I've requested a chang log/planned features post by the devs so that we can get a better idea of features that will be added. If you all could kindly bump it i think it would helpful for this and everyone else's requests.
While my first choice would be a metric conversion, if it's going to stick to imperial how about an option to have stones (ie 14lbs). I have no idea in my head what something like 250lbs is, and having to divide by 14 all the time makes my head hurt.
I would definitely love a metric D&D. It's not that hard using the imperial system, but I personally loose immersion every time I have to step out of the world to calculate something and be sure it makes sense. In most cases I just neglect some attributes (most often weight), as long as I have an idea about the volume.
In my regular group, we do quick and dirty 1 square = 1.5m for getting an idea of how big/small/far things are. I'd gladly sacrifice a couple of centimeters (or inches) in range if it means I can use the measurements I'm familiar with in easy to handle numbers.
I've requested a chang log/planned features post by the devs so that we can get a better idea of features that will be added. If you all could kindly bump it i think it would helpful for this and everyone else's requests.
Post here: https://www.dndbeyond.com/forums/d-d-beyond-general/beta-testing-feedback/1370-github-like-change-log
Good call.
While my first choice would be a metric conversion, if it's going to stick to imperial how about an option to have stones (ie 14lbs). I have no idea in my head what something like 250lbs is, and having to divide by 14 all the time makes my head hurt.
I would definitely love a metric D&D. It's not that hard using the imperial system, but I personally loose immersion every time I have to step out of the world to calculate something and be sure it makes sense. In most cases I just neglect some attributes (most often weight), as long as I have an idea about the volume.
~Keep up the good work~
In my regular group, we do quick and dirty 1 square = 1.5m for getting an idea of how big/small/far things are. I'd gladly sacrifice a couple of centimeters (or inches) in range if it means I can use the measurements I'm familiar with in easy to handle numbers.
Yeah, this could be a good idea, even though I always played the distances in terms of tiles.
Since they announced the upcoming traslation in Italian, maybe they should think better about this "little" detail.
English is not my native language, I'm sorry for my not proper writing. Feedback is welcome, feel free to correct my mistakes!