Divine Soul will give a character access to Spirit Guardians and Glyph of warding.
Warlock (3) will give you access to Chain pact and Investment of the chain master.
What prevents the player from casting Spirit Guardian into the glyph indicating all the current party members and then giving the glyph to the imp to set off in battle.
In theory its an invisible 10 min (Glyph removes the concentration part) floating powerhouse.
Would this work? I now a DM would probably make sure the IMP is always the top target, but I'm just playing with options right now.
I feel like something about Spirit Guardians wouldn't work because the spell targets Self. Even if triggered by a third party the spell still only technically works on yourself. This might be an interesting way to cast Spirit Guardians in such a way that it doesn't take up your own concentration if, for example, you were to trigger the glyph yourself.
Divine Soul will give a character access to Spirit Guardians and Glyph of warding.
Warlock (3) will give you access to Chain pact and Investment of the chain master.
What prevents the player from casting Spirit Guardian into the glyph indicating all the current party members and then giving the glyph to the imp to set off in battle.
In theory its an invisible 10 min (Glyph removes the concentration part) floating powerhouse.
Would this work? I now a DM would probably make sure the IMP is always the top target, but I'm just playing with options right now.
No. As a Sorlock, you can't embed spells in a glyph of warding, as only prepared spells can be embedded in it, and you won't have any prepared spells.
Divine Soul will give a character access to Spirit Guardians and Glyph of warding.
Warlock (3) will give you access to Chain pact and Investment of the chain master.
What prevents the player from casting Spirit Guardian into the glyph indicating all the current party members and then giving the glyph to the imp to set off in battle.
In theory its an invisible 10 min (Glyph removes the concentration part) floating powerhouse.
Would this work? I now a DM would probably make sure the IMP is always the top target, but I'm just playing with options right now.
No. As a Sorlock, you can't embed spells in a glyph of warding, as only prepared spells can be embedded in it, and you won't have any prepared spells.
Wait, are you saying that if a mono-class Bard learns this spell, they can only use the explosive runes option because they learn spells rather than preparing them? That seems RAW, but I think only the most exacting DM would limit a player to that extent. As an alternative, could it be that any learned spell counts as an always prepared spell?
No. As a Sorlock, you can't embed spells in a glyph of warding, as only prepared spells can be embedded in it, and you won't have any prepared spells.
Wait, are you saying that if a mono-class Bard learns this spell, they can only use the explosive runes option because they learn spells rather than preparing them? That seems RAW, but I think only the most exacting DM would limit a player to that extent. As an alternative, could it be that any learned spell counts as an always prepared spell?
If you go 100% rules as written, its correct.
Rules as intended, I doubt that is the intent. Mainly because its given to the Cleric and Bard classes by default.
Before a spellcaster can use a spell, he or she must have the spell firmly fixed in mind, or must have access to the spell in a magic item. Members of a few classes, including bards and sorcerers, have a limited list of spells they know that are always fixed in mind. The same thing is true of many magic-using monsters. Other spellcasters, such as clerics and wizards, undergo a process of preparing spells. This process varies for different classes, as detailed in their descriptions.
In every case, the number of spells a caster can have fixed in mind at any given time depends on the character's level.
I feel like "firmly fixed in mind" was what they were getting at, but is not the language they used, probably because "firmly fixed in mind" is unwieldy.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Canto alla vita alla sua bellezza ad ogni sua ferita ogni sua carezza!
I sing to life and to its tragic beauty To pain and to strife, but all that dances through me The rise and the fall, I've lived through it all!
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Divine Soul will give a character access to Spirit Guardians and Glyph of warding.
Warlock (3) will give you access to Chain pact and Investment of the chain master.
What prevents the player from casting Spirit Guardian into the glyph indicating all the current party members and then giving the glyph to the imp to set off in battle.
In theory its an invisible 10 min (Glyph removes the concentration part) floating powerhouse.
Would this work? I now a DM would probably make sure the IMP is always the top target, but I'm just playing with options right now.
I feel like something about Spirit Guardians wouldn't work because the spell targets Self. Even if triggered by a third party the spell still only technically works on yourself. This might be an interesting way to cast Spirit Guardians in such a way that it doesn't take up your own concentration if, for example, you were to trigger the glyph yourself.
Watch Crits for Breakfast, an adults-only RP-Heavy Roll20 Livestream at twitch.tv/afterdisbooty
And now you too can play with the amazing art and assets we use in Roll20 for our campaign at Hazel's Emporium
No. As a Sorlock, you can't embed spells in a glyph of warding, as only prepared spells can be embedded in it, and you won't have any prepared spells.
Wait, are you saying that if a mono-class Bard learns this spell, they can only use the explosive runes option because they learn spells rather than preparing them? That seems RAW, but I think only the most exacting DM would limit a player to that extent. As an alternative, could it be that any learned spell counts as an always prepared spell?
If you go 100% rules as written, its correct.
Rules as intended, I doubt that is the intent. Mainly because its given to the Cleric and Bard classes by default.
I feel like "firmly fixed in mind" was what they were getting at, but is not the language they used, probably because "firmly fixed in mind" is unwieldy.
Canto alla vita
alla sua bellezza
ad ogni sua ferita
ogni sua carezza!
I sing to life and to its tragic beauty
To pain and to strife, but all that dances through me
The rise and the fall, I've lived through it all!