casts a touch spell for the Imp to deliver via its reaction, would this cause A. Both the Warlock and Imp to become visible, B. Just the Warlock to become visible and Imp remains invisible or C. Warlock remains invisible but Imp is now visible.
If it matters the spell I was thinking was Inflict Wounds, so it is a spell casting attack roll touch spell.
The imp remains invisible until it makes an attack or loses concentration, so it would still be invisible as it is not attacking, it is using its action to "deliver the spell".
The Warlock if using the spell invisibility would lose invisibility as he just cast a spell.
That is how I would interpret it.
Ahh gotcha that makes sense!
Id say both the warlock and imp become visible. You cast a spell, si there's absolutely no debate you become visible. But the imp? Sure, he may have just delivered the spell, but he's pretty much attacking at that point.
My barbarian has a few levels in Warlock, and has a sprite familiar. It pairs really well with Gift of the Ever-Living Ones as an invocation since he heals for insane amounts.
Your familiar is beefed up, which means it can be better in combat. If you take investment of the chain master, your familiar can help control the battle field so you don’t have to get into the middle of battle, or technically give you 2 attacks, since you can use your attack then the familiars attack. You can scout really well, and with the pact of the chain familiars, they can actually communicate with you/party members pretty well. You also get help action from the familiar all of the time, and they can do some really cool stuff, like scare people, turn invisible, and polymorph!
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
lol the spider debate did seem pretty intense.
Sorry, I was just wondering if a Warlock cast Invisibility, has an Imp go up to target (Imp is also invisible) and then next turn the Warlock casts a touch spell for the Imp to deliver via its reaction, would this cause A. Both the Warlock and Imp to become visible, B. Just the Warlock to become visible and Imp remains invisible or C. Warlock remains invisible but Imp is now visible.
If it matters the spell I was thinking was Inflict Wounds, so it is a spell casting attack roll touch spell.
The OP literally asked this question; thus the title "Sell Me on the Pact of the Chain".
The imp remains invisible until it makes an attack or loses concentration, so it would still be invisible as it is not attacking, it is using its action to "deliver the spell".
The Warlock if using the spell invisibility would lose invisibility as he just cast a spell.
That is how I would interpret it.
Ahh gotcha that makes sense!
Id say both the warlock and imp become visible. You cast a spell, si there's absolutely no debate you become visible. But the imp? Sure, he may have just delivered the spell, but he's pretty much attacking at that point.
My barbarian has a few levels in Warlock, and has a sprite familiar. It pairs really well with Gift of the Ever-Living Ones as an invocation since he heals for insane amounts.
Your familiar is beefed up, which means it can be better in combat. If you take investment of the chain master, your familiar can help control the battle field so you don’t have to get into the middle of battle, or technically give you 2 attacks, since you can use your attack then the familiars attack. You can scout really well, and with the pact of the chain familiars, they can actually communicate with you/party members pretty well. You also get help action from the familiar all of the time, and they can do some really cool stuff, like scare people, turn invisible, and polymorph!